How can you use ASET?
  1. Solve problems that defy solution.
  2. Make seemingly impossible
    dreams come true.
  3. Create choices when you
    do not know what to do.
The breakthrough program that will enable you to do your best every time you do anything. When you were a child, your were taught to walk and talk, sing and dance, but no one taught you to think. Learn how to use the concepts of ASET and ACTINEMAS to think like Einstein without being a genius, and perform like a surgeon without even being a doctor.
Do your best every time
you do
anything and
pursue excellence 24/7.

Sec. Clinton Blew The Whistle On President Obama, Herself, Mr Trump And All Presidential Candidates And Congress At The Benghazi Hearings With A Single Statement

July 15, 2016

WITH ONE STATEMENT MADE DURING THE CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS ON BENGHAZI, SEC. CLINTON INITIATED A CHAIN REACTION THAT PROVIDED EVIDENCE THAT ...

(1) INCULPATED PRESIDENT OBAMA IN THE BENGHAZI DEBACLE;(Q.2; A.2;);

(2) PROVED PRESIDENT OBAMA ABROGATED HIS OATH;(Q.3; A.3;);

(3) PROVED THAT NONE OF THE "CANDIDATES" INCLUDING HERSELF AND MR. TRUMP CAN EVER WIN THE WAR ON TERRORISM, DELIVER ON THEIR PROMISES OR SOLVE ANY OF THE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" CONFRONTING THE NATION LOGISTICALLY, BASED ON THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY, THAT MADE OUR DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE WHAT IT IS;(Q.5; A.5;);

(4) INCULPATED PRESIDENT OBAMA, SEN. MARCO RUBIO, CONG. ALAN GREYSON, SPEAKER BOEHNER, SEN. BARBARA BOXER AND CONG. MICHAEL CONWAY IN THE ORLANDO MASSACRE;((Q11; A.11;));

(6) PROVED THAT DR. CARSON FAILED BECAUSE HE IS A COPYCAT (Q.9; A.9;;

(7) PROVIDED EVIDENCE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA'S BRAIN 2025 INITIATIVE IS PRODUCT OF CYBER PLAGIARISM, A "CATCH 22" PROPOSITION AND A SCIENTIFIC HOAX (;(Q.12; A.12;;

(8) PROVED THAT CONGRESS HAS BECOME NON-FUNCTIONAL AND WE NEED TO MAKE A PARADIGM SHIFT IN THE WAY WE THINK AS WE SOLVE PROBLEMS FROM USING COMMON SENSE TO DO EVERYTHING TO USING THE RULES OF RELATIVITY (Q.6; A.6;)

(9) THAT OUR CONSTITUTION HAS BECOME OBSOLETE AND WE NEED TO ORCHESTRATE A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT THAT WILL INCORPORATE THE RULES OF RELATIVITY INTO THE DEMOCRATIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESS BY MAKING BIPARTISANSHIP MANDATORY IN ALL DEMOCRATIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESSESS(Q.6; A.6;)

(10) SHE PROVIDED THIS EVALUATION OF THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY, THE TRUE STATE OF THE UNION), CONGRESS AND THE CONSTITUTION, BASED ON EINSTEIN'S THEORY OF RELATIVITY THAT MADE OUR "DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE" WHAT IT IS, AND PROVIDED A PREDICTION OF WHAT MUST BE DONE TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEMS RECOGNIZED BASED ON THE THEORY AND THE RULES OF RELATIVITY;((Q.13; A13:) AT A TIME, WHEN NO PREDICTION BASED ON THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY HAS PROVED WRONG YET!

AND THE COMMITTEE INVESTIGATING HER MISSED IT ALL

BY

AJITKUMAR TRIVIKRAM, MD. FACS


INTRODUCTION

Ex-Secretary of State Mrs. Hillary Clinton made one statement during the Benghazi Hearings (Q.1; A.1;) that did all of ten things enumerated in the subtitles of this expose. Yet the Congressional Committee investigating her missed all ten facts. It found that "she had done no wrong" and had provided "No new evidence."

The FBI has investigated everyone who has committed a random act of violence or terror, just before s/he had committed the act, only to release them to commit the very crime, to prevent which, they were investigated, without realizing that they were intellectual time bombs waiting to explode. In spite of all the incidents that have occurred, and all the investigations, the authorities are still unable to determine what makes people who were born normal babies grow up to commit such acts, or what can be done to prevent them. This is in spite of all the fact that all of them described the precise reason why they committed the crime and in spite of the story being repeated every time, no one pays any attention to their stories while incidences of such acts go on increasing in frequency and severity.

This is an indication of the fact that we, as individuals and as a nation, our Congress, and our FBI, and all our investigational authorities have become intellectually non-functional! We have tremendous technological capabilities, but we cannot recognize or process facts placed before us or deal with information handed to us on silver platters.

The same thing happened in physics a hundred years ago, when theoretical physicists started making mistakes in physics that rendered them non-functional, but after three such incidents, Albert Einstein asked and answered a set of three questions repeatedly that enabled him to discover the cause of "these problems that seem insoluble," relativity, and solve all of them, and make new discoveries that propelled civilization from the slow "horse and buggy" days of Newtonian physics to the dynamic "digital-atomic age" based on relativity, of today � and he did it without a computer, monitor or any other mechanical device to help him think. He did it by using his brain as a living monitor, computer, and an intellectual GPS device to discover relativity that years later led to the discovery of the GPS device that enables us to get around today, but none of these devices can still help us think as we try to solve "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense!

When Einstein discovered relativity, (the fact that the speed of light does not obey the laws of common sense (Newton's laws of motion), but that it abides by the rules of relativity that are the opposite of everything dictated by common sense, relativity had no application in everyday life. This was because light was the only thing that moved at the speed of light in everyday life at that time, and because light though it enables perception, is itself imperceptible.

However, this changed drastically in the next seventy or so years as advances made using relativity transformed our world and "relativity" began exerting increasingly greater amounts of influence on everything in life. Now, relativity affects everything in life because it led to the advent of Information technology (IT) that made information travel at the speed of light in everyday life, Computer science (CS) that enabled processing information at the speed of light, and Weapons of Mass destruction (WOMD) that enabled mass destruction to occur explosively, also at the speed of light, and nothing that moves or occurs at the speed of light, obeys the laws of common sense.

EVEN INFORMATION BASED ON COMMON SENSE DOES NOT OBEY THE RULES OF COMMON SENSE WHEN IT TRAVELS AT THE SPEED OF LIGHT, WHEN EVEN COMPUTERS WORKING AT THE SAME SPEED CANNOT PTOCESS IT, MAKING IT A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN ITS OWN RIGHT, IF ONE DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO PROCESS IT USING THE ONLY COMPUTER THAT CAN WORK FASTER THAN LIGHT, THE HUMAN BRAIN WORKING LIKE A COMPUTER USING AN ALGORITHM BASED ON THE RULES OF RELATIVITY (ACTINEMAS).

Everything that happens in our "digital-atomic age" abides by the rules of relativity that are the opposite of common sense, but everyone went on merrily trying to solve problems that common sense cannot solve in a lifetime, using the common sense that caused them in the first place and kept on getting into trouble every time one did anything. The only reason why we are still surviving is that the simultaneous advent of the electronic computer that ameliorated these disasters and made them tolerable!

It took Einstein three mistakes by physicists to make him discover relativity and make a paradigm shift in the way physicists thought, from using common sense to do everything, to using relativity, and he eliminated the problem of "problems that seem insoluble using common sense" from physics!

Unfortunately, the encroachment of relativity into every aspect of everyday life and democratic governance as a result of the electronic transmission of information, processing of information using computers and the constant threat of mass destruction occurring without notice that forces everyone to make "human" mistakes in almost everything we do, went unnoticed because the "University Professors" of theoretical physics, the descendants of those who took a quarter of a century to accept relativity when Einstein discovered it, whose duty it was to detect, prevent and remedy this, did nothing for reasons given in (Q.12; A.12;) and they have failed to recognized the fact that we are making these horrendous mistakes that are easily prevented and corrected by simply making the paradigm shift Einstein made in physics, in our everyday lives! What is worse is that they refuse to listen to, accept or refute this statement when presented to them!

The real tragedy of this situation is the fact that President Obama was informed about this development seven and a half years ago when he was still a Candidate, and on numerous occasions thereafter in the "Letters to the President" listed in Addendum I when he was requested to get these "Professors" to respond by executive action but chose to do the things listed in (Q.12; A.12;). He did these things in spite of being informed and warned that all the problems he would ever have to solve as President, were always going to be "problems that seem insoluble using common sense" and he will only be able to solve them using Einstein's Philosophy for solving them but he has refused to even respond to these letters.

In this expose, I shall ask and answer the three simple questions Einstein asked and answered repeatedly with regard to Sec. Clinton's epoch-making pan-whistle-blowing statement and "discover" the cascade of critical facts disclosed here that should have been discovered, addressed and resolved by the Congressional Committee that investigated her and it would have done so, had President Obama done what he was requested to do eight years ago instead forcing the enaction of Obamacare by a non-functioning, dysfunctional system without fixing it first, as the oath he had just taken required him to do. I shall apologize to my Commander-in-chief the day he reverses what he has done. Until then, these are the kindest words I have to say.

As a matter of fact, the Benghazi debacle, and all the debacles of the Obama Presidency would in all probabilities, not have happened, had President Obama shared this information with everyone when it was given to him because Sec. Clinton would then have been aware of it and would have used it preemptively and prevented or aborted this debacle in the first place.

In fact, had President Obama acted upon the recommendations given to him in a timely manner, we should have won the war on terrorism and on war itself by now. we would have eliminated the need for anyone to engage in terrorism or war as a problem-solving method to solve "problems that seem insoluble, a method that became obsolete the day Einstein discovered relativity but remains in use today thanks to the negligence of the current batch of "University Professors" of theoretical physics and the ones heading President Obama's "Dream Team" and President Obama himself (Q.12; A.12).

The answers to the questions asked here will be succinct but the details required to justify them are long and could be cumbersome, but once they are understood, solving "problems that seem insoluble" will become something that is fun to do and can be done instantaneously, literally at the speed of light, the speed at which relativity works but, they will not be solved in an eternity if we continue to use common sense!

All the details regarding what has just been said are contained in the original "Letters to The President" in which this information was conveyed to President Obama. They are archived at my website at http://www.successateverything.com and at my blog site at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/ and are summarized in Addendum I. References will be made to them as required to save space.

The most significant of these postings and blogs are as follows;

i. The First "Letter to the President" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/letter.php

ii. "Einstein's I-Bomb" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/einstein.php

iii. "What is "ACTINEMAS" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/27

iv. "What is ASET" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/28

v. "Benghazi occurred because the White House still cannot join the dots" archived at
http://www.successateverything.com/blog/94.

vi. "Mr. Trump, Prove Me Wrong, or Please Trade in in Your Trademark (of "you're fired") for Mine (ACTINEMAS), or You're Fired" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/130.

vii. "Obamagate, the Evidence," the "Letter of Complaint, Bill of Particulars" and a "cease and desist request/order to President Obama" concerning plagiarism, trademark violation, modification of a scientific concept and failure to act upon recommendations based on it resulting in predicted undesirable, disastrous outcomes archived at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100 that was submitted for action to Sen. Marco Rubio, Cong. Alan Grayson, Ex-Speaker John Boehner, Sen. Barbara Boxer, and Cong. Michael Conway, and have been ignored by them for the last nine months.

Had the people just enumerated acted upon this petition, it is possible that the FBI would have averted the massacre at Orlando, and possibly averted all the massacres that have occurred for the last six months here and elsewhere.

And that brings us to the first question that we must ask and answer to make this expose ...

Q.1: WHAT WAS SEC. CLINTON'S WHISTLE BLOWING STATEMENT?

A. 1: This statement was made by Mrs. Clinton in response to a question by Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio during the Benghazi hearings when she said: " ... We DID THE BEST WE COULD with THE INFORMATION WE HAD ... at that time..."

And that immediately raises the next question ...

Q.2: WHY DOES THIS SEEMINGLY INNOCUOUS STATEMENT (I DID MY BEST WITH THE INFORMATION HAD)INCULPATE PRESIDENT OBAMA IN THE BENGHAZI DEBACLE AND DO ALL THE OTHER THINGS LISTED?

A. 2: This statement blows the whistle on President Obama and inculpates him in the debacle and topples all "the dominos" listed for the following three reasons:

i. Because Sec. Clinton would not have made this claim and the debacle at Benghazi might not have happened, had President Obama not concealed from her, Congress and all Americans, "Information" that he was given at the outset of his Presidency with the request that he make "every man, woman and child living in this country" aware of it.

This request was made of President Obama, because this "information" had become vital for the survival of every man, woman and child living in this country and on this planet as a result of changes caused by Einstein's discovery of relativity that made our "digital-atomic age" what it is. These changes have not been appreciated by anyone because they developed insidiously over a period of a hundred years and were compensated for by the simultaneous advancements in technology (computer science) that addressed thee problems making it unnecessary for us to deal with most (but not all) of them by ourselves.

ii.Because the "Information" President Obama concealed from everyone consisted of an algorithm named ACTINMAS, the algorithm for the "pursuit of perfection." This algorithm works by insuring that one has done "everything one could possibly have done" every time one does anything by acting as a check list of "all the things one could possibly do using one's body and mind."

This algorithm has become, by usage, the unwritten definition of the standards of "due diligence" set by legal precedents and conventions of society. People who are required to take oaths by their professions like the Hippocratic Oath, or oaths of office like the Presidential Oath, to "do their best every time they do anything," and all professional people especially surgeons, are required to abide by their dictates under penalty of the law and at the risk of ostrasization by society if they fail to take as much as a single step and their "negligence" results in an undesirable outcome (injury).

SEC. CLINTON DID NOT TAKE A SINGLE ONE OF THE STEPS OF THESE ALGORITHMS THAT SHE WAS OBLIGATED TO TAKE, TO JUSTIFY HER CLAIM BY LEGAL AND MORAL STANDARDS AND THEREFORE DID NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO MAKE THIS STATEMENT BECAUSE SHE HAD ESSENTIALLY DONE NOTHING.

iii. Because Mrs. Clinton's statement that she had done her best ... "WITH THE INFORMATION WE HAD ..." implies that "THE INFORMATION SHE HAD" at the time of decision-making was, for some reason, lacking information she needed but did not have, information that would have enabled her to do better.

iv. This statement inculpates President Obama a second time because the information he withheld from her and all Americans, was and is the description of the algorithms that would have enabled her to obtain this information for herself as a professional politician and leader, the way all other professional people obtain such information routinely, failure to do which is considered "negligence" by definition by criteria set by legal precedents and by the conventions and constraints of society.

Had President Obama made information about these algorithms known to everyone as he was requested to do at the outset of his Presidency, Sec. Clinton would have known about them, used them, and they would have enabled her to obtain all the information she needed but did not have, that could in turn have enabled her to take preemptive action to prevent, abort, or ameliorate, the debacle that followed. This makes President Obama directly culpable in the Benghazi debacle.

And that raises the next question ...

Q.3: HOW DOES SECTRETARY CLINTON'S STATEMENT BLOW THE WHISTLE ON PRESIDENT OBAMA AND PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT HE ABROGATED HIS OATH OF OFFICE?

A. 3: Mrs. Clinton's statement blows the whistle on President Obama and proves that he abrogated his oath of office for the following TEN reasons ...

i. Because the algorithms president Obama concealed from Sec. Clinton, ACTINEMAS and ASET, that would have enabled her, "do her best," at Benghazi, were also the algorithms that would have enabled him to insure that he had "done his best" to "preserve, protect and serve the Constitution of the United States" ... as required by his oath of office as the keeper of the Constitution.

"The Letters to The President" had advised him that using these algorithms for "the pursuit of perfection" every time he did anything would insure that he had done everything "to the best of his ability" as required by every definition of "the pursuit of perfection" including the legal one established at the tort litigations.

His response to this recommendation given during his 2013 SOTU Address, ("Obamagate, the Evidence" 5.3;) was "We were not sent here (to Washington) to be perfect." This statement, reveals that he did not even feel obliged to abide by the requirements of his oath.

In addition, President Obama was informed in "The Letters" that the Constitution was already nonfunctional when he assumed office. He was informed that the advent of Information technology, computer science and weapons of mass destruction had enabled information to be transmitted and processed at the speed of light and made it possible for mass destruction to occur explosively at speeds approaching the speed of light. These three developments had made common sense, the philosophy our forefathers had used to draft the Constitution, non-functional in our digital-atomic age because common sense does not work when anything in an equation is travelling or occurring at or near the velocity of light as proved beyond doubt by Einstein.

These developments had precipitated the need for the President, as the keeper of the Constitution, to amend it and make it functional again in our digital-atomic age in which the rules of relativity rule supreme, in addition to the laws of common sense, not common sense alone.

ii. If President Obama had not made any comment about these recommendations, I would only have been able to accuse him of having ignored "The Letters" and their recommendations. I would not have had the proof that he was aware of their contents even though these "Letters" had been sent by track-able forms of mail and tracked to people responsible for dealing with his mail. He could still have argued, though lamely, that he did not read them and/or was not aware of their contents, or did not understand them.

iii. The fact that he tried to justify not acting upon a fundamental recommendation of "The Letters" that he was required to engage in "the pursuit of perfection" to satisfy his oath of office, when no one else, has said anything to this effect, reveals that he was aware of the contents of "The Letters." It was also obvious that he had not acted upon its recommendations deliberately as alleged, and that he was prompted by guilty conscience to justify his inactions and actions during a speech as important as a State of the Union Address! This denial justifies my statement that this expose reveals the true state of our Union based on Einstein's theory of relativity because the consequences of this epoch making advent, have not yet been accounted for in the Constitution and the current President does not agree that it is his responsibility as the "keeper of the Constitution" to amend it and keep it functional when evolving developments make it non-functional for any reason!!!

iv. Any allegation that merits a response by a President at a SOTU Address, also merits a formal enquiry in which the accuser and he can confront one another and "we the people" can determine for ourselves, the validity of this unilateral response by the President.

v. President Obama's opinion; "We were not sent here to be perfect," was unconstitutional on its own rights. If the authors of the Constitution did not think it was necessary for the President "to pursue perfection," while protecting the integrity of the Constitution, they would not have made it the fundamental promise incorporated into his Oath of Office that the President protect the integrity of the Constitution "to the best of my (his) ability" at all times.

vi. At the time the Constitution was framed, the term "pursuit of perfection" or "being perfect" did not exist. Now it does. In addition, it has been defined in no uncertain terms by legal precedents and by convention. The fact that the Constitution requires him to take this oath as the first thing he had to do before he assumed office, establishes the fact that according to the Constitution, he was sent to Washington to be perfect in his role as its keeper. No one, not even the President, is above the Constitution.

vii. An allegation of plagiarism cannot be ignored by one whose job requires intellectual integrity and honesty, like a "University Professor," surgeon, or an elected official who is required to take an oath on assuming office. Failure to respond to an allegation of plagiarism with a convincing rebuttal is tantamount to admission of guilt especially because, the accuser stands to lose just as much as the accused. If the allegation is proved false. The punishment for both offenses is the same, ostrasization.

viii. His failure to respond to this allegation for over two years when courts allow surgeons three weeks (personal experience) to respond to civil allegations, makes him and the leaders of his Dream Team, guilty by default to the allegations that include plagiarism and modification of scientific concepts for their personal gain and possible fiduciary benefits at the expense of the people and the country as alleged in "Obamagate, The Evidence."

ix. President Obama, as the keeper of the Constitution, should have been on the lookout for anything that violates the integrity of the Constitution at all times and should have realized by himself that the Constitution had become non-functional upon assuming office for the following additional reasons;

a. The government had not been functional during the Bush Administration as evidenced by President Bush's own laments that he was unable to get anything done, the reason why the first of "The Letters" was written and addressed to him;

b. He should have realized that the non-functional government was the reason why his battle cry of 'I am going to make a change in America' enabled him to get elected by a landslide and the reason why "we the people" sent him to Washington in the first place.

c. He should have realized this after his attention was drawn to this fact by the first of "The Letters."

d. He should have realized that our Government, our Congress and our Constitution had become non-functional after he difficulties he had encountered in his endeavors to get anything done beginning with Obamacare, on three occasions during his first term or after each threesome of failures that followed, culminating in a Government shut-down at the end of his first term after which it never really functioned again (as predicted in "Einstein's I-bomb video clip).

e. He should have realized it after he had been warned about it on seven, more occasions in the remaining "Letters."

f. If no one had drawn his attention to the first five of "The Letters" he should have had his attention drawn to it at least after the sixth "Letter" that was signed by a person (yours truly) who called himself "The I-Bomber" (to see if at least this would attract the President's attention or at least the FBI's, The Cia's, Homeland Security's or even just the Mail-handler at the White house's attention, but, no such luck).

g. He should have realized it after the all the predictions made in the YouTube video Clip titled "Einstein's I-Bomb" (Letter No. 5) had materialized including the final one that warned him about the government shut down towards the end of his first term that came true as predicted ... but he still did not react or respond.

h. He and the leaders of his "dream Team should have realized it or acted upon it when they received "Obamagate, The Evidence," and a time limit to respond was set, but he and they, have failed to respond or refute these allegations.


x. In conclusion, at the time the Presidential Oath was written into the Constitution, the concept of using algorithms (check lists) for doing things to the best of ones ability did not exist. Now they do. Not only do they exist, but those who take oaths of office or professional oaths, are required by laws established by precedents set at trial litigations of professional negligence, to take the steps that define "due diligence" that people who have taken such oaths are required to honor under penalty of the law. President Obama has not honored this requirement. President Obama had been warned in all eight of "The Letters" that all the problems that the American President would be required to solve were always going to be "problems that seem insoluble," as all other "solvable" problems would have been solved by others, and "The Letters" had suggested and recommended that President Obama should use ACTINEMASor ASET, its shortcut, to do everything he did as they had been proved to work by a hundred years of experience by professional people from all walks of life. This would have enabled him to kill not just two, but all the birds he had to kill, with one stone. These facts prove that there is only way the keeper of the Constitution, The President, could have prevented such eventualities and that is by being "on a war footing" 24/7, and insuring the constitution remains viable at all times, and the only way s/he can do this is by making the Amendment that will make the use of algorithms that would insure this, mandatory. This is a requirement that materialized after the Constitution and all its ratifications had been finalized. It is a change that has not been addressed and has already had consequences that have been devastating and continues to have them with increasing frequency. Because President Obama ignored all of the above information and recommendations, concealed them from everyone, did the opposite, and modified the rules of relativity to conform to his common-sense-based beliefs and authorized a scientific initiative to prove himself right after being warned repeatedly that this experiment had no logistical or physical chance of succeeding based on the theory of relativity, and all the predicted consequences of his actions have come true as described in "Obamagate, the Evidence," the conclusion that he has not abided by his oath of office, is more than justified, it has been established beyond all doubt.

Q.4: WHAT WAS "THE INFORMATION" PRESIDENT OBAMA CONCEALED FROM EVERYONE, THAT WOULD HAVE ENABLED SEC. CLINTON "TO DO HER BEST" AND "OBTAIN INFORMATION SHE NEEDED BUT DID NOT HAVE" THAT COULD HAVE PREVENTED, ABORTED OR AMELIORATED THE DEBACLE AT BENGHAZI AND HOW WAS THIS INFORMATION GIVEN TO HIM, AND WHAT DID HE DO WITH IT?

A. 4: This "Information" was given to President Obama in eight "Letters to the President" that were mailed by registered/certified mail, return receipt requested (making them legal documents and the poor man's legal notifications/subpoenas) or other trackable forms of mail, and were tracked until delivered and received.

A list of these "Letters," the URL's where their transcripts may be viewed, with a brief description of the information each letter contained can be found in Addendum I.

A list of the facts described in "The Letters" in the order in which they were discovered, and another list in which they are described in their simplest terms, is contained in Addendum II.

A list of the things President Obama and later the leaders of his Dream Team, especially Prof. Cori, Bargmann its lead Co-Chairwoman did with this information, is described in Addendum III.

The reader should read the information contained in these Addenda before reading the rest of this expose as it will enable comprehension of what is being said the best, even though one could just refer to them as needed whenever a reference is made in the text.

These addenda are long as they cover events that spanned and discoveries made insidiously during the most eventful and innovative hundred years of this civilization. The insidiousness of these events and discoveries is one of the reasons why the details revealed here, remain unknown and unappreciated at this time. The other reason is the simultaneous development of computer science and technology addressed most of the problems created by lack of awareness of these details, and addressed them eliminating the need for us to deal with them ourselves leaving only the most extreme, most tenacious and most problematic of these developments, problems that even the most sophisticated of computers and other devices cannot address, to plague us with all the disasters that are currently happening around us that no one can understand, account for or resolve using common sense and conventional wisdom (science). They are thus able to cause untold amounts of misery with no end in sight. The only thing worse is the fact that this need not have happened and can be reversed "in a jiffy" but our leaders do not want to do it for a very understandable egotistical reason. They will have to admit that they have been doing the opposite of what they should have been doing! This is the reason why Einstein's theory of relativity took twenty-five years to get the acceptance it deserved and needed.

We have been suffering the consequences of the failure to acknowledge the effects of relativity in everyday life and democratic governance by our teachers and our leaders for over twenty-five years. It is time for everyone to put ones egos aside and do what needs to be done! In this regard, the information in the Addenda, will enable comprehension of what is going to be said. More importantly, this is "The Information" described in the text as information "every man, woman and child living on this planet must become aware of to survive and succeed in our digital-atomic age" and no one will regret familiarizing oneself with it.

The main benefit of becoming aware of this "Information" is that it will enable one to use one's brain and mind as a living computer/monitor/GPS device, to do things physical computers cannot do, such as enable one to think like a genius like Einstein or like a professional person like a surgeon without being a genius or having gone to medical school, solve "problems that seem insoluble to everyone else if they are humanly possible to solve, and understand things others find it impossible to understand.

The algorithms described will enable one to engage in the "coordinated thinking" required to think faster than the speed of light by predicting the immediate future of events occurring in the present, the way weather forecasters predict the weather, and Einstein predicted events and discoveries that were going to occur in the immediate future in physics to discover relativity. Using these algorithms will enable one to avoid making mistakes that could occur at the speed of light with no warning, and cause mass destruction, as they are doing now, in our digital-atomic age, by predicting them and taking preemptive action.
And that leads to the next question ...

Q.5: WHY DOES SECRETARY CLINTON'S STATEMENT BLOW THE WHISTLE ON ALL THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES INCLUDING HERSELF AND MR. TRUMP, AND REVEAL THAT, BASED ON THE RULES OF (THE THEORY OF) RELATIVITY THAT MADE OUR DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE WHAT IT IS, NONE OF THE CANDIDATES CAN EVER WIN THE WAR ON TERRORISM, DELIVER ON ANY OF THEIR PROMISES, OR SOLVE ANY OF THE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" THAT THEY WILL BE CALLED UPON TO SOLVE, IF ELECTED?"

A. 5: Sec. Clinton's statement has blown the whistle on all the Presidential Candidates including herself and Mr. Trump and all the others who have been eliminated but could still become contenders at their respective conventions if the winners of the primaries self-destruct for any reason.
Sec. Clinton revealed that none of them can physically, mathematically, biologically or logistically win the war on terrorism, deliver on any of their promises or solve any of the other "problems that seem insoluble" in our "digital-atomic age" for the following reasons derived using the algorithms for solving problems that seem insoluble using common sense);

1. They are all promising to solve all the country's "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense after Einstein has proved beyond a doubt that common sense cannot and will not work under the three circumstances that prevail in our digital atomic age ... conditions in which information travels at the speed of light, computers process information at the same speed ... and ... disasters occur explosively at speeds approaching the speed of light. These three conditions are those under which Einstein's theory of relativity has predicted that common sense will not work, only the rules of relativity that are essentially the opposite of common sense, will work (Addendum II; and Addendum III) and ... NO PREDICTION BASED ON THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY HAS BEEN PROVED WRONG YET.

2. Because none of the Candidates have revealed any awareness of any of the following facts they must be aware of for them to succeed in any of their missions ...

a. That all the problems they will ever be called upon to solve are going to be "problems that seem (and are) insoluble" using common sense because "problems that are soluble" using common sense will be solved by others and will never need their attention;

b. None of them have ever revealed that they are aware of the existence of entities known as "problems that seem insoluble!

c. that "Problems that seem insoluble" are problems that cannot be solved using common sense no matter how long or how hard one may try;

d. That "problems that seem insoluble" can only be solved using the rules of relativity that are the opposite of the laws of common sense and

e. That the rules of relativity require one to think, say and do things that are the opposite of everything dictated by common sense followed by doing everything dictated by common sense and conventional wisdom executed with perfection, "at the speed of light," or, as fast as it is possible to execute them safely and effectively; (The steps of ASET, the shortcut for usingACTINEMAS, and other algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble are listed in Addendum II.A.v.)

f. That all problems will eventually and inevitably deteriorate into "problems that seem insoluble" that cannot be solved using common sense in our digital-atomic age. This is because modern technology makes things move faster and faster and as things happen and attain speeds that approach the speed of light, everything based on common sense will begin to fail and finally stop making things explode and disappear if this process is not reversed, aborted or harnessed and used constructively.

3. Because none of the Candidates seem to be aware of the fact that Einstein, surgeons and all professional people have solved and continue to solve "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense, by doing the opposite of everything dictated by common sense followed by the resumption of the use of common sense (executed with perfection (by using ASET)!

4. Because none of the Candidates have revealed any awareness of the fact that Surgeons and professional people have proved that continued use of common sense to solve "problems that seem insoluble," after it has failed, will eventually result in an explosive destruction of everything involved. They are all, merrily promising to deliver the sky to everyone using their own brands of common sense based plans-of-action to solve all our "problems that seem insoluble."

5. Because none of them, like Mrs. Clinton and President Obama too, have revealed awareness of the existence of algorithms professional people like her, a professional politician, are expected to use, not just to be effective, but, in addition, just to meet the requirements of their oaths of office they took upon assuming office and will take if elected and are required by law and the rules of convention to do so.

6. The most convincing proof of how deadly the use of common sense could be when used to prevent/deal with a "problem that seem insoluble" like a random act of terrorism, was provided by Mrs. Clinton herself at Benghazi, but she herself has not even realized this yet! IF WE DO NOT LEARN THIS LESSON FROM BENGHAZI, THOSE WHO DIED THERE AND ALL OUR CHILDREN WHO HAVE DIED IN PAST WARS AND IN RANDOM ACTS OF VIOLENCE LIKE SHOOL SHOOTINGS, THE SHOOTINGS AT SAN BERNARDINO AND NOW ORLANDO AND DALLAS, WOULD HAVE DIED IN VAIN!

7. Proof that common sense and war cannot enable the American President to win the war on terrorism in the long run has been proved by past Presidents from President Truman to President Obama, and most relevantly and recently by the last three Presidents, who have failed to prevent the latest wave of terrorism from becoming what it has become today. President Clinton let Osama bin Laden go free to orchestrate 9/11. President Bush allowed his "awe inspiring" deposition of Saddam Hussein to deteriorate into the insurgency and President Obama has allowed the insurgency to blossom into ISIS, "metastasize" like a cancer worldwide, allowed the debacle at Benghazi to occur, and has been totally helpless to do anything about anything including controlling random acts of violence at home that have become everyday events during his watch.

And that brings us to the next question ...

Q.6: WHAT MUST THE CANDIDATES DO IN GENERAL, BASED ON THE RULES OF RELATIVITY, TO ADDRESS THE FACT THAT SEC. CLINTON HAS BLOWN THE WHISTLE ON COMMON SENSE AND PULLED THE CARPET FROM UNDER THEM, TO GAIN THE ABILITY TO WIN THE WAR ON TERRORISM, DELIVER ON THEIR PROMISES AND TO SOLVE ALL THE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" THAT THEY ARE PROMISING TO SOLVE, AND PROVE THAT THEY CAN BECOME FUNCTIONAL AGAIN IN OUR DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE, BETWEEN NOW AND NOMINATION/ELECTION DAY?

A. 6: The answer to this question was given to President Bush and Candidate Obama in the first of "The Letters to the President" listed in Addendum I. The title of that "Letter" summarized its message. It was: "Open Letter to President Bush, the Candidates and All Americans on HOW TO WIN THE WAR ON TERROR BY ELIMINATING FALLIBILITY FROM COMMON SENSE USING "EINSTEIN'S PHILOSOPHY" ... etc., ..." This prophetic "Letter" conveyed the ten pieces of information listed in (Addendum II) to President Bush and Candidate Obama that they ignored with the predicted consequences proving the validity of the recommendations. A transcript of It is archived at http://www.successateverything.com/letter.php/ASET.
The information, advice and recommendations contained in that "Letter" were repeated in the seven more "Letters to the President" listed in Addendum I. Here are those recommendations in brief, adapted for the next President, whoever s/he may be. It does not matter who is going to be our next President. If s/he does the following, s/he will succeed. If s/he does not do these things, it does not matter what else s/he does, s/he will fail in our digital-atomic age. This is a prediction based on relativity that President Obama has proved to be true by the debacles of his Presidency and no prediction based on relativity has failed so far.

i. S/he must promise to orchestrate and orchestrate a paradigm shift in the way s/he thinks and replace his/her use of common sense and conventional wisdom to do everything s/he will do, with the use of ASET for common sense and ACTINEMASfor conventional wisdom, for solving all problems, especially those that "seem insoluble" using common sense and/or conventional wisdom" because common sense and conventional wisdom alone are not functional by themselves in our digital-atomic age. All algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble" will be functional and work only if they are piggybacked on the rules of relativity that will take over every time they fail as they do in Einstein's Philosophy, ACTINEMASand ASET and the surgeons' algorithm.

ii. S/he must promise to orchestrate, and orchestrate if elected, the same paradigm shift in the country by orchestrating a change in the way all Americans think as they solve problems, by "Imploding Einstein's I-Bomb" in America, and insuring that every man, woman and child living in America is aware of "the information" that was given to President Obama and why and how s/he must put this information to work in their country and in their private lives, and make themselves, their country, their civilization and their environment functional in the digital-atomic age.

S/he must educate her/his supporters and everyone else using the definition of education as it applies to the digital-atomic age it engineered, as given by Einstein himself when he said; "Education is not the learning of facts but the training of the mind to think" (as it solves problems), something that s/he can accomplish in a matter of minutes simply by informing everyone about ACTINEMAS and ASETthe common algorithms the brain and mind use to learn, understand, think about and deal with everything.

N.B. Instructing people how to think using principles of physics, mathematics and biology as recommended here, is not brain washing, it is education the way it should be. Telling them what to think, the way our "Professors of conventional wisdom" are doing at present in the ivory towers for teaching and learning conventional wisdom, our schools and colleges, without instructing children and students on how to think and obtain this information for themselves, is brain washing in the name of education, in the true sense of the word. It is identical to and no better than the brain washing done by cults and terrorists. The only difference is that we are hurting our own children with this method of education and making them vulnerable to brain washing by others! A brain-washed child is susceptible to brain washing by others, a child who has been taught to think on his/her own the way Einstein has prescribed is immune to brain washing by anyone. If we teach children how the brain acquires and processes information, before, during and after we impart conventional evidence-based education, our children will have, not just common sense and conventional wisdom to work with, but they will also know what to do if and when common sense and/or conventional wisdom fail, stop working, and "problems that seem insoluble" develop, as they will every time common sense is used. They will be able to acquire and process new information that becomes available with each passing moment in time, and to acquire information they need but do not have at decision-making time. They will never face the predicament Mrs. Clinton faced at Benghazi in their lives, and if they do, the will know what is the best thing s/he could do next every step of the way. In addition, they will be far more innovative, entrepreneurial, proactive and productive all the time and will be able to succeed every time success is humanly possible to achieve.

iii. S/he must promise to make and make, if elected, this paradigm shift in Congress by orchestrating a constitutional amendment that would make bipartisanship mandatory in all democratic decision-making processes involving the solution of "problems that seem insoluble" because all problems that occur in our digital atomic essentially age, are or will become, "problems that seem insoluble," for reasons already given. They must concede, or disprove and come up with a better alternative to, the fact that bipartisanship is the only method of implementing the use of ASET, the shortcut for using ACTINEMAS in the democratic decision-making process of solving problems by debating. This is why President Bush was requested to do it as the last thing he did and Candidate Obama was requested to make this amendment as the first thing he did on assuming office, and the reason why the next President must do it as the first thing s/he will do if elected if s/he does not want his/her Presidency to be an encore presentation of the Obama Presidency, only worse.

iv. Based on the three fundamental requirements just listed, S/he must recognize and abide by the following facts;

a. S/he must stop advocating and/or promising to micromanage individual "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense because "problems that seem insoluble" cannot be solved using common sense. Since there is only one way such problems can be solved and that is by using an algorithm that incorporates the rules of relativity that are contrary to the laws of common sense, they must promise instead to macro-manage all "problems that seem insoluble" as a whole proactively by addressing their common cause, the failure of common sense. They must use methods that will solve all these problems the way they can and must be solved, using relativity enabled by "the pursuit of perfection," using algorithms that incorporate the rules of relativity in them. S/he must recognize the fact that taking the steps of ACTINEMASand will make existing "problems that seem insoluble" disappear because they will solve themselves. ASET

b. S/he must stop exchanging insults, calling names, mocking personal disabilities or attributes and theatrics that insult the intelligence of the people whose votes s/he is seeking, and most importantly, BECAUSE THESE TACTICS REVEAL THAT S/HE HAS RUN OUT OF RATIONAL ARGUMENTS IN HIS/HER FAVOR AND THAT S/HE IS TOTALLY UNAWARE OF THE ABC'S OF SOLVING "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" THAT ARE THE SAME AS THE ABC'S OF MAKING POLITICALLY INCORRECT STATEMENTS" listed in (Q.10; A.10.ii.).

c. S/he must recognize and concede the fact that government based on the "opinion of the majority" is a dictatorship by the majority and that, in addition, the concept of "rule by the will of the majority" has become obsolete because it has become impossible for any concept to have a majority of believers. It must be recognized for what it is, a contradiction of the spirit of democracy and should be considered unacceptable in our digital-atomic age, an age in which the difference in numbers between the majority and the minority has become statistically insignificant, if not non-existent and opinions could and do change from moment to moment. Besides, it does not work for the simple reason that there are as many opinions in Congress as there are Congressmen and as many opinions in the country as there are people in the democracy! Therefore, this concept needs to be rescinded and replaced by the concept of rule by bipartisanship or multi-partisanship in which all opinions that matter, and all opinions matter and are therefore taken into account every time a decision is made. This in turn, must be accomplished by the unification of all opinions enabled by the use of problem-solving algorithms incorporating relativity. Such algorithms can and will, unify any and all opinions, irrespective of how many there may be, including opposites, into a single, best, functional concept that has the best chance of working and is guaranteed to work perpetually instead of a multitude of "opinions" that do not work. S/HE MUST CONCEDE THAT THIS IS THE FUNDAMENTAL DUTY OF THE PRESIDENT ESTABLISHED BY THE PRESIDENTIAL OATH, AND PROMISE TO INSURE THAT IT BECOMES SO.

. S/he must acknowledge the fact that common-sense based plans-of-action such as killing terrorists or declaring war on them, alone, will never solve the problem of terrorism and war but will make hem worse because they are "problems that seem insoluble" caused by the failure of common sense themselves. S/he must concede that killing terrorists and enemies will only increase their numbers in geometric proportions as their friends and family members become terrorists and enemies. The best and only way of getting rid of enemies forever, is to transform them into friends and allies by recognizing shared commonalities. This will increase the numbers of our friends as friends and family members of one's enemies become friends and allies.

e. S/he must concede that "problems that seem insoluble" (e.g., random acts of violence) cannot be solved or controlled by legislation (like gun-control) alone. S/he must agree that this requires legislation that insures that the root cause for their development, ignorance of how to solve "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense ... has been eradicated ... because ignorance of how to solve "problems that seem insoluble" is what prompts people to engage in random acts of violence and is the ultimate cause for terrorism. S/he must concede that this can be done only by insuring that all people are educated about the art and science of solving problems-that-seem insoluble by learning "how to think" using the algorithms their brains use to function, algorithms that enable them to use their brain-mind complexes as built in computers, monitors and GPS devices the way Einstein, surgeons, and all professional people have used theirs ... algorithms likeACTINEMAS, or the shortcut for using it, like ASET, or any better alternatives that may be conceived later ... and by making Constitutional amendments to insure that these things happen.

f. S/he must concede that Einstein, surgeons and all professional people have proved that common sense and conventional wisdom do not work in the digital-atomic age, and that only algorithms that piggyback common sense, conventional wisdom and their opposite, relativity, on one another, and/or require the pursuit of perfection defined as "doing everything one could possibly do every time one does anything that includes relativity, the opposite of everything" are the only two ways "problems that seem insoluble" can be prevented or solved.

g. S/he must concede that based on relativity that ultimately determines what works and what does not work in the digital-atomic age, that all religions are time-place-and-population specific version of relativity, discovered and/or invented and used by the authors of the scriptures and the leaders of the time, for solving "problems that seemed insoluble" any other way during their times, before Einstein discovered/ "creatively invented" relativity the same way, for our times and circumstances.

h. S/he must understand and concede that Einstein has proved in physics that things based on common sense will not work at the speed of light and will eventually stop working even otherwise and can be made to work again by piggy-backing them on relativity, and that professional people have proved that this principle also works in every-day life. Therefore, we must extend it to EVERYDAY LIFE, DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE AND RELIGION and everything else across the board and piggyback everything that stops working on relativity before attempting anything else.
And that raises the next specific question that I must ask and answer before I ask and answer any more general questions, and that is

Q.7: IF THE ALGORITHM SURGEONS USE TO DO EVERYTHING THEY DO, IS EQUIVALENT TO EINSTEIN'S PHILOSOPHY/ALGORITHM "FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSES" AS IT IS MADE OUT TO BE HERE, AND COULD HAVE ABORTED OR AMERIORATED THE DEBACLE AT BENGHAZI, THE MASSACRE AT ORLANDO, AND HELPED SOLVE ALL OUR "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE," WHY WAS DR. CARSON, A SURGEON FAMILIAR WITH THE SURGEONS' ALGORITHM, UNABLE TO SOLVE THE "PROBLEM THAT SEEMED INSOLUBLE" OF ELIMNATING MR. TRUMP?

A. 7: Dr. Carson was unable to solve the "problem that seemed insoluble" of eliminating the challenge posed by Mr. Trump using his surgeons' algorithm FOR THREE REASONS, none of which is a deficiency of the surgeons' algorithm;

i. Because he made the mother of all mistakes surgeons make, DR. CARSON DID NOT TAKE ONE OR MORE OF THE STEPS THE SURGEONS' ALGORITHM REQUIRED HIM TO TAKE! AS A MATTER OF FACT, HE TOOK NONE OF THOSE STEPS!!

Dr. Carson retired his surgeons' algorithm the day he retired from surgery. He stopped using it and started using his brand of common sense, the Republican Party's brand of conventional wisdom and his faith in his religion, the three entities that started failing the day Einstein discovered relativity, and became obsolete fifty years later.

Surgeons who fail to take a single step of the surgeons' algorithm, make a misstate that could lead to an undesirable, possibly deadly outcome in surgery that in turn, could and will, if an undesirable outcome materializes, lead to a law suit that the plaintiff will win unless the prosecuting attorney is incompetent.

Surgeons who fail to take more than one of the steps of their algorithm more than once, could and will lose their licenses sooner than later.

Those who do not take any of their steps of their algorithm, face sudden professional death as the speed of light, which is what happened to Dr. Carson.

ii. HAD DR. CARSON USED THE SURGEONS' ALGORITHM THE WAY HE SHOULD HAVE USED IT, HE WOULD HAVE TAKEN ITS FIRST STEP OF MAKING THE APPROPRIATE "POLITICALLY INCORRECT STATEMENT" ABOUT MR. TRUMP THAT HE SHOULD HAVE MADE. HAD HE DONE THAT, HE WOULD HAVE SENT MR. TRUMP BACK TO HIS REAL ESTATE BUSINESS LITERALLY WITH HIS TAIL BETWEEN HIS LEGS, THE WAY MR. TRUMP SENT ALL HIS COMPETITORS AWAY, AND, AT THE SAME TIME, DR. CARSON, WOULD HAVE MADE MR. TRUMP HIS STAUNCHEST ALLY, BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A SURGEON MAKES A POLITICALLY INCORECT STATEMENT IN REAL LIFE THE WAY IT MUST BE MADE, AS S/HE PRACTICES SURGERY!

That raises the next question ...

Q.8: WHAT IS THE POLITICALLY INCORRECT STATEMENT DR. CARSON SHOULD HAVE MADE THAT WOULD HAVE SOLVED THE "PROBLEM THAT SEEMED INSOLUBLE" TO HIM OF ELIMINATING MR. TRUMP FROM THE RACE, TO BECOME THE FRONT RUNNER HIMSELF?

A.8: To understand the answer to this question, one must know what the ABC's are for making a "politically incorrect statement. These requirements have been spelled out for Mr. Trump in "The ABC's for making politically incorrect statements in (Q.10; A.10.ii.b). Since Mr. Trump has eliminated Dr. Carson and is the front-runner and apparent nominee, and even if he was not, NO POLITICALLY IINCORRECT STAEMENT SHOULD BE MADE WITHOUT COMPLETING THE ABC'S FOR MAKING THEM IN THE SAME BREATH! So, I shall reveal the politically inappropriate statement about Mr. Trump that Dr. Carson should have made after I describe the ABC's of making such statements in section (Q.10; A.10.b) by demonstrating how Dr. Carson should have done it while dealing with Mr. Trump!

There is another reason why Dr. Carson was unable to prevail and that is the fact that he is a copycat and must be considered to be one until he can prove otherwise!

And that raises the next question ...

Q.9: WHY MUST WE CONSIDER DR. CARSON A COPYCAT?

A.9: The second reason why Dr. Carson failed, that was also not the fault of the surgeons' algorithm, is the fact that he is a copycat and must be considered one until he can prove otherwise, for the following reasons;

I. To the best of my knowledge, THE CONCEPT THAT THE SURGEONS' ALGORITHM CAN SOLVE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" IN EVRYDAY LIFE AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE" did not exist until "yours truly" described it for President Bush and Candidate Obama and justified it in the first of "The Letters to The President."

II. All the fundamental things Dr. Carson has said and done, have an uncanny similarity to the fundamental things I have said, done, in my "Letter to President Bush and the Candidates, archived at my website, and in my e-book "My Journey to ASET." In all of these writings, I have said that the surgeons' algorithm (piggybacked on Einstein's algorithm, is the algorithm the President of America must adopt and use to replace common sense as the universal problem-solving tool if we are ever to solve all the "problems that seem insoluble plaguing us as individuals, as a nation and as a civilization, years before Dr. Carson decided to make his run for the Presidency on the same premise and before he had the chance to write his book "You have a Brain." This piece of circumstantial evidence makes Dr. Carson LOOK like a copycat until he can prove otherwise.

III. By his own confession Dr. Carson has been heard to say that he was a frequent dinner guest at the Bush White House. I cannot think of anyone more eligible than he, to whom President Bush could have given the first "Letter to the President" for an opinion as to what he thought about the "rather amusing letter from a surgeon from the boondocks of Niagara Falls" who thinks that "surgeons have the answer to the question as to how we must solve 'problems that seem to defy solution' like winning the war on terror ... " during one of those dinners, and seeded the thought in his mind that he could use this idea to make a run for the Presidency himself! This makes him certainly "sound like" a copy-cat.

IV. In that "Letter" I had described for President Bush how my father taught me the algorithm I honed into ACTINEMASand made me write that "Letter" to the President the way Dr. Carson describes how his Mother inspired him to succeed and enabled him to come up with his own algorithm that underprivileged boys could use to succeed that he describes in his book. This certainly makes it "feel" as though he is a copy-cat because these things made him make a run for the Presidency the way it made me write "The Letters to the President."

V. The three questions just answered are the three questions of ASET, the algorithm for answering questions that cannot be answered and solving "problems that seem insoluble." Unifying the three answers into a concept using the fact that ASET is the commonality shared by them answers the question that seemed unanswerable that "Dr. Carson should be considered a copycat until proven otherwise."

VI. The first confirmatory vote ("test" ofACTINEMAS) of this conclusion came when Dr. Carson was tested by being confronted with the fist "problem that seemed insoluble that confronted him in the person of Mr. Trump. If he was not a copycat, and knew how to use the surgeons' algorithm outside the OR, he would have blown Mr. Trump away with one politically incorrect statement made the way it ought to be made, using the steps of ASET (the ABC's for making such statements). The fact that he flunked this first test that confirms him to be "a copycat," not the original author of this concept.

VII. The second confirmatory test came with his statement that the pyramids of Egypt were grain silos. This confirms audibly that he is a copycat because the surgeons' algorithm would never ever have given that answer to any question, no matter what the question was! When I heard him say this, I lost all the confidence I had in him.

VIII. To become our next President because he is a surgeon, Dr. Carson had to know the commonality shared by surgery, everyday life and democratic governance, the concept that would unify the three very different areas, and act as the bridge connecting them that he could use to do everything he had to do.

The way things are now, this bridge does not exist.

To build this bridge, Dr. Carson had to recognize three bridges and join them using one commonality. I recognized these bridges before writing to President Bush to be, (a) The fact that surgery consists of solving "problems that seem insoluble" in medical practice, (b) That Einstein discovered relativity to solve "problems that seem insoluble" in physics, and (c) President Bush could not solve any of the problems he had to solve in democratic governance because common sense had failed him the way Einstein predicted it would, and all the problems he had to solve were "problems that seem insoluble" that no one has been able to solve using common sense from time immemorial. President Bush was trying solve "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense and the fact that bipartisanship would have help him solve these problems made me realize that "bipartisanship" is the answer to the question "How can one solve 'problems that seem insoluble' in democratic governance using relativity"

Long before that my interest in surgery and relativity had made me realize that Einstein's Philosophy and the surgeons' algorithm were identical with the difference that one step was missing from each that was there in the other, and that I could overcome both deficiencies by piggy backing (mating) the two on one another to get ACTINMAS, something I was able to do because I was familiar with surgery and physics (relativity).

It was this sequence of events that made me write to President Bush. Dr. Carson could not use this story that I had told in my "Letter" without being accused of plagiarism that would lead to ostrasization and ended his campaign and any University affiliations he may still have. The algorithm he had derived based on his mother's advice and common sense, like President Obama's common sense based BRAIN 2025 Initiative, will be vaporized by things moving and happening at the speed of light a speed at which only an algorithm piggybacked on relativity, will work. The surgeons' algorithm alone, as versatile as it is, also will not work unless it is mated with relativity.

Dr. Carson, President Obama and Prof. Francis Collins and Prof. Cori Bargmann, leaders of President Obama's Dream Team all have one thing in common. None of them is familiar with relativity, awareness of which is required for survival and success in our digital atomic age. Therefore, the second reason why Dr. Carson had to quit must be considered to be the fact that he was a copycat, until he can prove it to be otherwise

Sec. Clinton proved how deadly common sense could be, when used alone, to prevent random acts of violence/terrorism (they are the same scientifically, mathematically and biologically regardless of what she, a person not qualified to make this assessment, has said to the contrary) at Benghazi. Dr. Carson proved how deadly (suicidal, intellectually if not physically) it could be when used to solve personal "problems that seem insoluble" in one's personal or public affairs.

If. Dr. Carson still says he is not a copycat, maybe an accidental one, I shall apologize and not argue with him because it then enters the realms of irrelevance.

And that raises the next Question ...

Q.10: IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT MRS. CLINTON HAS BLOWN THE WHISTLE ON ALL OF THEM, WHAT SHOULD THE INDIVIDUAL CANDIDATES DO SPECIFICALLLY, IN ADDITION TO THE GENERAL MEASURES LISTED ABOVE, TO MAKE THEMSELVES VIABLE CANDIDATES WHO COULD BECOME THE FIRST EFFECTIVE PRESIDENT OF THE DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE, IF ELECTED, BASED ON THE RULES OF RELATIVITY THAT DEFINE OUR DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE AND DETERMINE WHAT HAPPENS IN IT?

A. 10. Here are the specific things each of the Candidates must do if s/he wants to become the candidate most likely to become the first successful President in our Digital-atomic age. "We the people" must then decide who has "done her/his best" to solve this "problem that seems impossible" of making this transition that has been tossed in their lap at such a short notice.

I shall begin with Mrs. Clinton because she is the one who blew the whistle on everyone and everything, if not for any other reason. In our digital-atomic age, it really does not matter who we elect into office. What matters is what that person will do on getting elected with special reference to how s/he will solve "problems that seem insoluble."

i.MRS.CLINTON. Based on what has been said so far, Mrs. Clinton must take the following steps in addition to the general steps enumerated earlier, steps that are specific for her, and promise to follow through on them if elected and be believable in doing so.

a) She must concede that the Benghazi debacle has proved how deadly the use of common sense could be when used to prevent random acts of terrorism and/or violence, that there is no difference between the two as far as prevention and control are concerned as she has maintained, as both are "problems that seem insoluble" and require the same steps for prevention, management and solution. She will have to inculpate herself but she must be given one chance to reprieve herself using the only argument based on the rules of relativity, ACTINEMASand ASET that can absolve her. She must determine for herself what that argument is.

b) She must acknowledge the role President Obama has played in the debacle and insist that he accept responsibility for the same, apologize, respond to, redress and remedy the issues raised and the allegations made in "Obamagate, The Evidence."

c) She must stop promising to use common sense to do everything she will do if elected, the way she is doing now, as it is the deadliest thing she could promise to do. She is a professional politician and she must start using professional algorithms used by and expected of, all professional people, to insure she meets the standards of due diligence that would be expected of her when she takes her oath of office if elected, and she might as well start now. Unlike President Obama, she must promise to pursue perfection if elected, not avoid her responsibility by saying that she was "not sent to Washington to be perfect."

d) She must stop promising to preserve, protect and promote President Obama's common-sense-based "accomplishments." She must recognize them to be what they are, disasters and "catch 22" propositions waiting to explode. She must promise to defuse them beginning with "Obamacare," and, implode (dismantle) them, and make them concepts that will be viable and functional in the digital atomic age and beyond, by piggybacking them on reality and relativity, accomplished in turn by piggybacking them on algorithms based on reality and relativity like ACTINEMASand ASET. She must not repeal Obamacare. It must be made what it should be by a Congress that has been rejuvenated by the orchestration of the Amendment that will make bipartisanship (the use ASET ) mandatory in all decision-making processes for solving problems that seem insoluble;

e) She must stop criticizing Mr. Trump for making politically incorrect statements because making the appropriate politically incorrect statement is the first step of all professional algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble" and all the problems she will have to solve are going to be such problems. If she continues to be critical of such statements, it will be evidence that she has not comprehended the ABC's of solving "problems that seem insoluble" as described for Mr. Trump in
(Q.10; A.10.ii.c.) below, and she must be considered unqualified for the job she is seeking. She must actually show that she can do a better job of making such statements than Mr. Trump and that she can and will make politically incorrect statements whenever needed!

f) She must promise to "MAKE THE CHANGE" (the paradigm shift and the Constitutional Amendment) President Obama was requested to make, promised to make but did not, and make it if elected.

g) She should make it her goal to be the first successful President who happens to be female, not the first female President to flop!

ii. MR. DONALD TRUMP. In view of what has been said so far, based on the effects of Einstein's theory of relativity as it applies to events happening at the speed of light in everyday life and democratic governance, Mr. Trump must take the following steps to be able to win the war on terrorism, prevent random acts of violence and solve all the other "problems that seem insoluble" at this time, by addressing them at their roots and deliver on his promises if elected;

a) HE MUST RESPOND TO SEC. CLINTON'S WHISTLE-BLOWING STATEMENT ON COMMON SENSE: Since Sec. Clinton has blown the whistle on Mr. Trump's ability deliver on his promises based on his brand of common sense, that of the successful businessman/builder/developer, the first thing he must do is to demonstrate that he has regained his ability to succeed in the digital-atomic age by satisfying all the criteria described in general for all the Candidates in (Q.5; A.5.). He must make himself maximally functional based on the both the laws of nature and the rules of relativity, as they flip-flop to determine everything that will happen during his Presidency, if elected. (He must demonstrate his ability to use ASET)

b) HE MUST RESPOND TO THE POLITICALLY INCORRECT STATEMENT ABOUT HIM THAT DR. CARSON SHOULD HAVE MADE AS DICTATED BY THE SURGEONS' ALGORITHM THAT WOULD HAVE SENT HIM (MR. TRUMP) HOME "LITERALLY WITH HIS TAIL BETWEEN HIS LEGS" AND ENDED HIS RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY. SINCE DR. CARSON DID NOT MAKE IT, I AM GOING TO MAKE IT NOW OBSERVING THE ABC'S FOR MAKING SUCH STATEMENTS! I shall demonstrate how a politically incorrect statement must be made by throwing "an orchestrated temper tantrum" that was known to my colleagues as one of my "trademarks" that I had developed and used in my practice as I am sure Dr. Carson has too that he retired with his retirement from practice.

Even though the primaries are over and Dr. Carson is out of the race, Mr. Trump must still respond and refute this statement because I am going to make it as I have the obligation to do so as a responsible surgeon, the same reason that compelled me to write the first of "the Letters to The President" to President Bush, and all those I wrote to President Obama, and made me post my YouTube clip on "Einstein's I-Bomb" that can be viewed at http://www.successateverything.com/einstein.php or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvb69nSpGL4. Since President Obama did not "implode Einstein's I-Bomb" as requested in that clip, I shall implode it with this expose.

Here is the statement the surgeons' algorithm required Dr. Carson to make after Mr. Trump had made his third "politically incorrect statement" inappropriately during the primary debates.

Mr. Trump must respond and rebut this statement if he can and if he cannot, he must accept the recommendations made because this statement is the most appropriate, "politically inappropriate statement" about him that someone must make at this time, that no one is making, one that only a surgeon who knows how to make politically inappropriate/incorrect statements most appropriately and therapeutically, can make.

He must respond, if not for any other reason other than to clear his own conscience that he is qualified and able to do what he has taken upon himself.

The statement Dr. Carson should have made was and is that Mr. Trump is "a loud mouthed bully who has no idea about the ABC's of making politically inappropriate statements professionally, who terrorized a group of Republican Presidential Candidates by making such statements about them and succeeded because his victims were being gentlemanly when it was inappropriate to be gentlemanly, allowing him to engineer a hostile take-over"

By not saying what needed to be said because it was politically inappropriate to do so, the Dr. Carson, Republican Party Candidates and all his opponents have demonstrated the fundamental reason why such statements must be made and delivered with both the right amount of "thunder" and the right "substance" required to solve "problems that seem insoluble" like the fact that Mr. Trump has the thunder but not the substance required. Mr. Trump was right in saying that politically incorrect statements must be made to solve "problems that seem insoluble" and "make America great again," because of the unwritten principle for solving such problems '''

"WHAT MUST BE SAID MUST BE SAID, BEFORE WHAT MUST BE DONE CAN BE DONE."

That leads to the question as to "What are the ...

c.THE ABCs of making politically incorrect/inappropriate statements?'"

A. The "A" is for Announcement. The person making such statements must announce that s/he is going to make a "politically incorrect statement" and state the precise reason for making it before and after making it, and as often as necessary as needed.

There is only one good reason for making such a statement and three corollaries to it. They are;

... To recognize the fundamental cause of the "problem that seems insoluble" that must be recognized, defined and stated with absolute precision, specificity and clarity before such problems can be solved. It is impossible to do this without offending almost everyone who hears it for many reasons, none of which is more important than the fact that it has to be made before that problem that seems insoluble can be solved, and it must be solved before things get out of hand. There are no other alternatives; the solving of a "problem that seems insoluble" is a "surgical operation."

... Because, failure to make that statement and the failure to solve that problem and allowing it to fester, have far worse consequences for everyone and will physically hurt the very people whose feelings are intended to be protected by the prohibition to make such statements.

... Because it is the first step of all algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble" ASET, ACTINEMAS, the surgeons' algorithm, Einstein's Algorithm, and all professional algorithms. Forbidding everyone from taking the first step for solving "problems that seem insoluble" the way common sense does, effectively prevents anyone from ever, EVER, solving any "problem that seems insoluble" forever! This is a "no-brainer" with no if's or but's!

... Because solving any "problem that seem insoluble" requires one to do things that are contrary to the dictates of common sense.

The prohibition by common sense preventing one from making such statements makes the solution of such problems using common sense, the prime example of a "catch 22" proposition and a vicious cycle that must be broken by imploding it (by ignoring all the dictates of common sense as Einstein did as his first step,) if such problems are ever to be solved.

Since common sense and "catch 22" propositions are ideas that exists in the minds of people that needs to be interrupted and reversed, these things have to be imploded intentionally using an "Intellectual Bomb" or "I-Bomb."

The first example of such a "bomb" was the one Einstein imploded to discover relativity by making one of the first politically incorrect statements made by a scientist, the statement of the fact that the "common sense" that all the VIP's of society, political and religious leaders and professors of conventional wisdom considered inviolable and infallible, common sense (and conventional wisdom), "is (are) unreliable and fallible."

It took him a quarter of a century to make it stick, and it was accepted only after each and every bizarre prediction he made using his theory of relativity had come true. Since then, Einstein's method has been adapted and adopted by professional people for whom it has worked for the last hundred years and there is no reason why it should not work for us, or for us to look for another method at this time.

Anyone can "implode Einstein's I-bomb" in a given situation simply by "ignoring all the dictates of common sense and conventional wisdom and making the "appropriate," "politically incorrect/inappropriate statement contrary to the dictates of common sense and conventional wisdom, provided one knows how it must be done!" otherwise it could be suicidal.

B. "B" stands for "Back off.

As soon as one makes a "politically incorrect/inappropriate statement" and "the I-Bomb" starts to explode in the minds of all listeners, one must immediately back off and convert these potentially uncontrollable explosions into controllable implosions. Otherwise, these explosions will become uncontrollable and destroy everything the way each of Mr. Trump's statements is doing and will do. This will happen unless he learns how to control and harnesses them and use the energies released, constructively to solve the problems he must solve after he makes each such statement and complete the process, before it is too late. (Punching those who disagree with him in the face is not an option.)

One of the problems Mr. Trump has created for himself is that he has made such statements where there was no "problem that seemed insoluble" to be solved except that of getting rid of people he wanted to get rid of but could not get rid of any other way. He should have gotten rid of them by making the appropriate politically incorrect statements determined by using one of the algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble" but he couldn't because he was not aware of those methods and had not developed one for himself.

Backing off will require any and/or all of the following;
... Apologizing for making the statement for having hurt/offended peoples' feelings,
... reiterating the reason/s why the statement was made, because making it was the "A" for making such statements and solving "problems that seem insoluble."
... reinforcement of the fact that it was made as an "act of tough love," an effort by those who are able to solve "problems that seem insoluble" to help those who are unable to do so for any reason, to solve those problems with no expectations in return of any kind other than that they learn how to solve such problems in the future and become self-sufficient in this regard.
... The step of backing off must be completed theoretically "at the speed of light." In practice, it must be done as fast as it can be done efficiently, by completing the process and solving the "problem that seemed insoluble" by doing everything that is humanly possible to do executed with perfection (the pursuit of perfection with speed and efficiency).

The making of the politically incorrect statement appropriately by saying everything that is the opposite of everything dictated by common sense, must be said rapidly and efficiently, and will complete the first step of ASET or the first three steps of ACTINEMASthat require one to say and do everything that is the opposite of the dictates of common sense. This will "ignite the fuse" of the "Intellectual Bomb" or the "I-Bomb" in the minds of everyone who hears this statement and in the mind of the person making the statement and make the paradigm shift required to solve the "problem that seems insoluble."

The implosion of the I-Bomb makes things that were gridlocked and immobile in the minds of people, start moving again. Saying and doing all things that are the opposite of the dictates of common sense will reverse the effects of all the common-sense-based actions that made the "problem that seemed insoluble" become insoluble, and make the problem soluble again using common sense for a moment in time, before the implosion of the I-bomb will fizzle out and the "problem that seemed insoluble" will become insoluble again, or the implosion will become an uncontrollable explosion that will destroy everything and could take things beyond the point of no return!

ASETThis will convert the explosion of the I-Bomb into an implosion and extinguish (abort) it, and solve the problem that has become amenable to solution using common sense in the momentary window in time, and taking the steps required by common sense and conventional wisdom in that window will solve it.

In reality, one does not have to do everything at the speed of light, something that is impossible to do anyway, but one must complete the process once one has started it. It is like performing a surgical operation. The surgeon cannot cut open someone's body and leave to return later before to complete the procedure. The procedure must be completed with no regard to how long it will take.

It is important to engage in "the pursuit of perfection" and take all the steps of ACTINEMASor ASET rapidly and with perfection because the moment one takes the first step and starts the process, the I-Bomb will start to explode.

It will destroy everything "at the speed of light" the speed at which explosions occur and all one has is therefore one moment in time to convert that explosion into an implosion, end it, and solve the problem, otherwise the problem that had become soluble for a moment will become insoluble again or explode and destroy everything!

There is no time to think, make decisions, take one's own time to act slowly. Everything must be done these things must have been done preemptively. If one fails to take a single one of the steps of the algorithms for solving such problems, the old problem may not get solved. If it does get solved, a new problem caused by the failure to take that one step may develop and make the outcome less than desirable.

This is why "the pursuit of perfection" is defined as "doing everything one could possibly do" and vice versa.

The authors of our Constitution realized this and that is why they worded the Presidential Oath of Office the way they did. They did the best they could in wording it because the term "pursuit of perfection" did not exist when the Constitution was written and the existence of "problems that seem insoluble" also had not been recognized. It is now up to us and our next President to do our best since our current President has vacated his oath soon after taking it!

Last but not least, "backing off" will convert people who are upset or have become enemies by the "politically inappropriate statement" that was made, back to being friends and allies without giving them time, chance or reason to protest.

C. "C" stands for Completion of the process by the recognition of "Commonalities." This step consists of recognizing the commonalities shared by everything in existence including opposites and using them to unify everything (all the factors and forces recognized by the steps of the algorithms used. In practice, it consists of taking the third step of ASET or the three remaining steps of ACTINEMAS (the steps of conventional wisdom) that require recognition of the commonalities shared by all the pieces of information obtained by the previous steps of ACTINEMASand/or ASET.

When this is done, the biological computer that the brain-mind complex is, will take over and unify (process) all the information that has been obtained, using the recognized commonalities, into concepts that will enable the comprehension of the problem, and the formulation of the best plan-of-action possible under the circumstances to solve it.

This plan will then be prompted as the plan-of-action that shows up in one's mind and prompts one to do things. If one took all the steps of an algorithm that enables success, one will have the best chance of solving the problem at hand. When this plan is implemented, the problem will solve itself if it is humanly possible to solve it.

Repeating these steps if needed will keep those problems solved and prevent new ones from developing.

The "shared commonalities" are the laws of common sense and conventional wisdom or essentially Newtonian laws of motion, that are shared by everything that is not moving or happening at the speed of light, and the rules of relativity, the opposites of these laws, that are shared by everything that is moving or occurring at the speed of light and by all "problems that seem insoluble."

It is obvious from what has been said that it should not take more than a moment in time to solve a "problem that seems insoluble (intellectually)," the time it takes to make the appropriate "politically incorrect statement" and do everything that is dictated by the algorithm being used before that implosion fizzles out or becomes an explosion and destroys everything.

Therefore, anyone, like the leaders of President Obama's Dream Team, who says that one needs ten years to solve the "problem that seems insoluble" like map the human brain as it functions to figure out the algorithm the brain uses to think, has no idea of how to solve such problems, even if s/he is the President, Director of the NIH, or a professor at the leading Ivy League University!

It took Einstein one moment in time to figure out how his mind worked and did it the moment he figured out what the question was that he had to ask. The moment he asked it, his mind answered it because our minds have been programmed at birth to do this by Mother Nature at the speed of light, the speed at which thoughts travel in our minds and electrical impulses travel though our bodies! If Mother Nature does not do this for us, we have to do it ourselves the way Einstein did by deliberately asking and answering the required questions that our brains ask and answer as it thinks.


After making this statement about Mr. Trump, Dr. Carson should have completed the "B" (back off) for making this statement by immediately justifying it "at the speed of light" before the "Intellectual Bomb" he would ignite in Mr. Trump's brain could explode and destroy everything, by converting it into an implosion that he could defuse by giving Mr. Trump the praise that was and is overdue to him for having recognized the fact that we need to start making "politically incorrect statements if we want to solve our problems and that the time for doing this came and went a long time ago.

Finally, Dr. Carson should have completed the process of defusing the I-Bomb he would have imploded in everyone's mind including Mr. Trump's by completing the "C" (completion by recognition of shared commonalities) for making such statements and informing everyone about the common algorithms surgeons use to solve such problems in surgery and how he would use it to solve the country's problems and using this opportunity to give everyone a crash course on the ABC's for making such statements that would also be equivalent to giving everyone a crash course on the steps of ASET, as it was just done.

I did not publish this information earlier because Dr. Carson would not be an effective President if he could not defuse the challenge posed by Mr. Trump by himself something he would have been able to do if he was not a copycat as the evidence presented in (A.8.vi.e).) seems to suggest.

And that raises the next question ...


a.HOW CAN MR.TRUMP SOLVE THE 'PROBLEM THAT SEEMS INSOLUBLE' OF REVERSING THE SITUATION HE IS IN THAT COULD EXPLODE AND DESTROY HIM, AND TURBO CHARGE HIS CAMPAIGN, MAXIMIZE HIS ABILITY TO WIN THE ELECTION AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM AND SOLVE ALL THE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE," AND MAXIMIZE HIS CHANCES OF BECOMING THE FIRST MAXIMALLY SUCCESSFUL PRESIDENT OF THE DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE AND DELIVER ON HIS PROMISE "TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN?

The answer is HE MUST PIGGYBACK HIMSELF ON RELATIVITY BY STARTING TO USE ONE OF THE ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" THAT INCORPORATE THE RULES OF RELATIVITY IN THEM AND PROVIDE THE SUBSTANCE THAT IS MISSING FROM HIS THUNDER!

He must begin by responding to the politically incorrect statement that was made about him in (b) above, with the most appropriate and irrefutable response. Calling me names or insulting me, or making personal derogative terms will not be acceptable. At the same time, he must solve the "problem that seems insoluble" of turning his campaign around from the rut it is in at present. He must eliminate almost all the opposition he is encountering by making an honest effort to transform all his enemies into friends and allies, and propel himself from the brink of the black hole he is at risk of falling into, EVEN IF HE WINS THE ELECTION, and zoom off to success beyond the reach of anyone else, and he must do it all at a moment's notice!

The good news for Mr. Trump is that he can accomplish all of the above simply by doing what he was invited to do on Sept 29, 2015 in my tweeted invitation to him. Had he heeded that tweet at that time, he would not be in the mess he is in now. Now that he is in that mess as predicted by that tweet, he can still propel himself out of it by doing what the tweet tweeted. That tweet suggested that he should "trade in his trade mark," of making destructive "politically incorrect/inappropriate statements" followed by telling those he has offended, the equivalent of "You're fired," his trade mark, for my trade mark of ACTINEMAS, the algorithm for success at everything including making politically incorrect statements appropriately and solving all "problems that seem insoluble" any other way, using the methods used by surgeons and all professional people to solve all "problems that seem insoluble" that are humanly possible to solve, piggybacked on Einstein's Algorithm for solving such problems in physics to make it applicable universally.

The exact words of the tweet were "Mr. Trump, prove me wrong or please trade in your trade mark for mine or you're (you will be) fired (by "we the people,") plus the URL to the blog of the same title http://www.successateverything.com/blog/130 that elaborated on this concept.

Adopting ACTINEMASat this time will turbo charge his thunder without substance by providing him with the substance he needs!

And that brings us to the next attribute Mr. Trump needs and has shown that he has it in him but he is not using it yet to the extent he must, and that is ...

THE ART AND SCIENCE OF FLIP FLOPPING.

Common sense and conventional wisdom consider flip-flopping a weakness and forbid it but when one is dealing with "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense that can only be solved by doing things that are contrary to the dictates of common sense, followed by doing everything dictated by common sense and going back and forth between these two sets of steps at the "speed of light," flip-flopping becomes the thing to do to implement all the opposing philosophies for solving "problems that seem insoluble!" It is the fourth step of ASET that requires one to recognize the rules of relativity and the laws of common sense that are opposites, alternately essentially flip-flopping between the two sets of commonalities and making them unify all the information provided by the use of the algorithm, into a single functioning unit or plan-of-action for solving the problem being solved.

Flip-flopping rapidly and repeatedly between the laws of common sense and the rules of relativity rapidly, as a "mantra" going on continuously in the background of one's mind creates an environment in one's internal intellectual and external physical environment where the products of the implosion of the I-Bomb intellectually and physically can unify or be unified at the speed of light and create an environment in which problems of all kinds solve themselves and new problems do not occur, or will be solved preemptively, or as soon as they occur, before they can do any damage.

In real life, these things go on spontaneously. If everyone takes the steps of the algorithms for the pursuit of perfection continuously and insures that one is obtaining all the pieces of information our minds need to work as they become available on an ongoing basis and keep ourselves aware of the laws of common sense and the rules of relativity continuously by acquiring them and storing them in the memories of our minds, our minds will do what needs to be done without special effort on our part because they were programmed to do this at birth.

From what has been said, it is obvious that Mr. Trump has three of the most important assets needed for one to become the first most functional President of our digital atomic age ...
... The audacity to make "politically incorrect statements" with carefree abandon,
... The thunder required to deliver those statements with the required force to be effective; (Mr. Trump has the thunder but he does not have the substance, a deficiency he can correct instantaneously by him if he adopts my trade mark, ACTINEMAS, whereas Dr. Carson had the substance afforded by his surgeons' algorithm that he left at home unfortunately, but he just did not have the thunder to be effective), and ...
... The ability to flip-flop!
Mr. Trump is the one who is best equipped to become the most successful President of the digital-atomic age who could solve all the "problems that seem insoluble" like win the war on terrorism, random acts of violence and all the rest, provided he does what has been recommended here so that he may obtain the ammunition he needs to replace the blanks he has been firing until now from his politically incorrect cannon. If he does not do this, he will become the loose cannon his opponents are calling him.

c. EVALUATION OF MR. TRUMPS PROPOSITION TO BUILD A TO PREVENT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION USING THE RULES OF RELATIVITY ENABLED BY ACTNEMAS, THE ALGORITHM FOR THE PURSUIT OF PERFECTION WHILE SOLVING "PROBLEMS THT SEEM INSOLUBLE"

Mr. Trump must realize and acknowledge the fact that his plan of building a physical wall to address the "problem that seems insoluble," of illegal immigration, is a common sense-based plan to solve a problem caused by the failure of common sense, making it a "catch 22" proposition that cannot work, no matter how high or how thick his wall will be. I addition, it will make matters worse.

People are flooding over our borders because they cannot solve their own "problems that seem insoluble" on their side of the fence and think we have solutions for their problems. We don't. if we learn how to solve our own "problems that seem insoluble," and teach the world how to do the same for themselves, they will start solving their own problems. They will stop coming here and making things worse for themselves and us. They will go back to their homes and may even start helping us solve our problems, and we will not need any walls.

This "problem that seems insoluble" like all others, has been caused by the failures of common sense and can only be solved using relativity-based algorithms, and by doing the opposite of everything dictated by common sense and by "imploding the I-Bomb," and disseminating information in our country and in the world informing everyone about "problems that seem insoluble" and how they can and must be solved, and by talking all the steps of ACTINEMASourselves to solve our own problems.

Once everyone is aware of how "problems that seem insoluble" can and must be solved and everyone is aware of the steps of algorithms for solving such problems, ACTINEMAS will dictate when and what kind of wall we must build, if at all, and the specifics of that wall that we must build as one of the steps of the algorithm, not as the only step.

Building a wall before solving the problems caused by the universal ignorance of how to solve "problems that seem insoluble" will only make matters worse.

For starters, neither Congress nor "we the people" will allow Mr. Trump to do anything irrespective of what he wants to do the way they have prevented our last few Presidents from doing anything. Besides, people will find ways to get around everything Mr. Trump may do including digging tunnels to bypass his wall.

d. BEFORE BUILDING A BRICK AND MORTAR WALL COMMON SENSE TELLS HIM TO BUILD, RELATIVITY DICTATES THAT MR. TRUMP MUST DO THE OPPOSITE. HE MUST TAKE DOWN THE INTELLECTUAL WALLS PREVENING THE SOLUTION OF "PROBLEM THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE," THE WALLS OF IVORY TOWERS OF CONVENTIONAL WISDOM THAT RELATIVITY DICTATES HE MUST TAKE DOWN BEFORE HE CAN SOLVE A SINGLE "PROBLEM THAT SEEMS INSOLUBLE"

Before building the brick and mortar wall his that brand of common sense is prompting him to build to control illegal immigration, or the legislative wall to exclude religion-based terrorism, both "problems that seem insoluble," that common sense cannot solve, Mr. Trump must take down the intellectual walls that are preventing him and everyone else from solving any "problem that seems insoluble" in the first place!

The intellectual walls responsible for the development, propagation, and preservation of all "problems that seem insoluble," and allowing them to proliferate and profligate, are the "intellectual walls" of the Ivory Towers of the Rockefeller Institute, Stanford University, The NIH and the White House, behind which the Leaders of President Obama's Dream team and he himself have barricaded themselves after allowing President Obama to plagiarize, bastardize and castrate the scientific concept of "relativity," the only concept that could have solved all "problems that seem insoluble" instantaneously, three years ago, when he first contacted them. These "University Professors" do not want to, and/or cannot acknowledge the fact that relativity is the fundamental cause for all "problem that seem insoluble" including the experiment on which they have pinned all their hopes and the hope of President Obama's BRAIN Mapping Initiative, for egotistical, and fiduciary reasons detailed in "Obamagate, The Evidence" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100.

Their common-sense based plan to perform a common sense-based experiment to determine how the brain works as it thinks, is identical, for physical, mathematical and logistical reasons, to the Michelson-Morley experiment that failed, did not work and gave a "null result" and became the third "problem that seem insoluble" that made Einstein realize that he had to discover relativity. He made physicists abandon experimentation in this direction, because "relativity" predicts that such experiments, have no logistical chance of working. That's the bad news. The good news is that this information concerning how the brain works as it thinks, already exists, having been developed by Einstein, surgeons and all professional people and there is no need to determine this information physically and it does not matter if it cannot be determined physically, because we have a method that works and has been proved to be reliable by the totality of the human experience on this planet for the last hundred years.

That futile experiment just alluded to is President Obama's and Prof. Cori Bargmann's experiment on which the "BRAIN 2025 Initiative," is founded on and Mr. Trump must implode it by requiring President Obama, Prof Bargmann, and the Leaders of their "Dream Team" to respond to and refute the allegations made in "Obamagate, the Evidence," or apologize and accept its recommendations, and redeem themselves by doing what has been recommended, without further delay. The three years that have already elapsed since the allegations were first made is long enough and further delay is unconscionable because the information they are withholding from the public is the information required for the American President and the American people to win the war on terrorism, prevent random acts of violence and solve all the other "problems that seem insoluble" that we are unable to solve at this time, this consideration makes the Dream Team responsible for perpetuating all our current nightmares including the massacres of innocent people that have become daily events.

e.BEFORE TAKING LEGISLATIVE ACTION TO CURB RELIGION-BASED TERRORISM, MR. TRUMP MUST PROVIDE A PLATFORM FOR ALL THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD TO UNIFY BASED ON THE FACT THAT ALL RELIGIONS ARE ESSENTIALLY TIME/PLACE/AND PEOPLE SPECIFIC VERSIONS OF RELATIVITY CREATED BY THE AUTHORS OF THE SCRIPTURES THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO FOR SOLVING "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" AND WERE TO THEM WHAT RELATIVITY IS TO US!

Mr. Trump's plans to control religion-based terrorism by legislative control of Muslim immigration will not work because all problems caused by religious beliefs are fundamentally "problems that seems insoluble" using common sense.

Evaluation of all the philosophies of all the religions using ACTINEMAS as the common denominator, reveals that they are all philosophies for solving "problems that seem insoluble" using the prevailing versions of common sense, creatively discovered/invented by religious leaders of the time the way Einstein creatively discovered/invented relativity, to solve "problems that could not be solved any other way" in their times. This makes all religions, age-, region- and people-specific versions of relativity. This thought provides people of all faiths, and their leaders, a common platform on which they can meet and mingle as equal human beings, a common platform on which all religions can be as different as they are/want to be and at the same time, be as similar, with no questions asked and exchange ideas for revitalizing algorithms that have stopped working after the discovery of relativity. On this platform, people can solve all problems, those that are soluble using common sense and those that seem insoluble using common sense. They can use a single algorithm that is actually common to all the religions and the sciences, transcends all differences and unifies everything including opposites, and makes everything work together in perfect harmony using the commonalities shared by everything in existence, the laws of common sense and the rules of relativity forced to work together by flip-flopping between one another at the constant speed of light.

Therefore, Mr. Trump must acknowledge and accept or refute and come up with a better alternative to the above concept that was generated by using ACTINEMAS and ASET that religion-based "problems that seem insoluble" can be solved by unification of all the philosophies of all religions and all sciences, functionally, by recognizing the philosophical commonality they share, ACTINEMAS, the algorithm for the pursuit of perfection.

f. POTPURRI OF MISCELLANEOUS THOUGHTS FOR MR. TRUMP (AND/OR THE NEXT PRESIDENT), TO KEEP IN MIND

i. Mr. Trump must not resort to plagiarism like President Obama or become a copycat like Dr. Carson for obtaining information, algorithms and or ideas for solving "problems that seem insoluble" that he needs, to provide him with the substance to go with the thunder of his "politically incorrect statements." Both these gimmicks will explode in his face. He does not have the time required to derive such an algorithm on his own and there is none other than the five described here, in existence. He should just hitch a ride on the works, reputations, accomplishments and experiences of Einstein, Surgeons, professional people, yours truly and his father. I promise not to make any demands, monetary or otherwise except that he must give credit, where credit is due, and insist that he does not bastardize the algorithms he borrows because it will make them non-functional instantaneously. They have zero tolerance for modification as President Obama has proved so eminently at the expense of the nation and the civilization, and eight precious years he has wasted. Mr. Trump has my permission to use ACTINEMAS and ASET as long as he uses them for the good of the public and not for commercial purposes or personal gain.

ii. Mr. Trump has more recently acquired the second asset required for solving "problems that seem insoluble" using ASET the shortcut for usingACTINEMAS, the talent to flip-flop! He must hone it into an art and a science because that is what he must do to use ASET rapidly and repeatedly to get rid of all the "problems that seem insoluble he has gathered on his way to nomination. Then, he will have to do it every step of the way from this point on to unify all the opposing factors and forces working against one another to create chaos that could destroy us. He must whip them all together into a single force that will take us where we must go by generating thought processes similar to the way laser beams are generated

iii. ACTINEMASwill help Mr. Trump and/or the next President, to determine precisely what to say and do each step of the way in our digital-atomic age without creating enemies, minimizing mistakes, or creating explosive situations. It will eliminate the need for using personal insults, slurs, mockery of any kind, calling names and shouting and using politically incorrect statements as weapons to attack opponents as all these tactics reveal that one has run out of reasonable arguments to support one's thoughts, words and actions. ACTINEMASwill give him all the reasonable arguments available for every situation, present, past and future. The only way Mr. Trump can do this is by trading in his trade mark of "you're fired" for mine, ACTINEMAS. As stated earlier, he has my permission to use it provided, he gives credit where credit is due, to the people who helped develop it and that is where we started these considerations.

I do not personally agree with anything specific Mr. Trump is saying or doing using his brand of common sense that is not in agreement with ACTINEMASbut the fact remains that he is the only one in the race who has started doing the two things someone must do to reverse the downward spiral we are in today. All the others contestants who are not in the race but could become contenders at the Convention, and other outsiders who may enter the picture, hold the promise of using their own personal brands of common sense and common sense is what got us in the mess we are in in the first place. They will all get us into deeper trouble very fast. It will be the greatest tragedy of this civilization if Mr. Trump and those who oppose him do not realize what has been said here, come together, and do what we must all do to help him or whoever is willing to challenge him to do what someone must do to reverse the undesirable trends prevailing now. In this regard, there is information to be gleaned from the candidacies of all the other Candidates who are out of the race, about solving "problems that seem insoluble" in our digital-atomic age. A brief summary of these considerations follows.
I shall begin with Sen Marco Rubio because the dominoes Sec. Clinton toppled with her fateful statement that blew the whistle on Sen. Rubio's ability to solve any of the "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense, has also inculpated him in the Orlando Massacre because he failed to act upon a petition that could have prevented it.

iii. SEN. MARCO RUBIO:

Sec. Clinton blew the whistle on Sen. Rubio on two counts.

a. Since Sen. Rubio was promising to do everything he was going to do using his brand of common sense, the Republican Party Brand of conventional wisdom and his faith in his religion, Sec. Clinton pulled the
carpet from under him by proving that common sense does not work in our digital-atomic age.

b. With the chain reaction she set off with her pan-whistle-blowing statement, Sec. Clinton blew the whistle on Sen. Rubio a second time and inculpated him and President Obama in the Orlando Massacre because "Obamagate the Evidence" was submitted to him for action in the Senate, and to Cong. Grayson, ex-Speaker John Boehner, Sen. Barbara Boxer, and Cong, Michael Conway, Chairpersons of the Senate and House Ethics Committees for action, almost a year ago,) and he and the others ignored it.

iv.. SEN. BERNIE SANDERS:

Sen. Sanders campaign revealed the following ten facts;

a. 'Mrs. Clinton's fateful statement blew the whistle on Sen. Sanders because he too promised to use his brand of common sense based socialism to solve all the country's problems. In addition, he promised to push socialism to its limits by making college education free for everyone.

b. The "politically incorrect fact" about Socialism is that it is a glorified common sense based Ponzi scheme and like everything based on common sense and especially Ponzi Schemes, it is doomed to fail eventually.

c. The problem with failures in the digital-atomic age is that they will occur explosively, without warning, at the speed of light, taking everyone by surprise, like the Wall Street Collapse, the failure of the toxic mortgages, the failure of General Motors, the Bernie Madoff scandal, the collapse of Obamacare computers, 9/11, Benghazi, the Orlando Massacre, and every disaster that has struck people from the beginning of time and we have not yet learned the lesson these disasters are trying to teach us! Socialism is fallible the same way.


d. As with everything else, if Sen. Sanders wants to take preemptive measures to address the inevitable failure of Socialism, he must piggyback it on Einstein's Philosophy for solving "problems that seem insoluble" and on the algorithms for the pursuit of perfection for preventing and addressing all kinds of problems and failures and he will be able to prove that socialism made perfect by piggybacking it on an algorithm for pursuit of perfection based on relativity, is no different from capitalism made perfect the same way. It will be better than the capitalism piggybacked on common sense that we have today, the capitalism Mr. Trump is promising, the capitalism associated with all its "problems that seem insoluble" that we are experiencing in America today that the Democrats are trying to solve ineffectively.

e. When anything is piggybacked on relativity, it will take over when whatever is piggybacked on it stops working and or fails and make it work again and prevent that failure if it is humanly possible to avoid it.

f. Relativity is like a booster rocket. It is like money in the bank, that causes an explosion of new progress by jump-starting and turbo-charging whatever is piggybacked on it that has failed. What we need in America is democratic capitalism piggybacked on relativity that will make it the most versatile method of governance the human mind can think of because capitalism promotes the pursuit of excellence, the secret of the success of everything. Socialism insures that everyone has what everyone needs as an entitlement. Entitlement is a common-sense-based solution to the problem that everyone has to have ones needs met, but that will become a problem that seems insoluble in an environment in which there are entitlements that stifle the pursuit of perfection needed to prevent problems that seem insoluble from developing and solve those that develop.

g. Einstein defined education as it was going to apply to the digital atomic age that his theory would eventually lead to, when he said; "Education is not the learning of facts, but the training of the mind to think." I would add, to think at the speed of light, and with the perfection required for it to be effective at that speed. If Sen. Sanders makes this definition, the definition of the education he will provide for free, he will be able to do it himself right now or whenever he feels like it, preferably before his Party Convention or while campaigning for the Democratic Party nominee, if he chooses to do so. He will be able to do it in the few minutes it takes to inform everyone how to solve problems that seem insoluble using ASET andACTINEMAS. He would then do the country the greatest favor anyone has done and could do because the lack of "education" of these simple facts, is responsible for the mess we are in today. This state of affairs has come to pass because "University Professors," the people whose responsibility it was and is to prevent it, have abrogated their responsibility and sequestrated themselves in the Ivory Towers of conventional learning, having defined education as memorization of monumental amounts of facts without ever training their minds or the minds of our children to engage in the coordinated thinking and freelance thinking needed to survive in our digital-atomic age. They are the hallmarks and the secrets of the success of Einstein's Philosophy and the surgeons' algorithm.

h. All it takes to educate a mind to think is to inform it about the algorithms the mind uses to think. Once that seed is implanted in a mind, it will grow and take care of itself. All one has to do to insure that the world will always go in the most desirable direction is to "implode Einstein's I-Bomb" in the world and inform everyone about the algorithms about which President Obama failed to inform Mrs. Clinton and everyone else.

i. Einstein's A-Bomb enabled President Truman to end World War II (admittedly in in the most undesirable way, but the undeniable fact is, he ended it). Einstein's I-Bomb will end World War III preemptively, before it happens, by replacing the use of common sense as our primary problem-solving tool that considers terrorism, random acts of violence and total war as solutions for "problems that seem insoluble" and replacing it with relativity according to which enemies are the allies need for solving "problems that seem insoluble" any other way! In a world that thinks this way, the moment one finds an enemy, ones efforts will be towards making that enemy an ally, not to destroy him/her. When the concept of terrorism, killing and war are methods of solving "problems that seem insoluble" that was probably true thousands of years ago, is replaced in the minds of people, terrorism, war and other destructive methods of solving problems will disappear

j. If Sen Sanders somehow becomes a candidate again because Mrs. Clinton self-destructs before nomination/election day, and goes on to get elected and succeeds in delivering on his promises, his success piggybacked on Obamacare in addition to all the other so-called successes of the Obama Presidency, will create an explosive situation from which even God will not be able to save us!



i. Sen. Ted Cruz: Sen. Cruz: Sen. Cruz's campaign leaves us with the following thoughts;

a. Sen. Cruz was the only Candidate not promising to use common sense to solve the country's problems. However, his promise implied the use of common sense because it was to solve the country's problems using the Republican Party Philosophy, the Constitution and his faith in his religion, the three derivatives of common sense and conventional wisdom that have gotten us into the trouble we are in today because all of them stopped working the day Einstein discovered his theory of relativity and exposed the unreliability of common sense and conventional wisdom.

b. Therefore, it is obvious that Sen. Cruz would not have been able to deliver on any of his promises, if he were to become the front runner unless he made himself and his followers functional again by piggybacking his and their philosophies on relativity by taking the steps that were recommended for all the Candidates.

c. Therefore, if he wants to be a contender at the Convention if Mr. Trump self-destructs for any reason, or make the contribution to our welfare he is most qualified to make, one he could make anytime he chooses, he must act upon his reputation as an expert on the Constitution and Constitutional Law.

Sen. Cruz is the most eligible person in Congress to recognize, appreciate and act upon the fact that the changes that have occurred in the world consequent to the discovery of relativity, subsequent to the writing of the Constitution have change the world and rendered the Constitution non-functional in our digital-atomic age. He is the one most qualified to act upon this need by the orchestration of the amendment required to address these changes, adapt the Constitution, bring it up to speed (that of light), and make it functional again in our digital atomic age.

He must initiate this process as soon as he becomes aware of it unless he has a better alternative finding which is a "problem that seems insoluble." If he uses any of the algorithms that work under these circumstances to answer this question, he will arrive at the conclusion presented here.


d. In addition, he must acknowledge the fact that, based on what has been said so far, that it is not Obamacare or any of all the other individual accomplishments of President Obama that he promised to rescind if elected, that he should campaign to rescind, but It is the President's "BRAIN 2025 Initiative."

e. Therefore, he must initiate the process of rescinding BRAIN 2025 by demanding that President Obama and the leaders of his Dream Team respond to the allegations made in "Obamagate, The Evidence" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100. If it is established that President Obama did everything he did using common sense after it had stopped working, after being warned that it has been failing for the last hundred years and had stopped working in our "digital-atomic age," it nullifies everything he has accomplished ... or not accomplished. It would at least, make it mandatory that all his "accomplishments" be review by a Congress that he has made functional in our digital-atomic age by making the required Amendment.


v. DR. BEN CARSON; The answer to the question; "Why did Dr. Carson's run for the Presidency get sucked into a black hole in our digital-atomic age?" based onACTINEMAS, the algorithm that determines what happens in this age, one must take the following considerations into account determined by Einstein's Philosophy and/or the Surgeons' algorithm for the pursuit of perfection;

a. Dr. Ben Carson set out to save his country, the world and the future of his grandchildren by using his knowledge, experience and his problem-solving skills as a surgeon who has lived his life solving "seemingly insoluble problems" in surgery, to solve similar problems plaguing the country, the world and our civilization.

b. He ended up doing just the opposite. He did the greatest disservice a surgeon could possibly have done to his country, its people, its children, his profession and the algorithm that enabled him to do everything he has done and made him what he is, one of the most accomplished Neurosurgeons of his time. He allowed the first "problem that seemed insoluble" he encountered in everyday life the form of Mr. Trump, to blow him away and discredit the only algorithm in existence that could have eliminated Mr. Trump and enabled Dr. Carson to take the lead.

We shall answer this question using the algorithm he should have used but did not use, beginning with the question ... "WHY DID DR CARSON FAIL?"

c. AS ALREADY MENTIONED IN (A.6.) DR. CARSON DID NOT FAIL BECAUSE OF ANY DEFICIENCY OF THE SURGEONS' ALGORITHM. HE FAILED BECAUSE HE DID NOT USE A SINGLE ONE OF ITS STEPS. INSTEAD, HE REVERTED TO USING COMMON SENSE AND SAID AND DID THE OPPOSITE OF EVERYTHING HIS SURGEONS' ALGORITHM REQUIRED HIM TO SAY AND DO! And that raises the next question: "What did the surgeons' algorithm require Dr. Carson to do?

d. The answer to the question just asked is that Dr. Carson should have eliminated the challenge Mr. Trump posed, as effectively as if he was a menace, a "problem that seemed insoluble" in the way of his rendering vital care to a critically ill patient who was dying. He would have eliminated any such menace in the OR at a moment's notice, the moment he encountered it. if that menace was Mr. Trump, Dr. Carson would not have allowed his "thunder without substance" to stop him any longer than needed to take three politically incorrect statements of his own, required to execute the ABC's for making such statements professionally the way they ought to be made. He would not have allowed Mr. Trump's tirade to consume him by being meek and ineffective as it would have cost his patient his/her life. The fact is that "politically incorrect statements" must be delivered with the right amount of thunder, the thunder of righteous indignation, if not anything else, and "at the speed of light." This is the speed at which things will blow up if the surgeon does not act just as fast if not faster. "Orchestrating a temper tantrum" is something every surgeon, no matter how meek, has to develop as a part of his/her armamentarium if s/he is to be effective and prevail every time s/he is dealing with a "problem that seems insoluble" that is humanly possible to solve, in surgery. Dr. Carson should have accomplished this by adhering to the ABC's of the algorithm for making politically incorrect statements, that is essentially ASET or the first three steps of ACTINEMASas described for Mr. Trump in (Q.10; A.10.ii.c.).

Dr. Carson should have given Mr. Trump and America a crash course on how to make "politically incorrect statements" while solving "problems that seem insoluble" at the first opportunity he got, and that was after Mr. Trump had made three politically inappropriate statements inappropriately. Dr. Carson was waiting patiently at that time for someone to ask him a question. He should have taken the floor the way Mr. Trump did every opportunity he had, and not allowed anything to deter him from what he had to do! And that raises the next question; "Why was Dr. Carson unable to use the algorithm he used to do everything in surgery, to eliminate Mr. Trump?"

Q.11: HOW DOES SEC. CLINTON'S STATEMENT INCULPATE PRESIDENT OBAMA SEN. MARCO RUBIO, CONG. ALAN GREYSON, SPEAKER BOEHNER, SEN. BARBARA BOXER AND CONG. MICHAEL CONWAY IN THE ORLANDO MASSACRE?

A.11: Sec. Clinton's statement inculpated President Obama in the Orlando Massacre because the algorithms he concealed from everyone would, had he revealed them as requested, have given every officer of the law from the Police, the FBI, the CIA to the TSA Agent, social workers, and health care providers, the algorithms used by Einstein, surgeons and all professional people successfully for the last hundred years, to "acquire and process the most relevant information "at the speed of light" and make the best of decisions possible under the circumstances to take preemptive actions to prevent disasters and debacles occurring at the speed of light, the speed at which information travels and disasters occur in our digital-atomic age. They would have acquired this ability by learning to think faster than light the only way this can be done, by predicting the immediate future by engaging in coordinated thinking (thinking and finding and joining dots and extrapolation, the way Einstein made the predictions of relativity with uncanny accuracy, surgeons make life and death predictions and decisions in emergencies, and professional people make all decisions. This is the speed and the accuracy which we must all learn to think and act if we are to prevent disasters caused by explosive events occurring at the speed of light in our digital-atomic age, as described in "Letter No. 6 (A.6.f).

Had President Obama made this information public knowledge, family, friends, associates, care givers and all people who come in contact with people contemplating violent acts would have the intellectual tools they need to acquire and process information about them and take the proper preemptive action required. Simply telling people "if you see something, say something" is not enough. People have to be made aware of how to obtain ALL the information, not just what they see. They need to listen to, and feel everything they see, hear and feel, and know how to process this information, and make the best decisions possible, and unless they have an algorithm too do all these things, they will miss what is important and could react explosively to what is irrelevant the way everybody is doing everything now. If people are aware of these algorithms, they will take the best of actions possible all the time, not just while reporting suspicious activity, and be able to do anything and everything they must do to the best of their abilities. They will contact the right people, like the FBI/homeland Security, in a timely manner, and enable them to do the things required to prevent/abort "problems that seem insoluble" long before they occur. In addition, the FBI would have the tools they need to prevent them from investigating such individuals only to let them go free to commit horrendous acts later, the way it has happened in every single instance of random acts of violence. They would not release such people who need help without rendering them the help they need to overcome the circumstances (bullying, or other "problems that seem insoluble" that are frustrating them) and the emotions that are driving them to commit random acts violence.

This consideration inculpates President Obama in every random act of violence and terrorism committed in this country and abroad from the time he received the first of "The Letters" giving him the required information that could have prevented such acts until today, including the latest massacre at Orlando, and Dallas and all the ones that are going to happen in the future until someone in a leadership role, reverses this situation as recommended here.

In addition, The Massacre at Orlando also inculpated Sen. Marco Rubio and Cong. Alan Greyson, along with Ex-Speaker John Boehner, Sen. Barbara Boxer and Cong. Michael Conway, Chairpersons of the Senate and House Ethics Committees to whom "Obamagate, the Evidence" (posted at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100) was submitted for action as a "Letter of Complaint and a Bill of Particulars" nearly two years ago, in Nov. of 2015, electronically as required and by standard certified, trackable mail tracked until received. This petition/bill of particulars, accused President Obama of having plagiarized original information given to him in good faith, altered scientific information for personal gain, and authorizing an Initiative for public benefit based on an experiment that has no logistical chance of success at considerable public expense in dollars, lives and wellbeing, submitted with all the required evidence to support the claims.

Had any of these individuals acted upon this petition, by now, the FBI would have had the algorithms they need to obtain and process information and take preemptive decisions faster than light, the speed required to abort crime and random acts of violence like the Orlando and Dallas massacres where the FBI had investigated the perpetrators and released them on more than one occasion, making all of them culpable partially in the Orlando massacre.

and that raises the next question ...

Q.12: WHAT DID PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE LEADERS OF HIS "DREAM TEAM," MAINLY PROF. CORI BARGMANN DO WITH "THE INFORMATION" GIVEN TO HIM IN "THE LETTERS," THAT MAKES HIS "BRAIN 2025 INITIATIVE" A SCIENTIFIC HOAX?

A. 12: The complete list of all the things President Obama and his Dream Team did with the original concepts and statements of "The Letters" is described in detail in "Obamagate, The Evidence" a transcript of which is posted as a blog at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100.

Briefly, here is what President Obama did with "The Information" given to him.

He plagiarized all the fundamental statements and concepts given to him in "The Letters" (listed in (Addendum I.) in which they were conveyed to him, fragmented them, rearranged the fragments and modified them to conform to his personal, common-sense-based opinions, beliefs and Democratic Party policies, to "dress them up" and give them an aura of scientific authenticity.

He did not act on any of the original concepts as originally recommended.

In the process, he bastardized and castrated Einstein's philosophy of relativity, the plan-of-action that has the potential to solve all the "problems that seem insoluble" that are humanly possible to solve and made our digital-atomic age what it is, into a "catch 22" proposition that had no chance of ever working at anything.

Then he used this bastardized, castrated version of relativity to solve all the country's "problems that seem insoluble," that he chose to solve or was forced to address, and gave us Obamacare, "Cash for Clunkers," "The Sequester," ISIS, all the random acts of violence and the predictable and predicted Government shut-down that that occurred towards the end of his first term.

When all the predicted consequences of his actions materialized and proved the validity of the recommendations and the concepts on which they were based towards the end of his first term, President Obama denigrated all the original concepts (that he had ignored and not acted upon) and said they would not work, during his 2013 SOTU Address.

Two months later, he announced that he had appointed a "Dream Team" of "University Professors" to implement his "BRAIN 2025" Initiative that was aimed at performing a physical experiment based on his bastardized version of relativity, and to "catalyze a paradigm shift" in the way we think in this country as we solve problems. The paradigm shift President Obama sponsored, would have been a switch in the way we think in this country, to the way his brain functioned, as opposed to the paradigm shift he was requested to orchestrate that was based on the way the brains of Einstein, surgeons and all professional people, work. The difference between the two is the fact that the former never works whereas the latter works ninety-nine times out of hundred if executed properly!

Fortunately for everyone else, and unfortunately for President Obama, Einstein's theory of relativity predicts that the experiment on which he chose to pin his hopes on for his BRAIN Initiative, like everything else he had done, has no logistical chance of ever working, as they are all not in compliance with the rules of relativity that determine what works and what does not, in our digital-atomic age.

Since he and his Dream Team were informed about this problem and the consequences of their actions and chose deliberately not to refute these allegations and to persist in their publically funded endeavor in spite of the fact that all the predicted consequences of ignoring these facts have materialized, makes this "BRAIN 2025 Initiative" a scientific hoax.

In addition, time, resources and lives are being wasted by the Dream Team by trying to obtain information that already exists, using an experiment that has no logistical chance of working. The delay in the use of existing information to win all the wars we must win that can only be won using this information, makes the Dream Team as culpable as President Obama in Benghazi debacle and the Orlando massacre.

Copies of "Obamagate, The Evidence" were sent to President Obama and the leaders of his Dream Team with a request to respond, and refute, or accept its recommendations and reconcile. It was submitted as a Letter of Complaint, a Bill of particulars and a petition for action against President Obama and the leaders of his Dream team alleging plagiarism, alteration of a scientific principle for personal benefit and concealment of information required for public safety that has resulted in unmeasurable harm to all Americans. It was submitted to the Hon. John Boehner, then the Speaker of the house, the Leaders of "The Dream Team." the Chairpersons of the House (The Hon. Michael Conway) and (The Hon. Sen. Barbara Boxer) Senate Ethics Committees, and to Sen. Marco Rubio and Cong. Alan Greyson, Senator and Congressman respectively of my district. Almost two years have passed but none of them have bothered to respond or act upon this petition to date!

I did not take legal action as I do not have the resources and I cannot find or afford a lawyer who would take legal action against the President, and I did not want to leave the country and become a fugitive. I want to prove that the old saying that the pen is mightier than the sword because it is the fact, and because it is time to revisit some of the old sayings that are as true in the digital-atomic age as they were in the days gone by with the difference that we have to substitute more appropriate words like "the blog is mightier than the bomb!"

On Sept. 21, 2015 Prof. Cori Bargmann, the lead Co-Chairwoman of BRAIN 2025, granted an interview to a lone N.Y. Times reporterfrom the privacy of her home, concerning the BRAIN 2025 Initiative. Her concluding statement was: "Scientists were like detectives following a set of clues. Some clues were red herrings. Discarding them was an important step to getting to the right idea."

The concluding statement of an interview is usually the message the grantor of the interview wants to publicize. That raises the question; "Why did Prof, Bargmann make this statement?" The only reason for it, since she did not give another one, has to be considered the fact that she had indeed, found a "red herring" in BRAIN 2025" that she had dropped. If that is the case, "we the people" have a right to know what that red herring was since President Obama has pinned our future, and that of our country and our children, and hundreds of millions of Dollars in public funds that could be used better elsewhere, on this Initiative.

If this interview was her tongue-in-cheek "public" response required of her by "Obamagate, the Evidence," that had drawn her attention to the fact that BRAIN 2025 is itself a "red herring" because it does not conform to or abide by the rules of relativity, making it non-functional in the digital-atomic age, this response is a grossly inadequate non-response. If it is not a response to that allegation, it does not matter because dropping a little "baby red herring" from a fatally flawed Initiative that is itself "a mother of red herrings" is an endeavor in futility.

And that brings us to the last question of this expose ...

Q.13. WHAT SHOULD EACH PERSON NAMED IN THIS EXPOSE AND EACH AMERICAN CITIZEN DO IN BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO THEINFORMATION PRESENTED HERE?

A. 11: Here is the list of things each of the people named in this expose should do in view of the things that have been said ...
MR. DONALD TRUMP: Mr. Trump has the right slogan "We must make America great again" just like Candidate Obama had with his "I am going to make a change in America" battle cry.

Mr. Trump must promise to make the change in America required to make America and all Americans functional at the peak efficiency required for survival in our digital atomic age by doing what was recommended in the first of "The Letters to the President" that has been updated and expressed hopefully, more clearly here.

All the predictions made in that letter, in the video clip "Einstein's I-Bomb" and its follow up "Letter to the President No. 6" have come true and proved the veracity of these recommendations.
Towards this end, he must promise to do the things enumerated for him in this expose unless he can come up with something better
that meets the set criteria.

1. Dr. Ben Carson: If the allegation made against him that he is a copycat is true, he must admit it and set the ball rolling in the direction President Obama and everyone else must follow. He must make transparency provided by honesty the standard for all professional people including professional politicians to abide by, recognize it and make it the standard to strive for. He has a chance to be the first to do this and set the trend for the future.

If he is not a real copycat but an accidental one, it really does not matter. I apologizes to him for having used the accidental similarities revealed for (thrashing him for) accomplishing the goals I am sure we share and thank him in anticipation for the support I know he will give. If he refuses, I really do not care! I am sorry. If he proves me wrong, I shall merrily go into retirement as long as he agrees to take over.

2. Secretary Clinton, Sen Bernie Sanders and the Democratic Party must piggyback their philosophies on relativity and make themselves and their philosophies, personal and Party, functional in our digital-atomic age before doing anything else and make everyone and everything they can make functional, function again in our digital-atomic age.

3. Gov. Kasich and the Governors who ran and are out of the race, must piggyback their philosophies and the philosophies of their State Constitutions on relativity and initiate the process of making Amendments required to adapt them and make them functional in the digital atomic age.

4. The Republican Party: Mr. Trump has emerged as the winner of the Primaries. The Republican Party must accept him as their nominee because it is the will of "We the People." It must adopt, adhere to and abide by the dictates of relativity, piggyback the Republican Party Philosophy on it and insist that Mr. Trump and all Republicans do the same with their own personal philosophies so that everyone is singing in harmony, even while singing different tunes, and make themselves viable in our Digital Atomic age as described in this expose.

The greatness of Democracy is its recognition of the fact that the collective intelligence of "we the people" is better than that of any individual or groups. Before its leadership makes any decisions including the determination to go against the will of the people, it must upgrade its common-sense based Philosophy for decision-making and make it compatible with, and therefore functional under, the conditions prevailing in our "digital-atomic age" by piggybacking it on "relativity" along the lines established here. Mr. Trump is the only one in the race who has adopted two of the most crucial steps common to all of the algorithms for solving Problems that seem insoluble. It would be the greatest tragedy in the history of this country and this civilization if the two Candidates most qualified to solve "problems that seem insoluble, Dr. Ben Carson first, and now Mr. Trump who has gone all the way to become the front-runner, are excluded for any reason other than the fact that they are not physically able to function!

5. Sen. Ted Cruz: Sen. Cruz must do what has been recommended for him and work at making the Constitution functional again unless he can come up with a better plan.

6. Sen. Rubio: Sen. Rubio must take action upon the petition on "Obamagate, The Evidence" that was submitted to his office electronically and show that he is capable of handling stunning information delivered to him at the speed of light and solve "problems that seem insoluble" and establish his credentials and his credibility to continue as a Senator, and possibly become the most eligible candidate to be Mr. Trump's running mate, assuming Mr. Trump will emerge as the Nominee or become the nominee if Mr. Trump self-destructs after everything that has been said here.

7. President Obama and the Leaders of his Dream Team: President Obama and the leaders of his Dream Team must respond to "Obamagate, The Evidence" and refute or accept its contents before they are forced to do so by circumstances beyond their control. This is President Obama's last chance to redeem himself. Once he leaves the White House, he will be at the mercy of history and Relativity predicts, it will not be kind to him, and no prediction relativity has made has proved wrong yet!

8. "We the people" must make ourselves familiar with "The Information" given to President Obama. Its message is that the time has come for all our leaders, professional, political, societal and religious, to recognize and acknowledge the fact that they are all professional people and start abiding by the algorithms for the pursuit of perfection those who are required to take oaths of office are bound by and start abiding by those standards voluntarily, whether or not their jobs require them to take oaths of office. "We the people" must realize that professional leaders cannot be professional unless all the citizens are professional too and create the required environment. Therefore, every citizen must become a professional citizen and voluntarily agree to abide by the same professional algorithms in everything we do. Then, we will all be singing in perfect harmony, the condition we must meet to survive in our digital atomic age world that functions on the same notes.


And that ends this expose. The following addenda are appended;

Addendum I: The List of "The Letters to The President;

Addendum IIA: "The Information given to President Obama in Chronological order;

Addendum IIB. List of concepts expressed in their simplest terms in order of relevance.

ADDENDUM I.

1. LIST OF "LETTERS TO THE PRESIDENT" AND WHAT PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE LEADERS OF HIS DREAM TEAM DID WITH THE INFORMATION THEY CONTAINED

Here is the list of the "Letters to the President" in which all the information referred to in this expose was given to President Obama, along with a brief description of the information they contained and what President Obama and later, the leaders of his "Dream Team" did with it. "The Dream Team" is a group of "University Professors" he appointed and authorized to implement his BRAIN 2025 Initiative." The aim of this "Initiative" was; "mapping the brain of a worm as it functions ... to determine how the human brain works as it thinks (the algorithm it uses to think) and catalyze a paradigm shift in the way we think in this country ... to turn her around ... by enabling people to become more entrepreneurial and productive over the next five to ten years ... at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars a year ... in response to the presentation of ACTINMAS and ASET to him for free, ... the algorithms Einstein, surgeons, and all professional people employ to use their brains as living computers, monitors and GPS devices that can do things the most sophisticated of mechanical, physical, electronic computers can ever do!

With that thought, here is that list of "Letters to the President" and the URL's where they are archived and may be viewed.
These "Letters to the President" were eight in number and were mailed by registered/certified mail, return receipt requested (making them legal documents and the poor man's legal notifications/subpoenas) or other trackable forms of mail, and were tracked until delivered and received.

a. THE FIRST "LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT" This "Letter" was titled "Open Letter to President Bush, The Candidates and all Americans on How to Win the War on Terror by eliminating fallibility from Common Sense using ... Einstein's Philosophy etc., ... " It contained the information referred to in its title. It was dated 09/15/2008 and a transcript of it can viewed at http://www/successateverything.com/letter.php.

This "Letter" was addressed to President Bush who was then in his "lame duck" session and to President Obama and to Sen. McCain who were then "Candidates." It was published in its entirety as a paid advertisement in the Niagara Gazette on 9/21/2008 and an ad was inserted in the Washington Post on 10/22/2008 (text at http://www.successateverything.com/washingtonpost.php) inviting President Bush, The Candidates and everyone, to visit http://www.successateverything.com/letter.php and read the transcript of the original. Copies of these public notices were also mailed to all three recipients.

What President Obama and later, the leaders of his "Dream Team" did with this "Letter" and "The Information" it contained is documented in "Obamagate, the Evidence" at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100. A summary of what President Obama and later, his Dream Team did with this information is given in Section (A.10.).

b. THE SECOND "LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT:
This was a notification of the publications of the advertisements in the Niagara Gazette and the Washington Post and was accompanied by photo copies and clippings of the ads. A transcript of the Washington Post ad is posted at http://www.successateverything.com/washingtonpost.php

c. THE THIRD "LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT:
This "Letter was titled "Open Letter to President Obama," dated September 26, 2009. It was mailed to him immediately thereafter and repeated the information contained in the first letter adapted to apply specifically to President Obama. Its transcript is posted at http://www.successateverything.com/lettertoobana.php. It was written because President Obama had been in office for almost a year and had done nothing about delivering on his promise to "make the change in America" that someone needed to make, and seemed to have no intentions of doing so.

d. THE FOURTH "LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT."
The fourth "Letter" was an "Open Letter to America" that was mailed to him and posted at http://www.successateverything.com/lettertoobama2.php. It described the information given to President Obama modified to make it applicable to all Americans. This was written to facilitate sharing this information with "every man woman and child living in America and this world" because he was going to need the collaboration of everyone to be able to do what he had to do and he was not going to get it unless he shared with everyone "The Information" everyone needed to know to give him their support. This Information is summarized in (Addendum II.).

e. THE FIFTH "LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT" TITLED "EINSTEIN'S I-BOMB"
This "Letter" was mailed to President Obama on October 27, 2007, immediately after posting a video clip of the same title on YouTube that can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvb69nSpGL4. It and its transcript can also be viewed at http://successateverything.com/einstein.php.

This "Letter" summarized the information given to President Obama in the first four letters and warned him again that the consequences of not acting upon this information and associated recommendations would be "The Uncontrolled Explosion of Einstein's Intellectual Bomb in America" that would result in an explosive failure and destruction of everything we cherish as a result of our inability to think as we try to solve the overwhelming problems that will ensue.

ALL BUT ONE OF THE PREDICTIONS MADE IN THIS VIDEO CLIP AND "LETTER" HAVE SINCE COME TRUE PROVING THE VERACITY OF THE PREDICTIONS AND THAT OF THE PRINCIPLES UPON WHICH THEY WERE BASED.

f. THE SIXTH "LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT"

The sixth letter was titled "Undetected Breaches in White House Security, a notification from The I-Bomber." It was dated January 10, 2010 and its transcript is posted at http://www.successateverything.com/security.php. It was written and mailed after the "Underwear Bomber" incident on Christmas day 2009. It was my response to President Obama's statement following this incident that this particular terrorist was able to board the plane at Amsterdam because airport security had "failed to 'join the dots.'"

This "letter" was written because, this statement was the second one to make me suspect that President Obama was plagiarizing original ideas from my "Letters to the President," modifying them, making them non-functional, and using them as empty rhetoric in his speeches.

The first statement to arouse my suspicion was his election-winning, Nobel-Prize-winning battle cry of "I am going to make a change in America" if elected. This slogan made me suspect he was plagiarizing material from my "Letters" because it was the first thing I had requested him to do upon assuming office, a request that was made when he was still a Candidate, in my first "Letter."

This second statement raised by suspicion another notch, because, in all "The Letters" I had advised him that the only way he would ever succeed at winning the war on terrorism was by insuring that "every man, woman and child living on this planet, knew how to solve 'problems that seem insoluble' by 'finding and joining the dots'" one had to find and join to engage in the process of "coordinated thinking," the way Einstein thought while discovering relativity and surgeons think as they solve the "problems that seem insoluble" that they have to solve to diagnose and treat their patients.

This "Letter" had two messages; (a) The first one was that it was his failure to act upon the above recommendations that was the fundamental reason why the security personnel at Amsterdam airport was not aware of how to "join the dots" in this incident, making him primarily responsible for it; and (b) The second was the fact that vital information requiring action by him, communicated to him at the White House, by "registered mail, return receipt requested," the "poor man's subpoena," was not receiving the attention it deserved for reasons that were not obvious, as evidenced by the fact that he had not acknowledged receipt or responded to the "Letters" that communicated them to him, and this problem required to be addressed."

He was requested for the sixth time, to act upon this information and disseminate it post haste on receipt of this repeat reminder/ notification, instead of pontificating about it.

I did not want to accuse the President of plagiarism at that time because this was his second act. I wanted to wait until he confirmed my suspicion beyond doubt with a third act. This happened during his 2013 SOTU Address. It was followed by the cascade of the fourth to the twenty-fifth acts that were overt, blatant acts of plagiarism, by him and the leaders of his Dream Team. These statements were made during the announcement of his "BRAIN 2025 Initiative" over the next couple of months. Then, I filed my "complaint, bill of particulars and cease and desist request" in the form of "Obamagate, the Evidence" a transcript of which is posted at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100.

I shall briefly list the steps for engaging in "coordinated thinking" that President Obama was informed about again in this "Letter" that he concealed again, because he could not have acted upon this recommendation without revealing his plagiarism. This information is important for this expose to make sense. It is also what the present Candidates must make themselves and their supporters and followers aware of, if they want to succeed at delivering on any of the promises they are making.

"Coordinated thinking" was described for President Obama once more in this "Letter" as consisting of taking the following steps;
... "Asking and answering the set of fundamental questions, common to, and required by, all algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble," Einstein's Philosophy, the Surgeons' Algorithm, ACTINEMAS ("What isACTINEMAS?" posted at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/27) and/or ASET ("What is ASET" posted at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/28), followed by ...
... plotting those answers as dots on a three dimensional frame of reference made up of XYZ coordinates to obtain a 3-D graph; followed by ...
... "joining those dots," and
... extending that line "backwards into the past" to "understand" the problem, why it occurred and what could be done about it ba ...ed on ones knowledge and past experience, and ...
... extrapolating it "forwards into the future" to predict the immediate future, the one to three event/s most likely to occur next, followed by ...
... Unification of all the information (answers) obtained so far using shared commonalities, into "concepts" that enable (a) comprehension of the problem and (b) the making of "plans-of-action" for dealing with it. The "shared commonalities" are the laws common sense, (Newton's laws of motion) for dealing with "problems that are soluble" using common sense, and "the rules of relativity," the opposite of common sense, for dealing with "problems that seem insoluble," or problems that occur under circumstances where the rules of relativity apply.
... Once the "problem that seems insoluble," has been solved, flip-flopping between common sense and the opposite of it repeatedly and continuously in ones minds simply by adhering to one of the algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble," every time one does anything, may be required to prevent the old problem from recurring and new ones from developing.

All "The Letters" had advised President Obama that he should learn how to use these algorithms to find and "join the dots" he had to find and join to solve the "problems that seemed insoluble" he had to solve, and to teach all Americans to do the same, if he wanted to win the war on terrorism, prevent random acts of violence, and solve any and all of the "problems that seem insoluble" that he had to solve, and keep them solved

I signed the letter calling myself "The I-Bomber" for the following reasons; (a) because I was requesting President Obama to "implode Einstein's Intellectual Bomb or the I-Bomb" in America, the term I had coined to describe the process of rapidly disseminating "the Information" given to President Obama in "The Letters." This information when made available to everyone, will make everyone who is not intellectually compromised, want to implode "Einstein's I-bomb" in ones own mind and deliberately implode outdated non-functioning concepts based on common sense stored in ones memory and replace them with functional concepts incorporating the rules of relativity. This will convert the uncontrolled explosions caused by the failures of common sense into controlled implosions one could harness and steer towards solving the "problems that seem" insoluble any other way.

"The I-Bomb" is a "constructive bomb." It exists in the minds of people aware of how to solve "problems that seem insoluble" using Einstein's theory of relativity. It prompts constructive solutions to "problems that seem insoluble," by deliberately imploding such problems into their components when they become "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense.

The I-Bomb unleashes the positive forces of unification and repair in the minds of people when the negative forces of destruction, unleashed by proliferation of "problems that seem insoluble" beyond critical mass prompts people to engage in explosively destructive actions like random acts of violence/terrorism and acts of war that lead to war itself.

I wrote the message on the front of the envelope containing this letter that it was from "THE I-BOMBER" in large red letters to insure that it would get the explosive attention it deserved and required. I was even concerned that I might be arrested for sending "a bomb letter" to the White House. At the same time, I was equally confident that nothing would happen because any reaction from the White House would have blown the whistle on the fact that The President had plagiarized the "The Letters" and ignored its scientific contents.

As expected, there was not even a squeak from the President, the White House or Homeland security! Therefore, I could not blow the whistle on the President then. In addition, this was only the second strike against him and he silenced it by not responding. I had to wait for a third, more credible one that came during his 2013 SOTU Address after which, I filed my "Obamagate" my complaint, but that too was ignored allowing the state of affairs to continue and lead to the Benghazi debacle that obviously would not have happened had President Obama acted upon the information and recommendations contained in this "Sixth Letter" and Sec. Clinton had this "Information."

g. THE SEVENTH LETTER:
The seventh "Letter" was written after Congressman Harry Reid said something at a press conference to the effect that "a lot of horse trading was going to take place before health care reform could occur" while the Obamacare Debates were raging in Congress. It was written to inform President Obama that neither I, a surgeon, nor any of my patients, wanted decisions about "problems that seemed insoluble" in our health care delivery, to be made using "horse trading methods" in our digital-atomic age, but rather by using scientific, mathematical and biological principles for solving such problems as enabled by, the algorithms used by Einstein, surgeons, physicians and all professional people, to solve "problems that could not be solved using common sense and conventional wisdom."
This "Letter was written because reforming health care delivery was a golden opportunity for President Obama, Congress and the country to learn how physicians solve "problems that seem insoluble and adapt, adopt and use those principles to reform health care delivery and make it the best it could be, and learn how to do the same with all the other "problems that seem insoluble." It was painful to watch the President deliberately squander this opportunity in spite of having been informed about its consequences repeatedly.
This "Letter" was titled "A Lesson to Be Learned from the Health Care Fiasco." It was published in The Niagara Gazette on Dec. 10 2009. A clipping of it was mailed to President Obama soon thereafter. A transcript of it is posted as a blog at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/43/.

h. THE EIGHTH LETTER:
This "Letter" was an invitation to President Obama to visit Niagara Falls and see for himself how a once thriving city and its once thriving hospital were tottering on the brink of disaster and bankruptcy caused by "problems that seem insoluble" resulting from the failures of common sense based plans-of-action to revive them.
It was an invitation for President Obama to observe how a surgeon solves "problems that seem insoluble" in medical practice using the Surgeons' Algorithm, the adaptation of Einstein's Philosophy for solving such problems in Medical practice and in everyday life, so that he may understand how to adapt and use it to solve the country's "problems that seem insoluble" too.
This "Letter" was given the title "Obama Can Learn a Lot from the Falls" by the Editor of the Niagara Gazette in which it was published as an Op-Ed on April 3, 2010. Its transcript is posted at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/44/ and a copy of it was mailed to President Obama.

I did not expect President Obama to respond to this "Letter" directly but I suspected his guilty conscience would force him to respond in some way indirectly, to justify himself, and he did! A few weeks later, on May 13, 2010, he paid a visit to a plant in Buffalo N.Y., twenty miles south of Niagara Falls, a plant that was singled out for this honor as it was a lone plant that was thriving based on common sense in the midst of an ocean of shuttered businesses common sense could not sustain. It was a plant that was flying on its own power, not because of anything he had done, but from the fact that there was a demand for its services, but that did not deter the President from using it to muster some credit for himself because it was the only thing thriving at that time based on common sense in the area and he wanted to prove that common sense was working! He did not make a trip to Niagara Falls that every visitor to the area makes, in spite of the invitation that awaited him! I am not accusing him of anything in this regard. I shall leave the reader to draw his/her own conclusion.

However, three years later, Prof. Cori Bargmann, Co-Chairwoman of BRAIN 2025, used the scenario described in this "Letter" to kill two birds with one stone and revealed that she was aware of the contents of this "Letter to the President," and felt the gnawing need to rebut its contents to justify herself, her actions and those of her patron, the President.

First, she wanted to justify President Obama's failure to accept the invitation from a surgeon to watch him use his brain as a computer, while solving "problems that seem insoluble" any other way, by mocking it and comparing it to following the hospital receptionist around to find out how a hospital works! Second, she wanted to justify the confidence her patron the President had placed in her ability to experimentally "catalyze" passively for him "the paradigm shift" "The Letters" had requested him to orchestrate actively, by mapping the brain of a worm, instead of the original paradigm shift he was requested to orchestrate that was based on algorithms used by the brains of Einstein, surgeons, and professional people, to solve the most challenging of problems, "problems that seem insoluble any other way" that were already in existence and working for over a hundred years.

I have responded to these remarks from Prof. Bargmann in "Obamagate, The Evidence" in Section 7.5, and I shall not repeat them here. All I shall say is that these comparisons are comparisons of apples to oranges. The first comment is an insult every hospital receptionist and worker whose service is as important for the functioning of a hospital as my service as a surgeon because I cannot function if a single one of the others did not do their jobs well. Her comments were an insult Einstein, every surgeon, every professional person and every American because they insinuate that a paradigm shift in the way we think based on the map of the brain of a worm as it works, can improve the way Americans think rather than a paradigm shift based on the algorithm used by thinkers like Einstein, surgeons and professional people as recommended in "The Letters!

Prof. Bargmann has not responded yet.

Since President Obama did not respond to any of these letters, and seemed to be doing the opposite of everything recommended, I stopped corresponding with him. I decided to wait until the fate of all plagiarists catches up with him, something Sec. Clinton did with her fateful statement.

ADDENDUM II.

"THE INFORMATION" GIVEN TO PRESIDENT OBAMA IN "THE LETTERS TO THE PRESIDENT" WITH THE REQUEST THAT HE CONVEY IT TO EVERY MAN, WOMAN AND CHILD LIVING ON THIS PLANET BECAUSE FAMILIARITY WITH THESE FACTS OF LIFE HAS BECOME ESSENTIAL FOR SURVIVAL IN OUR DIGITAL-ATOMIC AGE.

"The Information" President Obama was given consisted of nine sets of facts that are needed as much to understand this expose, as they are for survival in the digital-atomic age.

ADDENDUM IIA: "THE INFORMATION" IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER; I shall first present this information in the sequence in which they were discovered then I shall present them as practical information anyone can use anywhere to do anything that cannot be done any other way because they will make the most sense when presented this way.

i. A HUNDRED YEARS AGO. EINSTEIN DISCOVERED THE FOLLOWING FIVE FACTS OF LIFE;

a. THE FACT THAT COMMON SENSE (INFORMATION OBTAINED USING OUR SENSES OF SIGHT, HEARING, AND TOUCH), THE FUNDAMENTAL PHILOSOPHY WE USE TO DO EVERYTHING WE DO, (UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING, ACCOUNT FOR EVERYTHING, ANSWER ALL QUESTIONS, AND SOLVE ALL PROBLEMS), IS FALLIBLE, AND WILL FAIL EVENTUALLY EVERY TIME WE USE IT;

b. WHEN COMMON SENSE FAILS, THE PROBLEMS WE WERE TRING TO SOLVE WILL BECOME "PROBLEMS THAT SEEMS INSOLUBLE," PROBLEMS ONE WILL NOT BE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND OR SOLVE USING COMMON SENSE, NO MATTER HOW HARD OR HOW LONG ONE MIGHT TRY;

c. "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" CAN BE MADE COMPREHENSIBLE AND SOLUBLE BY USING "THE RULES OF RELATIVITY" THAT REQUIRES ONE TO THINK THOUGHTS THAT ARE THE OPPOSITE OF THOUGHTS BASED ON COMMON SENSE AND DO THINGS THAT ARE THE OPPOSITE OF EVERYTHING DICTATED BY COMMON SENSE WHEN COMMON SENSE STOPS WORKING. THIS IS BASED ON EINSTEIN'S DISCOVERY OF THE FACT THAT COMMON SENSE FAILS BECAUSE THERE ARE FACTORS AND FORCES AT WORK (EG. INERTIAL MOTION AND RELATIVITY) THAT ARE IMPERCEPTIBLE TO THE SENSES AND THAT THE ATTRIBUTES OF THESE FACTORS AND FORCES ARE THE OPPOSITE OF THE ATTRIBUTES OF FACTORS AND FORCES THAT ARE PERCEPTIBLE).

d. Therefore, all the problems we have to solve can be divided into two categories, those that can be understood and solved using common sense and those that "defy solution" or "seem insoluble" using common sense, those that cannot be understood or solved using common sense but can be solved by doing things that are the opposite of things dictated by common sense.

e. Continued use of common sense to solve "problems that seem insoluble" will result in an explosive destruction of everything involved, a phenomenon I have named "the Explosion of Einstein's Intellectual Bomb or I-Bomb.

Einstein discovered these facts when physicists lost their ability to understand and explain three new developments in physics and they had to come up with a different explanation (theory) for each new development. Einstein felt this was unacceptable and that it ought to be possible to account for all new developments using a single fact or theory.

f. Therefore, Einstein asked and answered a set of three questions repeatedly that enabled him to understand, account for and explain all three discoveries. The answers to his questions were the components of his theory of relativity. Thus, he discovered his theory of special relativity. In the process de also determined what the three fundamental questions are that one must ask and answer if one wants to understand, account for, explain or discover anything.

g. Einstein's theory established the cause for "problems that seem insoluble" to be the fact that the velocity (speed) of light does not obey the laws of common sense, (Newton's Laws of motion) that everything else in nature obeys, but that it abides by the "rules of relativity" that are essentially the opposite of everything dictated by common sense, conventional wisdom and Newton's laws of motion.

h. Then, Einstein continued to ask and answer his three questions repeatedly vis-a-vis various problems in physics and unifying his answers using relativity as the shared commonality and unification factor and he was able to discover, explain, account for and solve "problems that seem insoluble" that existed in all other areas of theoretical physics that physicists did not even know existed.

i. In addition, he was able to predict discoveries yet to be made that sounded bizarre when he made them but proved to be true when the technology required to confirm them became available. Confirmation of his predictions proved the validity of Einstein's theory of relativity beyond a doubt and to date, NO PREDICTION BASED ON THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY HAS PROVED WRONG YET!

j. Finally, Einstein realized that there were "problems that seem insoluble" in all areas of human interest outside the realm of theoretical physics, such as Newtonian physics, everyday life, governance, and religion, and wanted to extend the use of his theory to all these areas as a "unified field theory" but neither he, nor anyone who followed was able to do and the effort continues.


Since he was unable to extend relativity to Newtonian Physics and everyday life, Einstein reconciled and said that the rules of relativity apply only to velocities approaching the speed of light but for all other speeds, like those we deal with in everyday life, common sense and Newton's Laws of motion still hold true because the effects of relativity are too small to be noticeable at such speeds.

ii. IN THE NEXT FIFTY TO SEVENTY-FIVE YEARS, the following things happened;
a. Technology enabled by the discovery of relativity developed explosively. Professional people like engineers, navigators, and surgeons used this technology and extended the effects of relativity to all areas of human interest.

b. Three of these developments, the advents of Information technology (IT) that enabled information to be transmitted at the speed of light, Computer Science (CS) that enabled processing of large volumes of information at the speed of light, and weapons and instruments of mass destruction (WOMD) like the nuclear bomb, incendiary devices and assault rifles that enabled mass destruction to occur explosively at the speed of light in everyday life, made the effects of relativity perceptible in everyday life.

c. The consequences of these three developments that move and/or occur at the speed of light in everyday life, do not obey the laws of common sense, or Newton's laws of motion but abide by the rules of relativity. Surprisingly, no one noticed this fact or made the required adjustments and everyone continued to use common sense and conventional wisdom to deal with phenomena that did not abide by the laws of common sense! This led to the development of "problems that seem insoluble" in all areas of human interest and their numbers, varieties and magnitudes proliferated in geometric proportions resulting in the mess we are in today with no end in sight.

d. However, the simultaneous development of computer science and the universal availability of laptops and handhelds that could process large amounts of information at speeds approaching that of light, enabled people to deal with most of the problems just recognized and relieved people of the responsibility of having to deal with them personally.

e. Unfortunately, the fastest speed at which computers can work is the speed of light making it impossible for them to deal with problems occurring explosively at the same speed, making them useless for dealing with the explosive disasters of the digital-atomic age, leaving us with nothing but common sense that is already non-functional, and our own brains that were programmed to function at the speed of common sense to deal with them!

f. The problem with trying to solve "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense after computers have also failed, is that things have been pushed as far as they can be pushed and are now ready to explode and any attempt to do anything using common sense will simply trigger the explosion waiting to happen and physically destroy everything involved. The equivalent phenomenon occurring in the minds of people will also intellectually paralyze everyone and no one will know what to think or do. I have named this phenomenon "the explosion of Einstein's Intellectual Bomb or the I-Bomb" in peoples' minds and in the world outside where these problems accumulate, proliferate and "profligate."

g. It is a fact of life, a "no brainer," that we must be able to obtain information, think (process information) and act (respond to information) faster than the speed at which information travels and disasters happen, if we want to be effective at dealing with "problems that seem insoluble," and prevent disasters and undesirable outcomes before they happen, and/or promoting desirable consequences/outcomes, or to even survive, in our digital-atomic age. Therefore, we must acquire the ability to obtain information, think (process it) and act faster than the speed of light if we want to survive! This creates another logistical problem. Einstein's theory of relativity predicts that nothing can travel faster than light because the velocity of light is the highest attainable velocity and anything that travels faster than light will simply disappear.

h. Therefore, there is only way we can deal with the problem of "problems that seem insoluble" that occur at the speed of light, and that is by learning to think, and act faster than light! The questions Einstein asked and answered to discover relativity, enabled him to engage in coordinated thinking and predict what would happen in the immediate future essentially the way meteorologists forecast the weather enabled him to think faster than the speed at which light travels by predicting the immediate future Fortunately, this is not only possible, it was done by Einstein using his theory of relativity, and surgeons and all professional people have figured out algorithms that enable them to do this without invoking the theory of relativity. Einstein did it by engaging in "coordinated thinking" and predicting the immediate future, the way weather forecasters forecast the weather to understand and account for such problems. Since Einstein did not have to act upon any of these problems, he did not tell us about how they can be solved by taking preemptive action before undesirable things happen, to prevent disasters and promote desirable outcomes preemptively. Surgeons and professional people developed these methods insidiously over the next seventy plus years using Coordinated thinking, thinking, thinking by finding and joining dots as described for President Obama in the First "Letter to the President" and repeated in the sixth one as noted in (Addendum I).

i. Surgeons and professional people used algorithms that are essentially equations expressed in words, to do what Einstein did with mathematical equations and thus, they solved "problems that seemed insoluble" in everyday life.

j. Algorithms work by enabling professional people to engage in "the pursuit of perfection," defined as "insuring that one has done everything one could possibly do by acting as check lists of everything one could possibly do." The pursuit of perfection solves "problems that seem insoluble" by insuring that one does the opposite of everything common sense dictates in addition to everything common sense dictates, because the former actions are things one could possibly do, but one does not do because common sense (conventional wisdom, and common law, the law of the land, that is essentially based on common sense) forbids one from doing them! Thus, the pursuit of perfection addresses the "problem that seems insoluble about to develop, preemptively before they have a chance to develop as if one had used the theory of relativity.

Common sense, conventional wisdom and common law prohibit anyone from doing things that are contrary to the dictates of common sense because they cause implosions of "Einstein's I-Bomb" in the minds of people and make them non-functional. Since the mind is not a physical entity, it cannot explode. It can only implode and stop working!

Translation of thoughts contrary to the dictates of common sense into actions contrary to the dictates of common sense in the world outside the human mind will cause physical explosions of everything involved and will destroy everything unless it is done by professional people who know how to control the explosions that will occur and how to harness them to prevent undesirable outcomes while promoting desirable ones. This is why professional people are licensed to do things contrary to the dictates of common sense while solving "problems that seem insoluble" that cannot be solved any other way (using common sense).

All the problems that confront us now, as individuals, as a nation and as a civilization, problems our Congress, our President and all our world leaders, have been unable to solve individually or collectively, allowing them to proliferate and profligate are "problems that seem insoluble" and raise the question ... "is it possible to solve the "problems that seem insoluble" plaguing us today in every aspect of everyday life and democratic governance?" The answer is yes and the journey to find out how, started, at least for me, when ...

iii. IN THE SECOND HALF OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY, THE FACT THAT "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" IN EVERYDAY LIFE AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE CAN BE SOLVED BY ENGAGING IN "THE PURSUIT OF PERFECTION" WAS DISCOVERED AND DESCRIBED

This concept was described for the first time by a little known physician, philosopher, artist and perfectionist, my father Dr. T.K.N. Trivikram. Father was a physician, a philosopher, and a freelance thinker, who was pained by the religious rioting, massacres and religion-based wars following the partition of India and the preceding anti-Semitic holocaust in Europe, made an effort to find a commonality that could eliminate religious strife by unifying all religions into a common philosophy for solving "problems that seemed insoluble" in everyday life, instead of being the main source of such problems.

He studied the scriptures of all the major religions with the diligence of the perfectionist that he was. He recognized a common trend (commonality) in all the scriptures he studied. It was the fact that they all had one thing in common with one another and with the practice of medicine ... the fact that they all entailed the "algorithmic pursuit of perfection" while solving "problems that seemed insoluble" in everyday life, and medical practice respectively, with one difference. The medical algorithm was scientific and insured that "the pursuit of perfection" occurred physically and secured tangible goals, whereas, the religions used the same algorithms to formulate rituals to attain intangible, ethereal goals. Never-the-less, the goals religions accomplished for their followers and believers, were important in situations where physical solutions to "problems that seem insoluble" did not exist, or were not available or even possible. He realized that incorporation of the concept of "the pursuit of perfection" by the use of algorithms that insured that one had "done everything one could possibly do, every time one did anything" into the problem-solving algorithms of everyday life and democratic governance, could enable individuals and democracies to solve "problems that seem insoluble" in everyday life. He also realized that the unification of all scientific, religions and political groups using this algorithm as a shared commonality, into a single functioning unit could provide the platform for the ideal form of democratic governance. The resulting government would be one that solved "problems that seem insoluble" instead of being the greatest source of such problems like our Congress, our current Administration and our current religions have become. He wrote a book on the subject titled "The Happiness of Mankind, The Saathvic State (the perfect Government)," that earned him a Ph.D. from the University of Bombay. He also gifted me with his algorithm for the pursuit of perfection for solving all "problems that seemed insoluble," in my personal life in the form of the "Father's Advice" that I have described for President Bush, Candidate Obama, and in my e-book, "My journey to ASET." "Father's Advice" enabled me to succeed in life by enabling me to solve all the "problems that seemed insoluble," and there were many, that I had to solve, to become a successful vascular surgeon, and to do the things I have done, things that have culminated in this expose.

iv. In THE 2008 THE POTENTIAL FOR THE SURGONS' ALGORITHM UNIFIED WITH EINSTEIN'S PHILOSOPHY TO SOLVE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" IN EVERYDAY LIFE AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE WAS DESCRIBED FOR PRESIDENT BUSH AND CANDIDATE OBAMA IN THE FIRST OF "THE LETTERS TO THE PRESIDENT."

The concept that the Surgeons' Algorithm could be used to solve "problems that seem insoluble" in everyday life and Democratic governance, was described for President Bush and Candidate Obama by yours truly in the first of "The Letters to the President" archived at http://www.successateverything.com/letter.php/ASET. Briefly, this is how it happened ...

a. Having Practiced surgery for years in the United States, made me realize that American surgeons were making mistakes they should never be making, the way physicists had started making them before Einstein put an end to it.

b. Surgeons were making mistakes in spite of all the most advanced of technology, concepts, computerization and methods like the use of check lists, available to them, making the incidence of mistakes in surgery by surgeons, a true "problem that seems insoluble."

c. I recognized the need for someone to determine if Einstein's method of eliminating mistakes by physicists in physics while solving physical "problems that seemed insoluble" in the earliest days of the digital-atomic age, could be adapted for use to eliminate errors in judgment and other mistakes made by surgeons in the fully expressed days of the digital-atomic age, since both of them shared a commonality, that of being "problems that seems insoluble."

d. When the above thought crossed my mind, I remembered what Einstein had said about "learning the methods" physicists use ;;; "if you want to find out anything from the theoretical physicists about the methods they use, I advise you to stick closely to one principle: do not listen to their words, fix your attention on their deeds." So, I fixed my attention on all of Einstein's deeds as he eliminated mistakes physicists had made in theoretical physics and discovered relativity.

e. Einstein's advice made me make a list of all the things he said he had done. Then I expressed them in their simplest terms as an algorithm anyone could use anywhere. When I did this, I got a surprise! I realized that Einstein had discovered relativity using an algorithm identical to the algorithm I use as a surgeon, to diagnose and treat patients, the medical-surgical diagnostic-therapeutic protocol that my father had taught me and my teachers in medical school taught me again, but with two differences.

... The first difference between the surgeons' algorithm and Einstein's was that one step of Einstein's algorithm was missing from the surgeons' algorithm and easily accounted for why surgeons were still making avoidable mistakes!
... The second difference was that one of the steps of the surgeons' algorithm that surgeons always take, (a question they always ask and answer) omission of which would be tantamount to malpractice by definition, Einstein had failed to ask and answer on one occasion when he should have asked and answered it to complete the process he had started by the biological standards set in medical practice! Even though it was a step of the algorithm he had established, he did not take it the last time around, because he had not followed his own advice and made a list of the things he had done to succeed and referred to it for guidance! At this point, he stopped making progress, making it obvious that omission of this must be considered the reason why he stopped making progress. When I asked myself this question, I was amazed to have my mind prompt to me the answer to the question that solved the "problem that seemed insoluble" to me until then and I was able to realize why Einstein was unable to extend the use of relativity to Newtonian Physics and everyday life, even though I was not a physicist by training.

f. Einstein did not ask and answer this question for three reasons; (a) Because he could not think of it as he has admitted by his own confession; (b) He did not think of it because he did not follow his own advice and make a list of steps he had taken the first time around and repeated them the second time around; and (c) There was no need for him to think about it and there was nothing to prompt him to think about it because light was the only thing that travelled at the speed of light in everyday life and being itself imperceptible, it had no perceptible defects to prompt him to think along these lines.

Had he thought about the above, had he been biologically or surgically oriented, I have no doubt, he would have completed the process he had started and it would have enabled him to eliminate the effects of the fallibility of common sense from everyday life situations and made it possible for us to solve all our "problems that seem insoluble."

g. On recognizing the above facts, I unified the two algorithms, Einstein's Philosophy and the surgeons' algorithm, by piggybacking them on one another, and eliminating duplication, to obtain an algorithm of ten steps that I named ACTINEMAS (the answer to the question: "What isACTINEMAS," is posted at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/27.)

InACTINEMAS, common sense, conventional wisdom and relativity are piggybacked on one another, unified by the commonalities shared by everything in existence, the laws of physics and the rules of relativity (as the common denominators). InACTINEMAS, common sense, conventional wisdom and relativity follow one another in sequence and one takes over from the other as it fails, to give an algorithm that goes on successfully solving problems of both kinds, those that can be solved using common sense and those that "seem insoluble using common sense," but can be solved using the rules of relativity," successfully, rapidly repeatedly and perpetually.

h. At this point, I realized that ACTINEMASand Einstein's Philosophy have a shortcut for using them, an algorithm I named ASET. The Answer to the question as to what is ASET is given in my fist "Letter to the President and is summarized at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/28. Essentially, ASET solves all kinds of problems rapidly repeatedly and consistently by simply recognizing the two opposing sets of factors and forces working against one another to create all kinds of problems, unifying them and making them work together at all times, by flip-flopping between the two sets of commonalities shared by everything in existence ... the laws of common sense (Newton's Laws of Motion) shared by everything based on common sense, and the rules of relativity, the opposite of common sense, shared by everything in which the velocity of light plays a role.

The opposing sets of factors and forces unified in ASET are, common sense/conventional wisdom and relativity, one addressed by each one of three steps, unified by the shared commonalities recognized by the answer to the fourth question, all piggybacked on one another in sequence so that one method of solving problems takes over when the other one fails. After the rules of relativity addressed by the first question of ASET have solved the "problem that seems insoluble, and "lit the fuse" of Einstein's I Bomb, the answers to its second question will recognize everything based on common sense, convert the explosion of the I-Bomb into an implosion and solve the "problem that seems insoluble" that has been rendered soluble by the implosion of the I-Bomb. As this is going on, the commonalities shared by the answers to both sets of questions that are constantly being recognized alternately by one's mind that naturally flip-flops between the two rapidly at speeds approaching the "the speed of light." If this does not happen naturally, one could make it happen intentionally with minimum effort and the problem will be solved if it is humanly possible to solve it

i. When all the problems that need to be solved are solved, the mind goes back to flip-flopping between taking the steps of common sense and conventional wisdom their opposites while flip-flopping between the laws of common sense/conventional wisdom and the rules of relativity to create a background/environment in which all kinds of problems solve themselves and new problems of either kind are prevented from developing or are solved preemptively, or addressed using common sense executed with perfection as soon as they occur.

j. When I stumbled upon/discovered/formulated ACTINEMASand ASET, President G.W. Bush was in his "lame duck" session. President Obama and Sen. McCain were Candidates and the Presidential debates were going on. Listening to these debates and to President Bush complaining and blaming everyone else for his inability to have the bipartisan support he needed as the reason why he was unable to get anything done in Congress, I realized that all the problems the American President and Congress would ever have to solve are always going to be "problems that seem insoluble," problems that cannot be solved using common sense because all problems that are soluble using common sense would have been solved by others. I realized that we, our Congress and our President, our friends and our enemies, are all trying to solve "problems that seem insoluble" caused by the failures of common sense, using the common sense, the failures of which caused them in the first place! I realized that the only way we, our Congress and our President are going to solve any of these problems, is going to be by switching from using common sense and conventional wisdom for solving all problems, to using algorithms that incorporate the use of relativity, like ASET, the surgeons' algorithm or Einstein's algorithm. This discovery I had stumbled upon, made me write the first of "The Letters to the President," to President Bush and the Candidates" that conveyed "The Information" summarized here and "The Recommendations" given in (A.8.).

This information was conveyed to President Obama repeatedly in different forms in eight "Letters to the President" listed in (Addendum I). Their transcripts are posted at my website at http://www.successateverything.com and what President Obama did with it is described in "Obamagate, the Evidence posted at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100 and in (Q.12; A.12;).

v. THE FIVE ALGORITHMS FOR SOLVING "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE." There are therefore, five ways (algorithms) in existence for solving "problems that seem insoluble" in everyday life and democratic governance that were described for President Obama. They all have one thing in common, they all enable one to engage in the "pursuit of perfection" defined as "doing ones best" by "doing everything one could possibly do."
a. Einstein's method, that of using Einstein's Philosophy/Algorithm. Einstein solved the first "problem that seemed insoluble" in physics using his algorithm. He discovered relativity in the process and did all the other incredible things he did, but no one adapted his algorithm for use in everyday life until yours truly did it for President Bush and Candidate Obama. He did it by piggybacking it on the surgeons' algorithm and making both applicable in everyday life. Before this "unification by piggy backing," neither algorithm was amenable for use in everyday life because each had one step missing from it that was present in the other algorithm that made both unsuitable for use in everyday life. Unification of the two by piggybacking, provided the missing steps from both and at the same time, unified them into one algorithm that I named ACTINEMASthat could be used anywhere.

b. The Surgeons' Method of using the surgeons' algorithm that surgeons use to diagnose and treat their patients and solve "problems that seem insoluble" in medical practice. This algorithm lacks one of the steps of Einstein's algorithm that is required to make it viable for it to solve such problems in everyday life that yours truly provided by piggybacking it on Einstein's Algorithm (actually, the two algorithms were piggybacked on one another so that each one takes over from the other when it fails);

c. By engaging in the pursuit of perfection, that has been defined as "doing everything that is humanly possible to do" by the precedents set at trial litigations of medical malpractice, and by the conventions set by society, that works by insuring that one has done "everything dictated by common sense" and "everything dictated by the rules of relativity" that are the opposite of everything dictated by common sense, every time one does anything, rapidly and repeatedly. Incorporation of the concept of the "pursuit of perfection" in democratic governance was described by my father in his Ph.D. thesis that was later published as a book in the 1960's as the ideal form of governance and was the inspiration that led me to write "The Letters to The President" and to make this expose to address what President Obama did with that information.

d. By using ACTINEMAS, the algorithm for the pursuit of perfection obtained by piggybacking Einstein's Philosophy (Algorithm) and the Surgeons' Algorithm on one another so that each one takes over when the other one fails The answer to the question; "What is ATINEMAS is archived as a blog at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/27.

e. By using ASET the "Algorithm for Success at Every Thing," the shortcut for using ACTINEMAS. It consists of flip-flopping between relativity defined as "doing everything that is the opposite of everything dictated by common sense" and doing "everything dictated by common sense" rapidly, repeatedly and alternately so that the former implodes "problems that seem insoluble" and makes them soluble for a moment in time when the latter solves it and any other "problems that are soluble" that may be compounding the problem, using common sense thus dealing with all eventualities preemptively. The answer to the question "What is ASET is posted as a blog at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/28.

Of these methods, "the pursuit of perfection" is the most practical one that has been established as standard of practice expected of people required to take oaths "to do ones best" upon assuming office or starting a profession, by legal precedents set at tort litigations and by societal expectations established by convention.

vi. THE ROLE OF "UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS" IN SOLVING "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE."

It was, is and always will be the duty of "University Professors" to monitor the changes occurring in the world, keep people informed about them and what they must do regarding such events, and disseminate this information to everyone but they did not do this regarding relativity for the following four reasons;

a. Because these changes occurred insidiously and took a hundred years to "come of age" in everyday life and no one, including "University Professors" noticed them coming;

b. The simultaneous development of the electronic computer, computer science and technology, addressed most of these changes on an individual basis, making it unnecessary for people to address them collectively or individually; and

c. Recognizing relativity, the changes caused by it and recommending the steps required for implementing these changes required to adopt them, would have required these "Pundits" to say and do things that are contrary to everything based on common sense and conventional wisdom they have professed, preached, and practiced their entire lives, making it something that is egotistically very difficult if not impossible for anyone to do.

d. Last but not least, common sense, conventional wisdom and the law, forbid anyone including "University Professors" from saying and/or doing anything contrary to the dictates of common sense and conventional wisdom under penalty of the law and they are at the risk of ostrasization by society. This makes it logistically impossible for them to make these changes unless the law of the land is modified by a leader and/or by the governing body, Parliament, or Congress and are required to make these changes!

President Obama was informed about the above facts and requested to initiate the making of the required paradigm shift and Constitutional amendment by executive action and complete the orchestration of the Constitutional Amendment in Congress by informing all Congressmen and all Americans about the information given to him as documented here, a process of rapid dissemination of information explosively to implode common sense and replace it with ASET, the shortcut for using Einstein's Philosophy for solving all problems especially those that seem to defy solution using common sense," a process I named "Imploding Einstein's Intellectual Bomb or I-Bomb" in America. Instead, he did the things described in "Obamagate, The Evidence."

ADDENDUM IIB: "THE INFORNATION" GIVEN TO PRESIDENT OBAMA IN PRACTICAL TERMS: "THE INFORMATION" PRESIDENT OBAMA CONCEALED FROM EVERYONE, INCLUDING SEC. CLINTON, AND CONGRESS?
Here is "The Information" given to President Obama in the form of practical facts that he concealed from everyone, plagiarized, fragmented, bastardized, castrated, and rearranged into "catch 22" propositions and plans-of-action that had no chance of ever working ...

a. Common sense, information we obtain using our senses of perception (mainly our senses of sight, hearing and touch) is fallible and does not work under the following five circumstances in physics and therefore, it does not work under the same circumstances in everyday life also.
... When we are dealing with anything moving at the speed (velocity) of light because the velocity of light does not obey the laws of common sense and conventional wisdom (Newton's Laws of Motion) but it abides by the rules of relativity that are the opposite of the laws of common sense (Newton's laws of motion).
... When we are dealing with things that are imperceptible to our senses, instruments and monitors, and/or are unknown and unknowable factors, forces and entities, (like the information Mrs. Clinton needed but did not have while dealing with the Benghazi debacle);
... When we are dealing with extremely large quantities of anything like astronomically large distances, astronomically large periods of time (light years) (and in our digital-atomic age, the astronomically large amounts of information computers dump on us every time we use them);
... When we are dealing with extremely small things or quantities of anything, quantities that are too small to be perceptible to our senses, detectable with our instruments and/or our monitors, or inadequate in number, amount or size, for us to make a decision;
... When common sense does not work, or has failed after an initial success, or after common sense has failed on three occasions, and the has recurred

b. If a problem cannot be solved after three attempts using common sense, it must be considered a "problem that is insoluble" using common sense and must be addressed using one of the algorithms for solving such "problems that seem insoluble.

c. Problems that seem insoluble" can be understood and solved by using the rules of relativity that require one to think thoughts that are the opposite of thoughts based on common sense that will enable comprehension of the problem and they can be solved by doing the opposite of everything dictated by common sense


d. Anything that stops working in the digital-atomic age after having worked (succeeded) initially, stopped working because of a "problem that seems insoluble" that can be solved and what stopped working can be made to work again and not just succeed but excel by piggybacking it (making it hitch a ride on) relativity (ACTINEMAS, or ASET). It will work again if it is humanly possible to make it functional again.

e. The easiest way of incorporating relativity into all our thinking processes so that it will prevent "problems that seem insoluble" from developing or take over and solve them if they develop, is to make a paradigm shift in the way we think and replace the use of common sense with ASET and conventional wisdom withACTINEMAS.
f. The easiest (and only way) of incorporating relativity into all decision-making processes of Democratic governance is to make bipartisanship mandatory in all decision-making processes involving the solution of "problems that seem insoluble" as it is the only way ASET, "the algorithm for the unification of opposing factors and forces" can be incorporated into the democratic decision-making process of debating.

g. If common is used to make decisions or solve problems after it has failed, it will result in "errors in judgment" or "mistakes" being made and the problem one is attempting to solve, will become "a problem that seems insoluble." Continued attempts to solve "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense, will result in development of new, more complex, more severe "problems that seem insoluble," and their varieties, numbers, magnitudes and severity will go on increasing.

h. Those who have time and resources to spare, will compensate by discarding and wasting everything that has stopped working to compensate for their inability to solve "problems that seem insoluble."

i. THE END-RESULT OF USING COMMON SENSE AFTER IT HAS STOPPED WORKING TO SOLVE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" IS TERROR, RANDOM ACTS OF VIOLENCE, TERRORISM AND WAR! People who do not have resources and/or time to spare or waste, will panic when common sense stops working and "problems that seem insoluble develop, proliferate and begin to fester.

When such problems attain and exceed "critical mass," they will cause an explosion that will destroy everything in the lives of those affected, a process I have named "the explosion of the 'Intellectual Bomb' because it will destroy the abilities of everyone involved to think and act rationally as resources deplete. It will also make those affected, terrified.

Common sense will prompt terrified people to terrorize others under the mistaken notion prompted by the non-functioning common sense, that this will somehow help solve their "problems that seem insoluble."

Common sense will then prompt those who are being terrorized to declare war on their tormentors, under the mistaken notion that killing terrorists will somehow solve the problem of terrorism.

War depletes the resources of the terrorists further and friends and family members of terrorists become terrorists and their numbers will grow in geometric proportions. This leads to more acts of terrorism, escalation of the war and the vicious cycle will go on ad nauseam until one or both parties are crippled or destroyed.

This vicious cycle will be interrupted only when the warring parties learn or are taught how to solve their "problems that see insoluble" and as soon as they learn how to solve such problems, the need for terrorism and war disappear and the cycle will end.

It is obvious from what has just been said that terrorism, random acts of violence and war are all consequences of the failure of common sense and conventional wisdom. They are "problems that seem insoluble" and cannot be solved using common sense. They can only be understood, accounted for and solved using the opposite, the rules of relativity, and by doing things that are the opposite of everything dictated by common sense.

Relativity suggests that terrorism, random acts of violence and war are consequences of the inability of people to solve "problems that seem insoluble" and that the problem can be solved by insuring that everyone is aware of what "problems that seem insoluble" are and how they can and must be solved by using the rules of relativity.

j. THE RULES OF RELATIVITY DICTATE THAT "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" CANNOT BE SOLVED BY KILLING ENENIES. THEY CAN ONLY BE SOLVED BY TRANSFORMING ENEMIES INTO FRIENDS AND ALLIES BY RECOGNIZING SHARED COMMONALITIES, THE MOST IMPORTANT COMMONALITY BEING THE FACT THAT THEY WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO SOLVE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" UNLESS THEY UNIFY WITH THEIR ENEMIES AND LEARN TO WORK TOGETHER.

THE RULES OF RELATIVITY ALSO DICTATE THAT ENEMIES ARE ONES GREATEST ASSETS AND RESOURCES FOR SOLVING "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" AND KILING THEM ELIMINATES THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO CAN HELP SOLVE SUCH PROBLEMS. SUCH PROBLEMS CAN ONLY BE SOLVED BY MAKING ONES ENEMIES ONES FRIENDS AND ALLIES FOR EVER AND AS SOON AS BOTH PARTIES REALIZE THIS AND MAKE IT HAPPEN, "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" WILL SOLVE THEMSELVES AND DISAPPEAR!

Instead, President Bush ignored it and President Obama spent every moment of his Presidency trying to kill every terrorist he could find and did nothing to educate himself and the world about the problem of "problems that seem insoluble" and how they can and must be solved. Thus he allowed terrorism to grow like a cancer into ISIS and metastasize all over the world as the frequency of random acts of violence have increased to become everyday events as he continues to blame everyone else he could find for the consequences of his own actions and inactions. The only good thing that has come out of this is that it has proved the validity of the statement that the war on terrorism cannot be won by killing enemies.

EINSTEIN'S A-BOMB ENDED WORLD WAR II IN ONE (INFAMOUS) MOMENT, ADMITTEDLY IN THE MOST UNDESIRABLE WAY. "EINSTEIN'S I-BOMB" CAN PREVENT WORLD WAR III PREEMPTIVELY BEFORE IT HAPPENS AND ELIMINATE THE NEED FOR WAR AS A PROBLEM-SOLVING TOOL FOR SOLVING "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" ANY OTHER WAY, IN THE MOST DESIRABLE WAY, IN ONE MOMENT IN TIME, IF A WORLD LEADER (HOPEFULLY AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT) "IMPLODES EINSTEIN'S I-BOMB" IN HIS/HER COUNTRY (HOPEFULLY, IT AMERICA), AND INFORMS THE WORLD THAT "PROBLMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE" CANNOT BE SOLVED USING COMMON SENSE BUT CAN AND MUST BE SOLVED AT A MOMENT'S NOTICE USING THE RULES OF RELATIVITY!

k. THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY AND THE CONSTITUTION:

When Einstein discovered relativity, it had relevance only in the world of theoretical physics where physicists were studying light transmission.

It had no relevance in everyday life because nothing travelled at the speed of light in everyday life at that time other than light itself and since light itself is imperceptible, relativity was of no consequence. Therefore, Einstein was unable to extend the use of relativity to everyday life and he could perceive no obvious need for it.

Then, the advent of "IT, CS and WOMD" extended the influence of relativity to all areas of human interest and made the Constitution that was authored over a hundred years earlier, non-functional because it had been authored when relativity was unknown and common sense still worked in everyday life!

It was the function of the President as the keeper of the Constitution to keep an eye on the Constitution all the time, and do what was required to keep it functional as required by the oath the Constitution requires the President to take to insure its own integrity.

Unfortunately, no one, not even Einstein, recognized this fact or advised the sitting American President about it because relativity still had no effect on everyday life and Democratic governance during Einstein's lifetime. In addition, Einstein himself could not figure out how to do it, and no one could until the effects of relativity had pervaded everyday life and forced professional problem-solvers to determine how this had to be factored into all their problem-solving-decision-making processes.

President Obama was informed about these needs but proved inadequate to rise to the occasion and ignored it and did worse things with it described in "Obamagate" and listed in (A.10.). Hopefully, this expose will convince him or the next President to make the constitutional Amendment required to make our Constitution functional again.

l. PRESIDENT OBMA'S "DREAM TEAM" OF "UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS" AND HIS "BRAIN 2025" INITIATIVE:

In view of the information given to President Obama in "The Letters" and repeated here, President Obama was advised thatACTINEMAS, the algorithm obtained by the unification of Einstein's algorithm for solving "problems that seem insoluble" in physics with the surgeons' algorithm for solving such problems in medical practice accomplished by the "pursuit of perfection," should be considered the algorithmic pathway the human brain and mind use to think while functioning at peak efficiency and capacity.

He was advised that ACTINEMASmust therefore be considered the pathway we must take if we want to use our brains and minds most efficiently, as computers, as we think, and that making a paradigm shift in the way we think in America by replacing the use of common sense and conventional wisdom that had failed, with ASET and ACTINEMAS respectively, ought to enable all Americans to maximize their abilities to think and function and maximize our abilities to succeed at a nation. It ought to reduce, if not eliminate the chances of people making mistakes. It ought to maximize our chances of success at everything we attempt. Universal awareness of this information, ought to enable everyone to solve "problems that seem insoluble" and thereby eliminating circumstances where people become terrified, and eliminate the need for people to engage in terrorism and violence. It ought to make terror, terrorism and violence dissipate as the need to engage in such activity itself dissipates.

Instead, President Obama did just the opposite as detailed in "Obamagate, The Evidence."

And that raises the next question ...

m. "WHAT DID PRESIDENT OBAMA AND THE LEADERS OF HIS "DREAM TEAM," MAINLY PROF.CORI BARGMANN DO WITH "THE INFORMATION" GIVEN TO HIM IN "THE LETTERS," THAT MAKES HIS "BRAIN 2025 INITIATIVE" A SCIENTIFIC HOAX?
The complete list of all the things President Obama and his Dream Team did with the original concepts and statements of "The Letters" is described in detail in "Obamagate, The Evidence" a transcript of which is posted as a blog at http://www.successateverything.com/blog/100.
Briefly, here is what President Obama did with "The Information" given to him.
He plagiarized all the fundamental statements and concepts given to him in "The Letters" (listed in Addendum I) in which they were conveyed to him, fragmented them, rearranged the fragments and modified them to conform to his personal, common-sense-based opinions, beliefs and Democratic Party policies, to "dress them up" and give them an aura of scientific authenticity. He did not act on any of the original concepts as originally recommended. In the process, he bastardized and castrated Einstein's philosophy of relativity, the plan-of-action that has the potential to solve all the "problems that seem insoluble" that are humanly possible to solve and made our digital-atomic age what it is, into a "catch 22" proposition that had no chance of ever working at anything. Then he used this bastardized, castrated version of relativity to solve all the country's "problems that seem insoluble," that he chose to solve or was forced to address, and gave us Obamacare, "Cash for Clunkers," "The Sequester," ISIS, all the random acts of violence and the predictable and predicted Government shut-down that that occurred towards the end of his first term.
When all the predicted consequences of his actions materialized and proved the validity of the recommendations and the concepts on which they were based towards the end of his first term, President Obama denigrated all the original concepts (that he had ignored and not acted upon) and said they would not work, during his 2013 SOTU Address. Two months later, he announced that he had appointed a "Dream Team" of "University Professors" to implement his "BRAIN 2025" Initiative that was aimed at performing a physical experiment based on his bastardized version of relativity, and to "catalyze a paradigm shift" in the way we think in this country as we solve problems. The paradigm shift President Obama sponsored, would have been a switch in the way we think in this country, to the way his brain functioned, as opposed to the paradigm shift he was requested to orchestrate that was based on the way the brains of Einstein, surgeons and all professional people, work. The difference between the two is the fact that the former never works whereas the latter works ninety-nine times out of hundred if executed properly!
Fortunately for everyone else, and unfortunately for President Obama, Einstein's theory of relativity predicts that the experiment on which he chose to pin his hopes on for his BRAIN Initiative, like everything else he had done, has no logistical chance of ever working, as they are all not in compliance with the rules of relativity that determine what works and what does not, in our digital-atomic age.

n. Since he and his Dream Team were informed about this problem and the consequences of their actions and chose deliberately not to refute these allegations and to persist in their publically funded endeavor in spite of the fact that all the predicted consequences of ignoring these facts have materialized, makes this "BRAIN 2025 Initiative" a scientific hoax.

o. In addition, time, resources and lives are being wasted by the Dream Team by trying to obtain information that already exists, using an experiment that has no logistical chance of working. The delay in the use of existing information to win all the wars we must win that can only be won using this information, makes the Dream Team as culpable as President Obama in Benghazi debacle and the Orlando massacre.

p. Copies of "Obamagate, The Evidence" were sent to President Obama and the leaders of his Dream Team with a request to respond, and refute, or accept its recommendations and reconcile. It was submitted as a Letter of Complaint, a Bill of particulars and a petition for action against President Obama and the leaders of his Dream team alleging plagiarism, alteration of a scientific principle for personal benefit and concealment of information required for public safety that has resulted in unmeasurable harm to all Americans. It was submitted to the Hon. John Boehner, then the Speaker of the house, the Leaders of "The Dream Team." the Chairpersons of the House (The Hon. Michael Conway) and (The Hon. Sen. Barbara Boxer) Senate Ethics Committees, and to Sen. Marco Rubio and Cong. Alan Greyson, Senator and Congressman respectively of my district. Almost two years have passed but none of them have bothered to respond or act upon this petition to date!
I did not take legal action as I do not have the resources and I cannot find or afford a lawyer who would take legal action against the President, and I did not want to leave the country and become a fugitive. I want to prove that the old saying that the pen is mightier than the sword because it is the fact, and because it is time to revisit some of the old sayings that are as true in the digital-atomic age as they were in the days gone by with the difference that we have to substitute more appropriate words like "the blog is mightier than the bomb!"

q. On Sept. 21, 2015 Prof. Cori Bargmann, the lead Co-Chairwoman of BRAIN 2025, gave an interview to a lone N.Y. Times reporter from the privacy of her home, concerning the BRAIN 2025 Initiative. Her concluding statement was: "Scientists were like detectives following a set of clues. Some clues were red herrings. Discarding them was an important step to getting to the right idea."

The concluding statement of an interview is usually the message the grantor of the interview wants to publicize. That raises the question; "Why did Prof, Bargmann make this statement?" The only reason for it, since she did not give another one, has to be considered the fact that she had indeed, found a "red herring" in BRAIN 2025" that she had dropped. If that is the case, "we the people" have a right to know what that red herring was since President Obama has pinned our future, and that of our country and our children, and hundreds of millions of Dollars in public funds that could be used better elsewhere, on this Initiative.
If this interview was her tongue-in-cheek "public" response required of her by "Obamagate, the Evidence," that had drawn her attention to the fact that BRAIN 2025 is itself a "red herring" because it does not conform to or abide by the rules of relativity, making it non-functional in the digital-atomic age, this response is a grossly inadequate non-response. If it is not a response to that allegation, it does not matter because dropping a little "baby red herring" from a fatally flawed Initiative that is itself "a mother of red herrings" is an endeavor in futility.

r. Finally, President Obama was advised that he should use ACTINEMAS, the algorithm for the "pursuit of perfection," every time he did anything to insure that he had done everything he could possibly have done to "uphold the Constitution of the United States to the best of my (his) ability" as required by the Oath he took on assuming office for three reasons; (a) It would insure he had abided by his oath of office; (b) it would insure that he was solving all the "problems that seemed insoluble" that he had to solve, and (c) he would be insuring that he is not creating any new "problems that seem insoluble."

President Obama dismissed this all these thoughts by saying that "We were not sent here (to Washington) to be perfect." Thereby he abrogated his oath because this statement indicates that he had no intention to abide by the stipulations of his oath. Unfortunately for President Obama, his opinion is not in agreement with the law of the land and the conventions of society that require everyone else to abide by these requirements under penalty of the law and the risk of ostrasization by society.
THE END

COPYRIGHT
Featured ASET Thoughts
ASET in Action