How can you use ASET?
  1. Solve problems that defy solution.
  2. Make seemingly impossible
    dreams come true.
  3. Create choices when you
    do not know what to do.
The breakthrough program that will enable you to do your best every time you do anything. When you were a child, your were taught to walk and talk, sing and dance, but no one taught you to think. Learn how to use the concepts of ASET and ACTINEMAS to think like Einstein without being a genius, and perform like a surgeon without even being a doctor.
Do your best every time
you do
anything and
pursue excellence 24/7.

Obamagate, The Evidence

SUBJECT: TWENTY FIVE FACTS SUPPORTING THE ALLEGATION THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA'S "BRAIN-MAPPING INITIATIVE" IS AN ACT OF GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED PLAGIARISM, COVER-UP OF THIS FACT, A "CATCH 22" PROPOSITION AND THE SCIENTIFIC, PRECEDENT-BASED EVIDENCE THAT PRESIDENT OBAMA HAS NOT ABIDED BY HIS OATH OF OFFICE

August 18 2014

1. PREAMBLE:
There are twenty five actual pieces of evidence that justify "The Allegation" that President Obama's "BRAIN-Mapping Initiative is an act of government-sponsored plagiarism, a cover-up of this fact and a "catch 22" proposition that has no chance of ever working in addition to being the scientific and precedent-based evidence that he has not abided by the obligations of The Oath he took upon assuming office. Before presenting these twenty five pieces of evidence-based facts, I shall eliminate any ambiguity that there may arise from variations in past and present word usage across past and present blogs by briefly summarizing what I have said in my last two blogs "Obamagate, The Story" and "Obamagate, The Allegation," ".

2. SUMMARY OF "OBAMAGATE, THE STORY."
In this blog, I had said in effect that I had informed President Obama that Einstein, surgeons , all professional people, perfectionists, entrepreneurs and innovators who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past, have proved that such problems develop because "common sense and conventional wisdom," the paradigms of thought and action we use to do everything we do, are fallible, that they will eventually fail every time we use them and result in the development of "problems that seem insoluble" using "common sense and conventional wisdom." Such problems will solve themselves or become amenable to easy solution upon shifting our paradigms of thought and action from those based on "common sense and conventional wisdom" the failure of which caused them in the first place, to those based on algorithms based on relativity that make us think thoughts and do things that are the opposite of everything dictated by "common sense and conventional wisdom." This is the "principle of relativity" as it applies to everyday life and democratic governance, an original thought expressed for the first time and only at my website.
"The Recommendation" of "The Letters" was based on the above considerations. They consisted of the following elements, all original thoughts expressed only at my website;

2.1: That President Obama should have "orchestrated in the everyday life and democratic governance of America, the paradigm shift Einstein orchestrated in the world of physics; "that this change was based on the understanding of how the human brain works as the mind thinks as it obtains information, processes it, thinks about it, understands it, remembers it and makes plans of action to deal with it as established by the experiences of Einstein, surgeons, all other professional people, perfectionists, entrepreneurs and innovators who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past, continue to do so at present and will continue to do so into the future;

2.2: That President Obama should have initiated this process by the executive act of "Imploding Einstein's Intellectual Bomb or the I-Bomb"" in America, the term I had coined for the act of disseminating information as to what Einstein had done, why he did it, how he did it in physics, and why and how every man woman and child living on earth must make this change in his/her own personal world of everyday life and why Congress should do in the world of democratic governance in America;

2.3: That he and Congress must make this change in democratic governance by doing what it takes to orchestrate the making of a Constitutional Amendment that would make bipartisanship mandatory for the solution of all "problems that seem insoluble" because bipartisanship is the method our founding fathers had correctly recognized to be the method for using ASET, the shortcut for using ACTINEMAS, the algorithm Einstein and others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" used, and make its use mandatory in all democratic decision-making processes aimed at solving such problems;

2.4: That the scientific need for making this change now urgently, is the fact that a fundamental change has occurred in life on earth since our founding fathers authored our Constitution. This change is the fact that that information now travels at the speed of light, thanks to information technology and Einstein has proved that "common sense and conventional wisdom" will stop working" under these circumstances and the rules of relativity are the only rules that work, when we are dealing with anything that travel at the velocity of light. Whereas, information used to travel at the slower "animal" speeds of everyday life when Newton enunciated his Laws of nature (motion) that ruled supreme in the days of yore when our Constitution was authored and until the advent of electronic transmission of information became the norm;

2.5: The second reason for making this change is the fact that the human mind is capable of dealing with only one thought (fact) at a time. The advent of computer technology makes monumental amounts of facts available at a moment's notice totally overwhelming the capacity of any mind even that of the smartest genius, to function, in no time. The only way anyone can remain functional under such circumstances when there is literally no time to think, is by learning to think at the speed at which information becomes available which, in our digital-atomic age, is the speed of light. The only way anyone can think so fast is by determining how the mind obtains, processes and uses information at ordinary workable speeds and piggybacking this information on a beam of light and making the process of thinking move at the speed of light to catch up with it and eventually overtake it by gaining the ability to predict what is going to happen in the future based on our knowledge of what has happened in the past. The only way anyone can use this information that exists in our past having been invented, discovered and developed by Einstein is by incorporating what Einstein learned by travelling at the sped of light in his mind to discover what happens at this speed, the things he summarized as his theory of relativity, and adding a step to our protocol for thinking and doing everything, to account for these facts. Anyone who expresses as algorithms what all the people who have done this in the past have done to solve problems that seem insoluble like Einstein and the surgeons, and the others enumerated earlier, will get the algorithms I got by doing the same, the algoriths I have named ACTINEMAS and ASET. This was the justification for my making "The Recommendations" i have made to President Obama in "The Letters."

2.6: The third reason for making this paradigm shift is the fact that failure to do so when "common sense and conventional wisdom" stop working and fail, is that continued usage of "common sense and conventional wisdom" to solve problems that seem insoluble, will result in the explosive destruction of everything involved in the process I have named "the uncontrolled explosion of Einstein's I-Bomb, whereas making such a shift will transform this uncontrolled explosion into a controlled implosion in which one will remain in control and be able to engineer a resolution that will occur spontaneously or with minimal assistance enabled by using ACTINEMAS, and orchestrate the resolution of all "problems that seem insoluble" that are amenable to human solution (those that we can logistically solve).
The Letters had informed President Obama that continued adherence to usage of "common sense and conventional wisdom" after they had stopped working was the fundamental cause for his inability to preside effectively and for Congress being so non-functional the way things have been during his entire Presidency, an event that "The Letters" had warned him would happen if he ignored "The Recommendations" they contained. The Letters" had warned President Obama that the following consequences would ensue if he ignored "The Recommendations" of "The Letters;" he would be unable to succeed at anything he tried, everything he accomplished would be questionable at best, short-lived, and fail sooner than later, he will make matters worse and that he would never win the war on terror and violence or ever turn the country around from the tail-spin to oblivion it has been in for years from which escape seems impossible at this time. The only way out of this predicament, he was informed, is to solve all the "problems that seem to defy solution (seem insoluble") at this time using common sense and conventional wisdom") by making a paradigm shift in the way we think and act as we do everything, from using methods based on "common sense and conventional wisdom" that leads to such problems to methods based on relativity that prevent their development and solve the ones that have already developed.
President Obama had been advised and warned that he should have made this "paradigm shift" as the first thing he did upon assuming office, or the first thing he did upon receipt of each of the seven following "Letters," as "The Change" he promised to make, the promise that enabled him to get elected in the first place, the promise he forgot all about as soon as he was elected.

3. SUMMARY OF "OBAMAGATE, THE ALLEGATION"
The fundamental elements of "The Allegation" were as follows;

3.1: That President Obama ignored all "The Letters," "The Concepts" and "The Recommendations" they contained and

3.2: When the predicted consequences of ignoring them materialized and proved their veracity, he denigrated their fundamental components at his 2013 "State Of The Union Address" and

3.3: Two months later, he announced that he had appointed a "Dream Team" of "some of the brightest minds in the country" chosen from its population of "University Professors," and authorized the implementation of his "BRAIN-Mapping Initiative." or "BRAIN" or "The Initiative;

3.4: That the fundamental components of "BRAIN" were identical to fundamental components of "The Concept" and "The Recommendations" of "The Letters," that he had just denigrated with one fundamental difference. The sequence of events that constituted the fundamental steps of the plan-of-action the "Dream Team" had formulated to implement this "Initiative" was the "mirror-image-opposite" of the sequence of events that constituted the fundamental steps of "The Recommendations" of "The Letters."

3.5: That this switch was one he probably thought would prevent allegations of plagiarism but it did not because this change essentially transformed "The BRAIN Initiative" into a "catch 22" proposition that has no chance of ever working, making this difference a moot point;

3.6: That this switch was caused by the "logistical inability of the 'University Professors' leading his 'Dream team,' working out of "Ivory Towers of tradition" to make paradigm shifts because making such shifts "requires saying and doing things that are contrary to everything these pundits have professed, preached and practiced from the beginning of time." (Evidence for the full justification of this statement was given in "Obamagate, The Allegation").

3.7: That President Obama had been warned that this was the reason why "The Letters" had advised him to make the "paradigm shift himself, by executive action and not rely upon "University Professors' to make it for him."

3.8: That as a result of ignoring this warning along with the others warnings, President Obama essentially allowed the only scientific concept that turned the world of theoretical physics around from an impasse, the only scientific concept that could have done the same for the everyday life of every American, the everyday life of our country and our civilization, (the principle of relativity as it applies to everyday life and democratic governance) to be bastardized into a "Catch 22" proposition that had no chance of ever working.

3.9: That, President Obama has, as a result, squandered the only chance the country and the civilization has had in a long time, to have its "seemingly insoluble problems" solved.

3.10: That, in addition and as a consequence of his inactions and actions, President Obama has essentially allowed the country to totter on the verge of preventable disaster during his entire term, covered-up these facts and continues to do so in spite of the fact that nothing has done or is doing, has been viable or is working effectively, or holds out any promise of ever working in the long run, or has had any of the desired and hoped-for results.

3.11: That furthermore, as a direct result of his failure to act upon the fundamental scientific reason for the cause of all the country's "problems that seem insoluble" and the inability of previous Presidents to succeed at solving them or recognizing and acting upon the fundamental scientific cause for these problems even after his attention was drawn to them and their solutions, constitutes a failure on his part, to have abided by the oath he took upon assuming office. This Oath, "to uphold the Constitution to the best of my ability." required him to do what it takes to amend the Constitution and make it work again any time it stops working for any reason, the way it has done now as a result of the fact that information travels at the speed of light transmission now as opposed to the speeds of everyday life when it was written and the rules of relativity prevail over everything now, where their opposite, Newton's Laws, ruled supreme when the Constitution was authored and no one has done anything to address this issue in more than the hundred years that have passed since Einstein discovered these facts as his theory of relativity.

3.12: That these facts taken together, qualify President Obama's "BRAIN-Mapping Initiative" to be considered OBAMAGATE, the plagiarism (theft of intellectual property archived at the website at www.succesateverything.com), authorization of the bastardization (botching-up) of the only scientific concept that could have turned the country around, covering up of this fact, and his failure to abide by the oath he took upon assuming office, essentially the intellectual equivalent of the Watergate scandal, only worse.
Here now, are the twenty five of the most poignant pieces of evidence to prove everything I have just said.

4. OBAMGATE, THE EVIDENCE;
"The Evidence" supporting the allegations made in "Obamagate, The Allegation," can be classified into three categories;

4.1: Twelve statements made by President Obama that are near-verbatim repetitions of statements used in "The Letters" describing "The Concepts" and "The Recommendations," many of them original concepts, that he used without permission, without acknowledgement of their source, and without crediting the original authors; acts of common courtesy that when ignored, constitutes plagiarism by definition. The people whose works he plagiarized were, Einstein, surgeons, all professional people like engineers and navigators, entrepreneurs, innovators, and perfectionists like my father and yours truly who recognized, defined and described the concepts of ACTINEMAS and ASET.
In this presentation, I shall recognize each statement made by the President that plagiarized an original concept and then recognize "The Concept/s" or statement/s of "The Letters" that were plagiarized and/or denigrated, and document my responses to President Obama's unsubstantiated claims that these concepts do not and/or will not work. Then, I shall make brief comments to justify the accusations made here as they apply to those individual circumstances. I shall list these statements in their descending order of poignancy rather than the chronological order in which President Obama made them. I shall begin with the three statements President Obama made during his 2013 "State of The Union Address" because they are the most poignant ones for two reasons; (a) the fact that he made them on an occasion as important as a "State of The Union Address," as the first policy-setting speech of his second term and (b) because, together, they prove that he failed to abide by the oath he took upon assuming office by definition, and proves that this is the fundamental reason why he has been so ineffective and Congress has been so dysfunctional during his entire Presidency! All the statements referred to above can be categorized into four subgroups as follows;

(a) Three statements made by President Obama during his 2013 "State of the Union Address," the most poignant ones;

(b) Three statements made by President Obama and Prof. Newsome while announcing the implementation of "The Initiative" in April of 2013 that reveal the plagiarism, and the bastardization of relativity as it applies to everyday life and democratic governance into a "Catch 22" proposition that can never work;

(c) Two statements made by President Obama after the announcement of his "Initiative" as his concluding remarks that were tantamount to adding insult to injury to those whose concepts he had plagiarized, all the people of the world whom he deprived of a chance to have their "problems that seem insoluble" solved, and engaging in frivolity as his country burned from his own inequities.

(d) Four statements made by President Obama during his First Term that laid down the foundation for "Obamagate."

4.2: Eight "Letters to The President" or "The Letters" in which I had conveyed "The Concepts" in question to President Obama that were plagiarized and bastardized into fundamental components of "The Initiative," the "black and white" evidence for all the allegations made here.

4.3: Five pieces of "Circumstantial Evidence," consisting of clusters of statements made by the leaders of President Obama's "Dream Team" that support "The Allegations" made here. These five pieces of circumstantial evidence provide circumstantial evidence for these allegations that are as convincing if not more convincing than wghat has been presented so far.

However, these five pieces of circumstantial evidence also provide a window of an opportunity for President Obama and the leaders of his "Dream Team" to redeem themselves by claiming to be victims of circumstances, because they reveal that plagiarism, bastardization of relativity and cover-up of these actions were the only common-sense-and-conventional-wisdom-based options President Obama and his "Dream Team" had. Unfortunately, for President Obama, this window still exists because he has still not done what he should have done upon assuming office. To avail themselves of this opportunity, President Obama and the leaders of his "Dream Team" must acknowledge the true nature of "The Initiative," the fact that the information they are out to invent, discover and implement, already exists having been invented, discovered, developed and implemented by Einstein and the others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past, and doing what it takes to reverse the consequences of their past actions and inactions as recommended in "The Letters."

Whereas, these facts constitute the most credible pieces of circumstantial evidence, they also provide the most convincing proof of the need for the paradigm shift recommended in "The Letters" as the only solution available to possibly solve all the "problems that seem insoluble" any other way.

5. THE TWELVE STATEMENTS MADE BY PRESIDENT OBAMA THAT REVEAL BLATANT PLAGIARISM OF THE ORIGINAL CONCEPTS OF "THE LETTERS," THE PLAGIARIZED CONCEPTS/STATEMENTS, AND REBUTTALS TO THE PRESIDENT'S CLAIM THAT THESE CONCEPTS WILL NOT WORK.

In their descending order of poignancy, these statements were:

5.1: THE FIRST STATEMENT MADE DURING THE 2013 STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS.
THE STATEMENT: "OUR ACTIONS WILL NOT PREVENT EVERY SENSELESS ACT OF VIOLENCE IN THIS COUNTRY"
THE PLAGIARIZED STATEMENTS FROM "THE LETTERS" that were in addition, denigrated by this statement were: (a) That most acts of violence "represent the efforts of people driven to desperation by their inability to solve 'problems that seem insoluble,'" and (b) that President Obama could have reduced, if not eliminated the occurrence of such problems by "Imploding Einstein's Intellectual Bomb or the I-Bomb" in America" the term I had coined to describe the process of informing all Americans with explosive efficiency and precision, how anyone could solve any such "problem that seems insoluble," (provided it is amenable to human solution), using the method Einstein, surgeons and others referred to repeatedly in "The Letters," have solved them in the past, continue to solve them at present and will continue to solve them in the future.
MY RESPONSE: I could find no documented reason for President Obama to make this statement other than to justify specifically, his failure to act upon "The Concept" and "The Recommendation" expressed in "The Letters" as stated above, by decrying them and saying that they would not have worked had he acted upon them.
COMMENT: President Obama's statement is unacceptable because it states that a method (an algorithm) that has been used successfully by Einstein and everyone else who has ever solved a "problem that seems insoluble" in the past, will not work and solve similar problems in everyday life and democratic governance, without offering a single piece of evidence to justify his statement and without having tried to determine if it works, before denigrating it. The most convincing argument against President Obama's statement is his own continued inaction that has allowed this trend to persist, and such events to increase in number, frequency and severity to the point that they have become daily events and threaten to become still more frequent. Besides, there is no other solution to the problem on the horizon raising two questions; (a) What do we loose by trying a problem-solving method that has worked every time someone has tried it elsewhere? and (b) How many children and innocent people must die or be maimed here and abroad before President Obama will be convinced that "common sense and conventional wisdom" he has been using and advocating during his entire Presidency, are not working, and the time for making a paradigm shift to something else that works, has long since come and gone?

5.2: THE SECOND OF THREE STATEMENTS MADE DURING THE 2013 "STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS;"
THE STAEMENT: "No laws, NO ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS will PERFECTLY solve ALL THE CHALLENGES ("problems that seem insoluble") I have outlined tonight…"
STATEMENTS OF "THE LETTERS" PLAGIARIZED AND DECRIED: This statement decried two statements of "The Letters. They were; (a) President Obama should have "initiated the process of orchestrating a Constitutional Amendment that would make bipartisanship mandatory in all democratic decision-making processes for the solution of 'problems that seem insoluble,' by an ADMINISTRATIVE ACT;" and (b) That this would have enabled him, Congress and every American "to find the best (PERFECT) solutions possible under the circumstances for all national, international and personal problems (PERFECTLY SOLVE them)" and would have enabled them "to PURSUE PERFECTION (exercise due diligence) in the discharge of their duties."
RESPONSE: This statement of President Obama's is unacceptable for the following six reasons enumerated in the first of "The Letters" and reinforced seven more times in the remaining ones.

• All the problems the sitting American President and the American Congress would ever have to solve would always be "problems that seem insoluble" using "common sense and conventional wisdom" (because all other "problems that seem soluble" using "common sense and conventional wisdom" would have been solved by others and would not require their attention!

• Einstein and others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past have proved the following facts; (a) that all such problems are caused by the single fact that "common sense and conventional wisdom" are fallible and will eventually fail every time we use them; (b) that this will result in the development of "problems that seem insoluble (defy solution) using 'common sense and conventional wisdom'" as they are the effects of their failures; (c) that all such problems can be comprehended and solved by the single act of shifting our paradigms of thought and action from one based on "common sense and conventional wisdom" to one based on relativity, a philosophy that consists of thinking and doing things that are "the opposite of everything dictated by 'common sense and conventional wisdom'" whenever "common sense and conventional wisdom" fail and cause "problems that seem insoluble" to develop. These commonalities represent relativity as it applies to everyday life and democratic governance. Together, they constitute a biological phenomenon and fact of life that I have learned from studying surgery and being a surgeon for over forty years. It is also one that all the theoretical physicists I have approached, refuse to accept for the logistical and egotistical reasons detailed in "The Letters" and summarized in my last blog. It is the biological basis of Einstein's theory of relativity that enables his theory to work every time it is used in theoretical physics and it is the physical basis of surgery that enables the philosophy of surgery to work every time it is used in the practice of medicine to solve problems that cannot be solved any other way. There is no reason why it should not work in everyday life and democratic governance and enable President Obama and all Americans to do things they cannot do any other way.

• Einstein's actions have proved the following facts; (a) there is only one effective method of making a paradigm shift; (b) that method is for someone with the courage of his/her convictions and the audacity to assume an authoritative, leadership role, someone like Einstein himself, a Commander-in-Chief armed with the relevant information, or other person with the same kind of information and the capability of doing something of this kind, to make the required paradigm shift and (c) replace the use of the old paradigm based on "common sense and conventional wisdom," for solving all problems, with the use of an algorithm based on "ACTINEMAS," that Einstein used to solve "problems that seem insoluble," thereby (d) "Imploding Einstein's I-Bomb" in the population. (e) In addition, that person must do this by an administrative act such as the postulation a theory like the theory of relativity by Einstein in physics and extending the existing theory of relativity to everything else in life, or postulating a new theory that would amount to reinventing the wheel that has already been invented.
In everyday life and democratic governance, the simplest, most effective and only way "we, the people" can accomplish what Einstein accomplished in theoretical physics, is to have their leader, the President, to do what it takes to actively orchestrate this change by the administrative act of amending the constitution that dictates what shall happen in that state or country. As a result, in this country, such an act will be one required to uphold the constitution as demanded by the oath of office taken by the President of the Union and an act based on science and required by it, for the country's survival.

• President Obama's argument is unacceptable because bipartisanship is the method of implementing the use of ASET, the shortcut for using ACTINEMAS, the algorithm for solving "problems that seem insoluble" for reasons given in "The Letters." I can think of no reason, and President Obama has offered none, as to why he should not have been able to initiate the process of solving all the country's "problems that seem insoluble" by making bipartisanship mandatory in all democratic decision-making processes for the solution of such problems by a constitutional amendment, initiated by an executive act by himself as recommended in "The Letters." Simply saying that it wont work is not enough because this "recommendation" has been validated by the observation that Congress works most efficiently and solves all problems at hand every time it functions in a bipartisan mode such as during war-time when it functions "on a war footing," and during peacetime whenever it functions in this mode for any other reason. It becomes dysfunctional at all other times. In addition, this is the driving reason why all Presidents, including President Obama himself, have pled for bipartisanship every time they wanted to accomplish anything of consequence.

• Last but not least, is the fact that is unappreciated at this time, the fact that "rule by the will of the majority" is, in the ultimate analysis, dictatorship by the majority! It ought to be as unacceptable as any other form of dictatorship to all people who believe in democracy, including the so-called "majority." In addition, it is a concept that will stop working when the difference between the numbers of "the majority" and those of "the minority," cease to exist resulting in equalization that makes "rule by the will of the majority" not just undesirable, but also a non-functional pipe dream. When the Constitution becomes non-functional frequently, aspects of the Constitution responsible for this eventuality become unacceptable and must be amended to remedy this problem. Failure to do this by the leadership is what triggers revolutions. One should not wait for the Union to be destroyed by such a revolution before the leadership takes such action, if democracy is to persist into the future as a viable form of governance. The best way of insuring that the will of the minority is incorporated into the democratic decision-making process is to make bi-partisanship mandatory in all decision-making processes and the best way of initiating this process is to make it mandatory in those involving the solution of "problems that seem insoluble where it is a scientific requirement not a matter of opinion. Eventually, it must be made the norm in all democratic decision-making processes.

• "The Letters" had also informed President Obama that ACTINEMAS is, in addition to being the algorithm for solving "problems that seem insoluble," a checklist of "everything the human body and mind can do" in a given instance. This consideration makes it the algorithm that defines the exercise of "due diligence" as clarified by the precedents set at the tort litigations of medical malpractice trials to mean "doing everything one could possibly have done under the circumstances." This is also the definition of "the pursuit of perfection derived by my father and given to me as "Father's Advice" for the solution of "problems that seem insoluble, or "problems that seem to defy solution" in my everyday life as I have described in "The Letters" and in my e-book "My Journey to ASET.

• These facts make the requirements for "the pursuit of perfection" to mean the same as the legal requirements for the exercise of "due diligence."
COMMENT: It was for the above reasons that I said in "The Letters" that the replacement of the use of "common sense and conventional wisdom" with the use of ACTINEMAS and ASET, the algorithms Einstein and others have used to "pursue perfection" while solving "problems that seem insoluble," would have enabled President Obama and Congress to solve all the country's "problems that seem insoluble" and "PURSUE PERFECTION" in the discharge of their duties at the same time! President Obama has yet to offer a single valid argument to justify his claim to the contrary.

5.3: THE THIRD OF THREE STATEMENTS MADE DURING THE 2013 "STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS"
THE STATEMENT: "We were not sent here TO BE PERFECT."
THE PLAGIARIZED, DECRIED STATEMENT FROM "THE LETTERS"... was the statement that the only way President Obama was ever going to preside over the solution of the country's "problems that seem insoluble" would be by engaging in "the pursuit perfection" in the discharge of his duties and insisting that Congress do the same, enabled by the use of ACINEMAS and ASET, the algorithms for solving "problems that seem insoluble" that happen to be also the algorithms for the pursuit of perfection too.

RESPONSE: I have just given the reasons for making this recommendation as it applies to President Obama and Congress in the last section and I shall not repeat them here.

COMMENT: If President Obama really thinks that he was "not sent to Washington to be perfect'" (to pursue perfection), he is working under a delusion because the oath he took upon assuming office "to uphold the Constitution of the United States "TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY," required him legally "to pursue perfection" in the discharge of his duties, for reasons already stated. These facts make the fundamental and legal reason by definition as to why President Obama has been unable to meet "The Challenges" (solve the "problems that seem insoluble") that he enumerated and lamented he could not meet, during his 2013 "State of The Union Address." This consideration makes the fact that his failures were caused by the fact that HE HAD FAILED TO ABIDE BY THE OATH HE TOOK UPON ASSUMING THE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT "to uphold the Constitution of the United States "TO THE BEST OF HIS ABILITY."

One of the requirements of this oath is to amend the Constitution and make it functional again whenever it is rendered non-functional. At present, the insidious extension of relativity to everyday life and democratic governance by the advent of Information Technology and computer science is the fundamental driving force that determines what happens every time because they have enabled massive amounts of information to travel at the velocity of light and become available every time something happens and makes it possible for catastrophic events to occur at a moment's notice if not addressed immediately with maximum precision. This is the fundamental fact that has made "common sense" and conventional wisdom" non-functional if not obsolete! One cannot expect a lay President to appreciate and act upon such an eventuality by himself. However, failure to act upon it appropriately after it was brought to his attention repeatedly, constitutes negligence in the discharge of his duties by definition. Appointing his "Dream Team" of "University Professors" to deal with it did not address the second issue, because of the fact that "University Professors" are logistically incapable of making paradigm shifts" that he was appraised of repeatedly.
Relegating the responsibility for doing something he had been informed, only he could have done, to people he was warned could not do it without exercising the required due diligence, even though this was what he was expected to do based on conventional wisdom, was poor judgment at best.
This argument cannot be used as an excuse to mitigate negligence because it is unacceptable behavior unbecoming an elected officer of the law and only adds to its gravity because he had already been given evidence-based reasons why conventional wisdom had stopped working and why "University Professors" are logistically incapable of making paradigm shifts.

5.4: THE FOURTH STATEMENT, THE FIRST OF THREE STATEMENTS MADE BY PRESIDENT OBAMA, AND PROF. NEWSOME ON HIS BEHALF, SEPARATELY AND TOGETHER, WHILE ANNOUNCING THEIR "BRAIN-MAPPING INITIATIVE."

THE STATEMENT: Prof. Newsome described on behalf of President Obama, that THE AIMS of their "Initiative" were all of the following; (a) "TO SOLVE (actively) A 'PROBLEM THAT SEEMS INSOLUBLE' AT THIS TIME"…(b) that of mapping millions of brain cells as they function as we think... and (c) recognized their OBJECTIVE to be "the hope" that the information generated would eventually... "CATALYZE A PARADIGM SHIFT (passively)...(d) that would enable people to think and act more efficiently, create jobs, stimulate the economy and turn the country around"

THE STATEMENT OF "THE LETTERS" PLAGIARIZED (and bastardized)...was the one that did all of the following; (a) described "THE AIM" of "The Letters," to be to require President Obama to ORCHESTRATE (actively) in everyday life and democratic governance, THE PARADIGM SHIFT that Einstein and others have proved can SOLVE ALL "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INOLUBLE," "by an ADIMISTRATIVE ACT"; and (b) have Congress complete the process democratically by amending the Constitution to make bipartisanship mandatory in all democratic decision-making processes for solving "problems that seem insoluble," and that (c) THE OBJECTIVE of "The Letters" was to solve of ALL PROBLEMS THAT SEEMD INOLUBLE" that confronted the nation and its citizens when President Obama assumed office and prevent new ones from developing.

MY RESPONSE: Comparing and contrasting the two plans makes it obvious that "The Aim" of "The Initiative," TO SOLVE ONE "problem that seems insoluble (an active process)" that of mapping the brain as it functions while the mind is thinking, by developing all the paraphernalia required to solve it with the hope that the information it generates, will CATALYZE (a passive process) the paradigm shift that will solve all the remaining "problems that seem insoluble" is a "catch 22" proposition. This is so because no one is ever going to be able to solve any "problem that seems insoluble," including and especially that of brain-mapping to determine how it thinks, without someone actively orchestrating the paradigm shift required to solve all such problems. This is the paradigm shift the "dream team" is dreaming of catalyzing passively by somehow solving the one "problem that seems insoluble" of brain-mapping. This fact was recognized and addressed in "the Letters" by requiring President Obama to actively orchestrate that paradigm shift but this effort was sabotaged by the President himself by denigrating and bastardizing "The Concept" and "The Recommendations" of "The Letters," by plagiarizing parts of them that appealed to him while ignoring and denigrating the rest, rendering all of them non-functional and giving all of them a bad name.

COMMNT: There are two problems with the two hopes the "Dream Team" has for "The Initiative;" (a) The first problem is the fact that paradigm shifts just do not happen passively for the logistical reason that they are intellectual changes that involve actively recognizing and elimination by ignoring, everything based on the old paradigm based on "common sense and conventional wisdom" that are not working in ones mind, and deliberately switching to thinking thoughts and doing things that are the opposite of everything dictated by the old paradigm as the dictates of the new paradigm based on ACTINEMAS and ASET. This is a "change in intellectual and physical gears" that simply cannot occur passively by themselves or be catalyzed by any other process. The only way they could occur passively is AFTER a leader has orchestrated this change in the way the population thinks and acts by changing the algorithms they have been following and replacing them with algorithms based on the new ways of thought and action and require the population to learn how to do the same in individual occasions by active, deliberate, conscious and educated intervention in the form of a deliberate gear-shift; (b) Their second hope that they will be able to solve a "problem that seem insoluble" de novo is also something that cannot occur logistically as confirmed by the experience of Einstein and everyone else who has ever solved such problems in the past. The experiences of all these people have proved that such problems will not become soluble until everyone involved actively orchestrates the required paradigm shift in the way they were thinking and acting when these problems developed when most of such problems will solve themselves and the rest will become amenable to easy solution by simple methods. The experiences of these people have also shown that continued attempts to solve such "problems that seem insoluble" using the "common sense and conventional wisdom" the failure of which caused them in the first place, will result in the explosive failure of everything involved, a phenomenon I have named "the uncontrolled explosion of 'Einstein's I-Bomb.'" It is an event that will paralyze ones ability to think, intellectually and destroy ones ability to do anything physically, as exemplified in democratic governance by the last government-shut-down that took place recently in Washington, a peek at what is to come if the prevailing concepts are not revised soon.

5.5: THE FIFTH STATEMENT AND THE SECOND OF THREE MADE BY PROF. NEWSOME ON BEHALF OF PRESIDENT OBAMA TO DESCRIBE "THE METHOD" BY WHICH THEY EXPECTED "THE INITIATIVE" TO WORK

THE STATEMENT: Prof. Newsome described "THE METHOD" by which the "Dream Team" expected "The Initiative" to work, by saying that "THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY MAPPING THE PATHWAYS ALONG WHICH MILLIONS OF BRAIN CELLS COMMUNICATE AS THEY FUNCTION WHILE WE THINK, UNDERSTAND AND REMEMBER...WILL, WHEN AVAILABLE...ENABLE PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND HOW THE BRAIN WORKS AND...ENABLE THEM TO THINK MORE EFFECTIVELY... "OPEN UP WHOLE NEW WAYS OF THINKING AND...WHOLE NEW PLAYING FIELDS." President Obama Added that it will ENABLE AMERICANS TO BECOME MORE INNOVATIVE AND ENTREPRENEUREAL AND THINK OF THINGS BEFORE OTHERS CAN DO SO, AND THEREBY STIMULATE THE ECOMONY, CREATE JOBS AND TURN THE COUNTRY AROUND.

"THE CONCEPT OF "THE LETTERS" PLAGIARIZED by this statement...was the one that had recommended to President Obama that he should..."ORCHESTRATE IN AMERICA ...A PARADIGM SHIFT IN THE WAY WE THINK AND ACT AS WE SOLVE "PROBLEMS," especially those "that seem insoluble"...BASED ON AN UNDERSTANDING OF HOW THE BRAIN WORKS AS THE MIND THINKS AS WE OBTAIN INFORMATION, PROCESS IT, THINK, UNDERSTAND, REMEMBER and MAKE PLANS-OF-ACTION, ...information already in existence...having been invented, discovered, developed and used by Einstein, surgeons and all the others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble in the past...by informing all Americans with explosive efficiency... of the process I have named "Imploding Einstein's I-Bomb in America"...a process that would enable ordinary people to think and act like geniuses, professional people, entrepreneurs, innovators and perfectionists, and enable them to open up new ways of thinking and whole new pathways of thought and action to solve problems they could not solve before...and enjoy explosive success at everything at which success is humanly possible to attain.


MY RESPONSE: Comparing and contrasting these two statements reveals that the methods of both are identical, except for the fact that "The Letters" recognize the fact that the information "The BRAIN Initiative" hopes to "invent and discover" has been discovered, invented, discovered, developed, and perfected by Einstein, the surgeons and others, using their brains and minds as instruments, laboratories, computers and GPS devices, and is in use by the people who solve "problems that seem insoluble" for a living as recognized in "The Letters," whereas the "Dream Team" is hoping and dreaming of "reinventing this wheel, by discovering new physical instruments, new physical computer science, new mathematics, new physical technology and everything else physical" de novo using a plan-of-action that is a "catch 22" fiasco that has no chance of ever working! THE FACT THAT THIS INFORMATION WAS PRE-EXISTING AND HAD BEEN GIVEN TO PRESIDENT OBAMA TWO YEARS BEFORE PROF. MIYOUNG CHUN PIONEERED HIS "BRAIN-MAPPING INITIATIVE" for him, and four years before he and Prof. Newsome announced it, MAKES THIS "INITIATIVE" DE FACTO, A CASE OF PLAGIARISM AND IT MUST BE CONSIDERED A CASE OF RES IPSA LOQITUR UNLESS PRESIDENT OBAMA AND/OR THE LEADERS OF HIS "DREAM TEAM" CAN PROVE OTHERWISE!. In addition, the five pieces of circumstantial evidence listed in Section (3) under the heading of "Circumstantial Evidence that proves that plagiarization, bastardization of this information and covering up these facts was the only option afforded to President Obama and his "Dream Team," by the "common sense and conventional wisdom" they profess to use in everything they do," removes any vestige of any doubt that may remain and "makes the cheese most binding" in this instance.

5.6: THE SIXTH STATEMENT, THE THIRD ONE MADE BY PROF. NEWSOME ON BEHALF OF PRESIDENT OBAMA TO DESCRIBE "THE OBJECTIVE" OF "THE INITIATIVE"

THE STATEMENT: This statement was made by Prof. Newsome on behalf of President Obama and defined THE ULTIMATE OBJECTIVE of "The Initiative" by saying that... "WE ARE REALLY OUT TO CATALYZE A PARADIGM SHIFT."


THE STATEMENT OF THE LETTERS PLGIARIZED by this statement is the one that stated that President Obama should have orchestrated a paradigm shift in the way we think and act as we solve "problems that seem insoluble" as the first thing he did actively, upon assuming office."

MY RESPONSE: This statement of Prof. Newsome's validates all the allegations made here for the following reasons;

• It exposes the fact that the real intention (hope) of the "Dream Team" is to "catalyze" (passively for President Obama), the paradigm shift that "The Letters" had recommended he ought to have (actively) orchestrated as the first thing he did upon assuming office if he wanted to succeed at anything he attempted in his efforts to turn the country around, after all the consequences of ignoring this recommendation had materialized and proved the veracity of this recommendation;

• It justifies completely, the warning given to President Obama that he should have orchestrated the paradigm shift required to turn the country around ACTIVELY by himself by an executive act and not delegated or relegated this responsibility to "University Professors" because they are logistically incapable of having anything to do with paradigm shifts actively, for reasons already enumerated, and that they will botch up the process if forced to do it. The leaders of "The Dream team" have vindicated this warning and revealed their total logistical inability to make paradigm shifts by further relegating its occurrence to the state of a chance event they hoped would occur by itself if and when "The Initiative" succeeds, with no active effort on their part and botching up the ability of relativity, the most potent problem-solving concept in physics, into a "Catch 22" proposition, essentially castrating it in the process. This maneuver unquestionably relieved them of the onerous responsibility of having to say or do anything that could trigger an inquisition and ostracization by their peers and by conservative leaders of society but at the same time, it converted "The Initiative" into a "Catch 22" fiasco that has no chance of working and aborted the only chance of decisive success it had and condemned this country and this civilization to a premature demise that could possibly be postponed indefinitely.

5.7: THE SEVENTH STATEMENT WAS THE FIRST OF TWO STATEMENTS MADE BY PRESIDENT OBAMA AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF HIS "INITIATIVE," A JOKE THAT ADDED INSULT TO THE INJURY HE HAD INFLICTED ON ALL AMERICANS, THE COUNTRY AND THE CIVILIZATION BY HIS ACTIONS AND INACTIONS

THE STATEMENT: President Obama concluded the announcement of the implementation of his "Initiative" by jocularly making two statements. The first of these was that his "Initiative" might even give him "an explanation for some of the things that go on in Washington..."

PLAGIARIZED/DENIGRATED STATEMENT OF THE LETTERS"... was the statement that recognized "The Concept" of "The Letters" to be essentially "The Diagnosis" of "What ails Washington, (of EVERYTHING that is making our democratic governance and President Obama's Presidency sick to the point of being non-functional)" derived by a surgeon with thirty five years of experience in using the algorithm surgeons use routinely to diagnose and treat what is making their patients sick in life and death situations!

MY RESPONSE: This joke was an obvious "tongue-in-cheek" attempt by President Obama to ridicule and discredit, without mentioning or recognizing it, the factual statement made in "The Letters" just noted. This and the next remark, enabled President Obama to hint that his "Initiative" might do things that people would have otherwise ridiculed, by deflecting the sarcasm to concepts expressed in "The Letters" without mentioning them, recognizing them or crediting their authors for having conceived of these incredible ideas, people who have done and are doing incredible things with them like transplanting hearts, and those who developed GPS devices that enabled a man to go to the moon and return alive uneventfully. These two statements would have left the door open for President Obama to claim the credit for having implemented "The Initiative" if and when it worked, and made his dream come true. Unfortunately for President Obama, it is something that cannot ever happen logistically.

5.8: THE EIGHTH STATEMENT WAS THE SECOND OF TWO STATEMENTS MADE BY PRESIDENT OBAMA IN CONCLUSION OF HIS ANNOUNCEMENT OF "THE INITIATIVE."
THE STATEMNT...was the one that expressed his hope that "The Initiative" might even "prescribe something for it" (for what is going on in Washington).
THE PLAGIAIARIZED STATEMENT FOM "THE LETTERS:"... was the one that stated that "The Recommendations" of "The Letters" was "the something" prescribed for "what ails Washington," by a board certified surgeon using the algorithm surgeons use to make decisions and plans-of-action to deal with' "problems that seem insoluble"...in life-and-death situations.
MY RESPONSE: The second half of President Obama's joke was another tongue-in-cheek attempt at mocking the only scientific explanation available as to why he and Congress have become dysfunctional to the point of being non-functional and how we can all get together and resolve this problem. The facts he ridiculed were "no brainers," like the one that that he and Congress are in their current predicament and we are in ours, because we are all trying to solve "problems that seem insoluble" caused by the failure of "common sense and conventional wisdom" using the same "common sense and conventional wisdom" that failed and caused these problems in the first place, and that such problems can be solved easily by shifting gears and switching our paradigms of thought and action from those based on "common sense and conventional wisdom" to those based on relativity, the opposite of everything dictated by common sense and conventional wisdom, go "backwards one big step until such problems are solved before leaping forwards with renewed vigor. This is something we do all the time in physical situations (where we call it "thinking outside the box") but no one has thought of, recommended or taught us to do intellectually other than Einstein and the surgeons who did and do this instinctively and intuitionally as they did and do everything they have done and do, assisted by their algorithm.

COMMENT: I hate to say this but I have to confess that this inappropriate humor coming from a President of whom I had the highest hopes described in the third of "The Letters," conjured in my mind the image from history of the Roman Emperor who allegedly fiddled as Rome burned from his ineptitudes! I hope President Obama will do what it takes to erase this image from my memory and restore the old one I had of him and would like to cherish, upon receipt of this communication by doing what he should have done immediately upon getting elected.

5.9: THE NINTH STATEMENT, CHRONOLOGICALLY ONE OF HIS FIRST, MADE BY PRESIDENT OBAMA IN HIS FIRST TERM THAT REVEALED AWARENESS OF "THE CONCEPT" OF "THE LETTERS, HIS STATEMENT ON "JOINING THE DOTS."
THE STATEMENT: In January of 2010 after the underwear bomber had dodged detection and boarded the Detroit-bound plane at Amsterdam on Christmas day of 2009, President Obama made a statement that this event occurred because airport security personnel had "failed to join the dots!"

THE PLAGIARIZED STATEMENT OF "THE LETTERS"... was the one that spelled out the concept of "Coordinated Thinking" for solving "problems that seem to defy solution" in absolute detail for the President as the process of finding and joining all the dots one must find and join" required to solve it. "The Letters" had described the process as consisting of thinking using the mathematical principle of coordinate systems by asking and answering ten questions, considering the answer to each question as a dot on a map constructed around a frame of X,Y, and Z coordinates to outline the pathway one must take to find the best solution possible for that problem possible under the circumstances.

MY RESPONSE: It is uncanny that President Obama made this statement so soon after "The Letters" had been sent to him that had informed him how he could use ACTINEMAS and ASET as just described, the algorithms used by Einstein and others to solve "problems that seem insoluble," to solve problems like preventing terrorism, by finding and JOINING ALL THE DOTS they had to find and join. While it is entirely possible and plausible that the use of this common expression was a spontaneous product of his rhetoric and/or his ingenuity, it was unquestionably uncanny, that he chose these same specific terms to express his thoughts as were used in 'The Letters," to describe the same specific subject of preventing terrorism!

COMMENT: If President Obama had indeed been inspired by "The Letters" to make this statement, it was unfortunate that he did not take the opportunity to disclose the rest of the concept and describe precisely what he meant by his statement. He could have used the opportunity to "Implode Einstein's I-Bomb" and make the paradigm shift he should have made as "The Change" he promised to make upon getting elected two years earlier. He could have done this by telling everyone how Einstein solved such problems (that seem insoluble) in physics and surgeons do the same in surgery and how everyone can do it everywhere else and prevent such problems from occurring in the future. But then, he would have revealed the source of his thoughts and revealed the fact that he had not acted upon this concept that he had been given to him two years earlier and should have acted upon sooner and that he might have prevented this event from occurring in the first place had he done so.

If President Obama claims he did not receive these "Letters" containing this information, he must explain why he did not receive letters sent to the White House by registered mail, return receipt requested, and received there as evidenced by the signed and returned receipts, the legally accepted method of conveying information requiring action, short of issuing a subpoena. If he acknowledges receipt of "The Letters" but denies having read them, he needs to explain why he did not give letters sent to him by registered mail, return receipt requested, the attention they deserved and demanded. If he admits to having read "The Information" contained in "The Letters" he will have to explain why he did not act upon concepts they contained, concepts he considered worthy of quoting and recognizing as the cause for an undesirable international event that had just occurred and why he did not feel compelled to inform everyone how one could put this concept to work and prevent such problems from recurring in the future the way Einstein, surgeons and others have done in the past and continue to do at present. He must explain why he did not take this opportunity to set in motion the process of educating the nation on the existence of "problems that seem insoluble" and the art and science of solving them algorithmically by finding and joining the required dots! If he felt inadequate to deal with "The (scientific) Information" of "The Letters" and gave it to someone else he considered more qualified, he needs to disclose who they were and what their recommendations were. In addition, he needs to account for the fact that the next "Letter" sent to the White House after this event, on this subject, was signed by yours truly by calling himself "The I-Bomber" but it did nor elicit as much as a squeak from him or from White House Security!

5.10: THE TENTH STATEMENT, WAS IT THE DECLARATION OF THE INTENT TO PLAGIARIZE?
THE STATEMENT: At one of his earlier town hall meetings, I heard President Obama say something to the effect that he would not hesitate to use any idea from any source to solve the country's problems!
THE PLAGIARIZED STATEMNT: This statement did not plagiarize any statement from "The Letters," but it me wonder what he meant by it. Was President Obama laying down the foundation to use information without acknowledging its source or crediting its authors, something that would be tantamount to plagiarism and if so, was he planning to plagiarize "The Information" contained in "The Letters" and archived at my website?

MY RESPONSE: President Obama did not have to plagiarize any of the ideas expressed in "The Letters" because I had given him permission to use them PROVIDED HE ACKNOWLEDGED THEIR SOURCE AND GAVE CREDIT TO THEIR ORIGINAL AUTHORS INCLUDING EINSTEIN (to give it the weight only the accomplishments of a person of his stature could give it) and TO MY FATHER (WHO AUTHORED THE CONCEPT THAT THE PURSUIT OF PERFECTION CAN SOLVE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE IN EVERYDAY LIFE AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE) to give it the academic credibility because this book was the thesis that earned for his a Ph.D., from the University of Bombay (now Mumbai) and has been published in a conventionally accepted form in the past. As far as my contribution, the recognition of ACTINEMAS and ASET is concerned, I have no problem with my Commander-in-chief plagiarizing these ideas in the interests of my country even though common courtesy dictated that he must give credit where it is due and it would certainly be nice to be appreciated for forty five years of uncompensated hard work and being subjected to the mockery of "University Professors" who felt threatened by this concept. However, I cannot stand by and do nothing if it means denying the concept I had developed, the weight only a hundred years of the combined surgical experiences of hundreds of thousands of surgeons like myself that only I can give it because of an accident of fate that made me discover ACTINEMAS and ASET. I most certainly cannot stand by and do nothing if it means that my concept is going to be bastardized into a "catch 22" fiasco by "University Professors" who should have done what I have recommended President Obama must do now, a hundred and thirty years ago when Einstein discovered relativity but have failed to do so for the egotistical reasons mentioned earlier as the cause for their logistical inability to make paradigm shifts.

COMMENT: This remark from President Obama, in conjunction with my inability to get my concept on the need for a paradigm shift in the way we think and act in everyday life and democratic governance, based on an understanding of how the brain works as we think, published in journals of conventional wisdom, made me recognize my vulnerability to having my thoughts plagiarized and bastardized by those who have this ability. This fear made me register ACTINMAS as my trade mark for what it was worth. I did not patent it because I have no desire to patent something that I consider the equivalent of the wheel of the "Intellectual Universe of the Human Mind." My fears began to materialize with each of President Obama's subsequent statements, and were all but confirmed when President Obama and Prof. Newsome made the statements they made while announcing their "BRAIN-Mapping Initiative." I received further confirmation of my fears when Ms. Chun who pioneered "The BRAIN-Mapping Initiative" and Prof. Francis Collins who heads "The Dream Team," and Prof. Bargmann its principal co-chairperson, made comments that I shall deal with under the heading of "Circumstantial Evidence" in the next section.


5.11: THE ELEVENTH STATEMENT, ON HARNESSING THE EXECUTIVE POWER OF THE LAME DUCK PRESIDENT TO SOLVE "PROBLEMS THAT SEEM INSOLUBLE."
THE STATEMENT...was the one President Obama was overheard by ewe's dropping devices telling Russian President Putin that he planned to do things in his second term by executive action that he could not have done in his first term.

THE PLAGIARIZED STATEMENT... was the fundamental recommendation made to President Bush, that was given simultaneously to Candidate Obama, in the first of "The Letters" in which I had recommended to President Bush that he "initiate the process of making a constitutional amendment that would make bipartisanship mandatory in all democratic decision making processes for solving "problems that seem to defy solution'" (problems that seem insoluble), "The Fundamental Concept' of all "The Letters," BY EXECUTIVE ACTION DURING HIS "LAME DUCK" SESSION, because "he could do things then that he could not have done during his regular term."

RESPONSE: I had recommended to President Obama that this was the first thing he should have done upon assuming office or the next thing he did upon receiving any of the subsequent "Letters" if he wanted to succeed at anything he attempted. This recommendation was made to President Bush because a President can do things during the "lame duck" session that s/he could not have done during the regular term. It was given to him because it was scientifically the correct thing for him to do as the next thing he or his successor had to do to propel the country and its people from the time warp of the slow-moving horse and buggy days of Newtonian physics that worked on antiquated 'common sense and conventional wisdom" in which we are trapped, into the explosively progressive era of Einstein's digital-atomic age of today.

COMMENT: Instead of using executive privilege constructively in his second "lame duck" session, President Obama plans to use it to score brownie points with the electorate for his party. He plans to bypass the exercise of what is left of "due diligence" by Congress, to micromanage government and get pet projects legislated. If he does this, he will drive more nails into the coffin of democratic governance instead of resuscitating it by making the paradigm required shift now, in his lame duck session, that he should have made as the first thing he did on assuming office and abiding by the requirements of his oath of office. Had he done that, he would have made democratic governance functional in our digital atomic age. He was recently heard asking for recommendations as to what he could do by executive action next. The answer to that question is that he could do what he should have done as the first thing he did as recommended in "The Letters."

12. THE TWELVETH STATEMENT, PRESIDENT OBAMA'S FIRST ONE "ON THE NEED FOR MAKING A CHANGE IN WASHINGTON"
STATEMENT: Candidate Obama's election-winning promise "to make A CHANGE in Washington" if elected.

PLAGIARIZED STATEMENT, RESPONSE AND
COMMENT: I have no idea if Candidate Obama's election-winning promise to "Make a change in Washington" was in any way inspired or fuelled by "The Concept" of "The Letters" because the first of "the Letters" and a copy of the "Washington Post" advertisements were mailed to him around the time he started making that promise. If my first "Letter" was not the inspiration that made him make this promise and it was not a product of plagiarism but one of his own ingenuity or rhetoric, I hoped that subsequent "Letters" would help him add substance to his platitudes, a hope that remains to be realized!

6.0: THE EIGHT "LETTERS TO THE PRESIDENT" "The Information" allegedly plagiarized as his "Initiative" was conveyed to President Obama in eight "Letters to the President" that were mailed to him beginning in 2009 when he was still Candidate Obama and repeated seven more times over the next two years. All "The Letters" were sent by registered mail return receipt requested or other "track-able" forms of mail and the fact that they had been received by President Obama, was confirmed by the return of signed receipts and/or other forms of tracking, publication in newspapers and the mailing of clippings to him, and simultaneous electronic documentation by archival at my website at www.successateverything.com.
Here is the list of "The Letters," and a brief description of their contents that were plagiarized to become "The Initiative;"
6.1: The Letter To President Bush: A copy of this letter was the first of "The Letters." It was a copy of a letter I had sent to President Bush dated September 15, 2008, during his "lame duck session titled "Open Letter to President Bush and The Candidates on "How to Solve Problems That Seem to defy solution (the term I used to refer to what "The Dream Team" refers to as "problems that seem insoluble") such as Winning the War on Terror…etc…using ASET, The algorithm (originally formulated by me) for using Einstein's Philosophy …etc…" I published this letter originally in the Niagara Gazette as a paid advertisement, posted a transcript of it at www.successateverything.com/letter.php and mailed copies of it to President Bush, Candidate Obama and Candidate McCain. I have subsequently published a summary of this letter as a blog at www.successateverything.com/blog/63.

6.2: A Copy of "My Journey to ASET," an e-book I had published at my website. This book described the circumstances that led me to formulate the concept of ASET (an original contribution), the shortcut for using the concept of ACTINEMAS (also an original contribution) ACTINEMAS is the name I have given to the algorithm I had obtained by expressing as an algorithm, the steps Einstein had used to discover relativity. This book describes how I discovered the fact that ACTINEMAS is identical to the algorithm surgeons, all professional people, entrepreneurs, innovators and perfectionists use to do everything they have done in the past and continue to do at present. These documents together constituted a manual on how a sitting American President could orchestrate in America, the paradigm shift Einstein orchestrated in the world of physics, (based on an understanding of 'how the brain works as the mind thinks," to think most efficiently, an original concept developed by my father and I) and solve all the "problems that seem insoluble" confronting the nation, the world, and individuals. It was the first, original documentation of "The Concept" and "The Recommendations" that together constitute "The Information" contained "The Letters," concepts that I am accusing President Obama and his "Dream, Team" of plagiarizing and bastardizing into "The Initiative" that has no chance of ever working because the fundamental flaw of common sense and conventional wisdom has not been corrected but is preserved and propagated in and by it.

6.3: Open Letter To President Obama:' This third "Letter" was dated September 26, 2009. It was titled "Open Letter to President Obama". It was the first of "The Letters" that was addressed to President Obama after he had assumed office. I wrote it "to discharge my legal, moral and scientific obligation to my patients, to inform them and anyone who was about to do anything detrimental to their health, about the consequences of their actions." I had to send President Obama this letter at that time because he was about to do something detrimental to the health of every American patent and potential patient by reforming health care delivery in America using a method of governance that was malfunctioning to the point of being non-functional, "without making the constitutional amendment required to remedy this problem" and make the government functional again as described in "The Letters. I have posted a summary of this letter as a blog at www.successateverything.com/blog/87.

6.4: Open Letter To President Obama And All Americans" I wrote this letter to discharge my legal and moral obligation as an American surgeon to warn patients and potential patients when anyone was about to do anything detrimental to their health and what they could do about it. I mailed a copy of it to President Obama along with the second letter.

6.5. Einstein's I-Bomb:" The fifth "Letter to the President" was a transcript of a video clip entitled: "Einstein's I-Bomb," that I had posted on YouTube on October 27, 2009. This video was a verbal abstract of "The Letters to the President." I mailed a copy of its transcript to President Obama. Its purpose was to inform him about the You Tube video clip and invite him to view it and to visit my website and review all the information posted there, if he had not done so yet. I have posted this clip and its transcript at www.successateverything.com/einstein.php..

6.6: Undetected Breaches in White House Security:" The sixth "Letter to the President" was titled "Undetected breaches in White House Security" I wrote this letter to President Obama in January of 2010 after the "Underwear Bomber" incident following which President Obama said that this incident occurred because security personnel had "failed to join the dots." I wrote this letter to warn President Obama that there was a breach in (problem with) White house security that was preventing "Letters" containing information that could have helped him prevent such incidents from happening, that had been mailed to the White House, from receiving the attention they deserved. The information it contained has been described earlier as my response to President Obama's Statement No. 9 above, and I shall not repeat it here. I signed this letter as "The I-Bomber" since I was recommending that President Obama "implode "Einstein's Intellectual bomb" or "I-Bomb" in America," the term I had used to describe the process of rapidly disseminating "The Information" contained in "The Letters" in America and the implosion and removal of common sense and conventional wisdom from the minds of people as the only problem-solving tools they have and replacing them with the algorithms of ACTINEMAS (to replace conventional wisdom) and ASET (to replace common sense), as problem-solving tools to solve all problems to the best of their abilities. By signing this "Letter" as "The I-Bomber" I hoped, would elicit the explosive reaction from White House security and the President that it deserved but it did not elicit even a squeak from President Obama or White House security confirming my suspicion that letters sent by track-able forms of mail were not getting the attention they deserved, or were being intentionally ignored, even letters signed by people like "The I-Bomber." If President Obama claims that he did not receive those letters, he must explain why his staff did not draw his attention to letters sent to him in the legally required format of "registered mail, return receipt requested" that are only one step away from the serving of a subpoena, especially one written by "The I-Bomber!" If he acknowledge receiving them, he must explain why he did not give them the attention they deserved.

6.7: A Lesson To Be Learned From The Health Care Fiasco." The seventh letter was a copy of a letter to the Editor of the Niagara Gazette published on December 10, 2009 titled "A Lesson to be learned from the Health Care Fiasco" and posted as a blog at www.successateverything.com/blog/43. I wrote this letter in response to Congressman Harry Reid's remark as the health-care-delivery debate was raging in Washington, that a "lot of horse trading was going to occur" before anything could happen!" I wrote this "Letter" to make President Obama aware of this statement by a leading Congressman and use it as an opportunity to remind him of "The Information" I had given him in "The Letters" that he had still not conveyed to Congress and all Americans. It was the fact that reforming a problem like health care delivery is "a problem that seems to defy solution," one caused by the failure of "common sense (including horse trading tactics) and conventional wisdom" and attempts to solve such problems using "common sense (horse-trading methods) and conventional wisdom' that are not working will not only fail but eventually lead to the explosive destruction of everything involved.

• In addition, this "Letter" informed President Obama of the scientific reason why he had no choice but to make the recommended paradigm shift, the fact that "common sense (horse-trading tactics) and conventional wisdom" are not viable problem-solving methods in our current digital-atomic age. They work only under conditions that prevailed when our Constitution was written over two hundred years ago that were characterized by three factors; (a) Information travelled at relatively slower speeds compared to the speed of light such as those at which living carriers travel like the ponies of the Pony express, pigeons, and human bearers; (b) The volume of information our ancestors had to deal with any given time was relatively small; (c) mass destruction was not a possible outcome of undesirable decisions. As opposed to this, the conditions that prevail today are the opposite and "common sense (including horse-trading tactics) and conventional wisdom" will not work under these conditions. These conditions are characterized by the following three features that are the opposite of those that characterized olden days; (a) Information travels at the velocity of light, a speed at which common sense and conventional wisdom do not work and rules of relativity apply to what happens as proved by Einstein, thanks to the advent of the electronic transmission of information, (b) The mass of information we have to deal with has become astronomically large, and (c) Mass destruction could occur at a moment's notice from the slightest error in judgment while making decisions on how to solve problems. Our current conditions are those under which Einstein and those who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" have proved, will not work but their opposite, relativity in physics and thinking innovatively "outside the box" or thinking and doing the opposite of everything dictated by "common Sense and conventional wisdom are the only things that will work. It is easy to understand why "the opposite of common sense and conventional wisdom" (relativity) work when "common sense and conventional wisdom" stop working if one remembers the fact that these entities have stopped working because the conditions that prevail have changed and become the opposite of what they were when "common sense and conventional wisdom" were working! In fact, this is what "common sense and conventional wisdom" themselves recommend we do. The only reason why no one thought about this fact earlier is the fact that the hierarchy of "University Professors" on whom we rely for all information, have forbidden us from doing this from the beginning of time!


• The fundamental aim of this "Letter" was to remind President Obama of "The Information given to him in "The Letters" that the only way he and Congress were ever going to solve any of our digital-atomic age "problems that seem insoluble" like the problems of health care delivery, was going to be by his amending the constitution to reflect the needs precipitated by the changes that have occurred since the inception of The Constitution, by extending the paradigm shift Einstein made in theoretical physics to every day life and democratic governance.

• The simplest and only effective and enduring way anyone, of insuring that this change could be made across the board to everything, is going to be by the amendment of the Constitution to make bipartisanship mandatory in all democratic decision-making processes for solving "problems that seem insoluble" because bipartisanship is the method of extending the use of the principle of relativity to everyday life and democratic governance for reasons described fully in "The Letters."

6.8: "Obama Can earn Lot From The Falls!" The seventh "Letter" was mailed in April of 2010. It was the copy of a letter to the Editor published in the Niagara Gazette on April 3, 2010 that the editors titled "Obama Can Learn A Lot from the Falls". I have archived it as a blog at www.successateverything.com/blog/4. In this letter, I invited President Obama to visit Niagara Falls NY, and its hospital, the Memorial Medical Center, because the City and its Hospital were and still are living models of everything described in "The Letters." Memorial Medical Center was the place where "The Information" described in "The Letters" was recognized and developed into a working, duplicable concept described by the algorithms of ACTINEMAS and ASET. The concepts expressed in "The Letters were inspired by everything going on in this City, its Hospital, its highways that lead to nowhere, and the power of the Laws of Nature displayed by the beauty of Niagara Falls that can be harnessed to deliver us from the mess we are in today. President Obama ignored this invitation but he did visit a plant twenty miles away in neighboring Buffalo, an isolated island of success thriving on the principles of conventional wisdom in the midst of an ocean of failures of these principles. By focusing on "the exception to the rule that proves it," instead of the rule itself, President Obama squandered yet another opportunity to recognize and extend the secret of the success of that plant to the ocean of failures surrounding it and instead, exploited its success as a cheap propaganda stunt.

7.0: CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE OF PLAGIARISM, COVER UP AND BASTARDIZATION OF "THE INFORMATION" CONTAINED IN "THE LETTERS"

The five Leaders of President Obama's "Dream Team made five sets of statements after his announcement of his BRAIN Initiative. These statements together provide circumstantial evidence of all the allegations that have been made here that are as convincing, if not more convincing than the physical evidence already presented.

Here are the five sets of statements;

7.1: Two Statements made by Prof. Miyoung Chun Executive VP of The Kavli Foundation who "pioneered 'The Initiative'" for President Obama.

7.1 (a) THE FIRST STATEMENT made by Prof. Chun was non-verbal! It was the timing of her "pioneering effort" that launched "The Initiative" at the 2011 London Conference of Neuroscientists and nanotechnologists. This effort is a silent evidence of plagiarism because it came exactly two years after President Obama had received the first of "The Letters containing the allegedly plagiarized concepts and immediately after he had received the last one, and eighteen months before the President announced the "Initiative" that was a mirror-image opposite of the allegedly plagiarized "Information." This time frame gave President Obama enough time to realize that nothing he was doing was really working as predicted in "The Letters," and that things were not going to get any better until someone made the "paradigm shift in the country based on an understanding of how the brain works as the mind thinks as it solves problems," as "The Letters" had recommended he should have done. Since he felt inadequate to act upon a scientific concept such as this, by himself, as evidenced by his own admission while announcing the implementation of his "Initiative," and since the authors of "The Letters" and the concepts they described, including Einstein himself when he discovered relativity, were not "University Professors" on whom tradition demanded he rely upon for such matters, "due diligence" based on "common sense and conventional wisdom" dictated that he ask "University Professors of conventional wisdom and tradition" to evaluate "The Letters" and recommend what he should do with them. The time lapse gave these "Professors" just enough time to formulate a plan-of-action for the President and come up with "The Initiative." These facts taken together provide the first piece of convincing "circumstantial evidence" in favor of "The Allegations" made here.

7.1 (b) THE SECOND STATEMENT was made during an interview with BRAIN Project Pioneer Miyoung Chunin Technology News soon after the announcement of the Initiative by the President at which time she said: "The trickiest thing about the BRAIN mapping project might be that we don't even know what we are trying to learn!"

MY RESPONSE: Prof. Chun's statement, whereas it was a cute description of "The Initiative," unfortunately also revealed the fact that this "Initiative" was and is, essentially a "fishing expedition" hastily organized by a group of "University Professors," in an effort to solve a "problem that seemed insoluble," at the behest of their Commander-in-Chief who had obviously asked them to do something they had no idea how they were going to accomplish, and do it during his Presidency so that he may pass on as his legacy, a project as significant as, if not more significant than, the Human Genome Project!

COMMENT: The above fact taken in conjunction with the following facts that yours truly had just informed President Obama in "The Letters" provide highly suggestive evidence of plagiarism. These facts are; (i) that "The Letters" had informed President Obama that Einstein, surgeons and others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past had done so using an algorithm he had named ACTINEMAS, and (ii) that ACTINEMAS is also the algorithm that could enable anyone to determine what one was dealing with when one did not know what one was dealing with and (iii) that ACTINEMAS is also the algorithm that enables one to deal with matters one did not know how to deal with, (what questions to ask and how to answer them e.g., while determining what one was trying to learn). The fact that the aim of "The Initiative" as revealed by Prof. Chun's statement, was to determine how to do things "The Letters had informed President Obama how he could do them, without acknowledgement of the receipt of this information makes "The Initiative" to rediscover this information a covert attempt by the "Dream Team" to plagiarize for him the information that had already been given to him without acknowledgement of their receipt, recognition of their contents or crediting of their original authors, and that constitutes plagiarism by definition.

7.2 Statements Made By Doctor Arti Prabhakar;

Doctor Arti Prabakar Head of DARPA made three statements in her interview with Tom Kalil on You Tube soon after the announcement of the "Initiative" by President Obama that described what she hoped "The BRAIN Initiative" would do for DARPA. The fact that her expectations were identical to the expectations given to President Obama as ones he could hope for by implementing "The Concept and "The Recommendations" of "The Letters" provides the next set of three pieces of circumstantial evidence of plagiarism of "The Concepts" and "The Expectations" of "The Letters."

Whereas it is entirely possible that Doctor Prabhakar came up with these expectations by herself without prompting from anyone else, it still will be a highly uncanny coincidence that her expectations were identical to those given to President Obama in "The Letters," just before she made these statements.

If Prof. Prabhakar reveals the precise sequence of events that led her to entertain these expectations at this specific time, expectations "conventional wisdom" would not have encouraged her to entertain, I shall be more than happy to drop the charges of plagiarism against her. If she cannot do this independent of the concepts expressed in "The Letters," it would constitute viable circumstantial evidence of her complicity in the cover-up of plagiarism and this information.


7.2 (a) PROF. PRABHAKAR'S FIRST STATEMENT was that DARPA was interested in "understanding how all of us learn, assess and gather new information...

MY RESPONSE: President Obama had been informed in "The Letters," on eight occasions beginning four years earlier and ending two years before Prof. Prabhakar expressed her expectations, that Einstein and all those who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" had done so by obtaining (gathering) information from the environment that seemed impossible to obtain, processing (assessing) it and using this new information no one even knew existed, the kind of information Prof. Prabhakar hopes to get from "The Initiative," to do all the remarkable things they have done. If Dr. Prabhakar was privy to this information contained in "The Letters" and did not acknowledge this fact, she would become a party to the act of plagiarism and the subsequent cover-up that followed.

COMMENT: In "The Letters" I have described exactly what made me think each thought I had thought, why I said each thing I had said and why and how I did each thing I did. I credited everyone whose ideas I had used and apologized in anticipation to anyone whose ideas I may have unknowingly used without acknowledgment. If President Obama, Prof. Collins, Prof. Prabhakar and the other leaders of "The Dream Team" can likewise tell me honestly what made them think each thought they say they have thought, why they said each thing they have said why and how they did each thing they said they have done or plan to do, vis-à-vis the BRAIN Initiative, and prove to me that the statements I have made and the concepts I had described in "The Letters" had nothing to do with their thoughts, actions and plans vis-à-vis "The Initiative," I shall drop my charges of plagiarism. However, I cannot drop the charges that the "Dream Team" has bastardized the concept of relativity as it applies to everyday life and relativity and made it a "catch 22" proposition, because it is a fact of life and will remain so unless the "Dream Team" can do the logistically impossible task of giving me a single reason to justify their contention that something that has stopped working like "common sense and conventional wisdom" will work for them for no good reason under the "prevailing circumstances" By "prevailing circumstances" I mean the environment in which information is travelling at the velocity of light and computer science is dumping monumentally overwhelming amounts of information on everyone every second of every day, and explosive failure of everything threatens everything we do, no one has any idea of what to do or agree upon anything in spite of all the information we have, circumstances under which Einstein and everyone who has solved problems that seem insoluble has proved that "common sense and conventional wisdom do not work and the rules of relativity are the only ones that apply. To convince me that they have a point, the "Dream Team" must disprove Einstein's theory of relativity and offer another explanation based on "Conventional wisdom" for all the phenomena that constitute "relativity" that is different from the one I have posted at my web site, the explanation "University Professors of physics and Editors of Journals of conventional wisdom" refuse to accept or publish, even though they cannot offer a single argument in rebuttal other than the ludicrous ones enumerated earlier, and have forced me to publish it at my website.

7.3 (b) PROF PRABHAKAR'S SECOND STATEMENT expressed her hope that the "Initiative" would be able to "build a theoretical model...of brain function as we go... " that would help DARPA in its endeavors...

MY RESPONSE: President Obama had been given the "theoretical model" Prof. Prabhakar's is hoping BRAIN would give her, years before she started hoping for it!

COMMENT: The theoretical model Prof. Prabhakar desires is hoping the "Dream team" will develop for her, was developed and described for President Obama in "The Letters," that informed him that we can best understand brain and mind function by performing thought experiments enabled by taking the steps of ACTINEMAS and creating a theoretical model (hologram) in our minds as to how the brain and mind work based on a recognition of the fact that intellectual transmission occurs beyond brain cells and between them wirelessly via "thought waves" that are similar to electromagnetic waves, with the difference that they are undetectable to all means of detection available to us at this time except our minds, making brain and mind function the biological domain of relativity, a world in which the rules of relativity apply and alternate with Newton's Laws of motion depending on the velocity with which thoughts and information are travelling viz., the velocity of electromagnetic transmission, or everyday life velocities respectively. This makes it important for every man, woman and child to understand the fundamentals of relativity before they can understand how their brains and minds function as they think or use them deliberately as computers to help them think and act with maximum efficiency as they live their lives.

"The Letters" had further described for President Obama how these "thought waves reverberate back and forth within the skull enabling communication between brain cells, linking and unifying all of them with one another and with all brain and mind centers, forming multi-dimensional holograms of the external universe that evolve with time, within the "space" inside their heads that constitutes "the Intellectual Universe of the Human Mind" and providing us with an intellectual model our universe and our brain and mind function. This phenomenon results in comprehension of the external universe as it exists at a given point in time and enables people to make the "best" plans-of-action, those that have the greatest chance of success, under a given set of circumstances (at a given point in time).

7. 2 (c) PROF. PRABHAKAR'S THIRD STATEMENT expressed the desire to be able to translate "scientific discoveries" into practical ways of improving lives, those of "wounded warriors" and the public in general.

MY RESPONSE: This statement of Prof. Prabhakar's summarized the ultimate goal of "The Letters" that had been described for President Obama a few years earlier far more succinctly than I had done in my verbose style that includes all details! The goal of "The Letters" was summarized for President Obama in my style to be to enable him, Congress and every man, woman and child living, not just in America, but on this planet, to translate and use all scientific discoveries and laws from Galileo's principle of relativity to Newton's laws of motion and Einstein's Theory of relativity, and everything in between and beyond, and put them to work every time anyone did anything in everyday life, enabling everyone, citizens and wounded warriors, "to do their best" every time they thought about anything or did anything to succeed at everything at which success is humanly possible to accomplish, and to do all this algorithmically by simply taking the steps of ACTINEMAS and ASET instead of using conventional wisdom and common sense. An algorithm is by definition, a sequence of steps anyone could take that would enable every one to accomplish goals that would otherwise require knowledge, training, experience, and capabilities that can be acquired only by possession of extensive knowledge, training and experience, without possessing any of these attributes, just by adhering to the steps of the algorithm faithfully (the way we abide by the rules of common sense, conventional wisdom, religion and our other beliefs today). The difference between these two sets of entities is that the common sense and conventional wisdom stop working when we are dealing with high velocities and large quantities whereas, the ACTINEMAS and ASET go on working under all circumstances to enable success whenever it is humanly possible to succeed.

COMMENT: "The Letters" had informed President Obama that all he had to do, to accomplish what Prof. Prabhakar is dreaming about was to "Implode Einstein's Intellectual Bomb or "I-Bomb" in America" and inform everyone rapidly repeatedly and with maximum efficiency, what Einstein had done, why and how he did it, and why and how everyone can and must duplicate what he had done in physics, in everyday life and democratic governance using the simple set of steps outlined in "The Letters." This would orchestrate the paradigm shift in America that would replace the use conventional wisdom and common sense with the algorithms of ACTINEMAS and ASET respectively. These algorithms are essentially "common sense and conventional wisdom" piggybacked on relativity so that they take over from each another as each of them fails. Therefore, if Prof. Prabhakar wants her dreams and desires to come true, she should reveal how she acquired these desires and dreams and beg, not simply request, President Obama to "implode Einstein's I-Bomb" in America and orchestrate the required paradigm shift before his term ends and not be his accomplice in wasting enormous amounts of time and resources on a "catch 22" proposition that has no chance of success.

7.3 Statements made by Prof. Francis Collins.

These statements were made by Prof. Collins duringinterview with Tom Kalil on You Tube.

7.3 (a): STATEMENT NO.1. In this statement, Prof. Collins said that one of the aims of this "Initiative was "to use new technologies to learn THE LANGUAGE OF THE BRAIN..."

MY RESPONSE: This statement is a blatant declaration by Prof. Collins' of his intent to plagiarize verbatim, one of the fundamental concepts given to President Obama in "The Letters," the concept that the algorithm I had named ACTINEMAS that Einstein, surgeons and others have used and use to solve "problems that seem insoluble" is the algorithmic "LANGUAGE" the human brain, mind and body use for all their communication needs.


COMMENT: "The Letters" had informed President Obama that all the people who have ever solved "problems that seem insoluble" had done so by inventing, reinventing, discovering and using ACTINEMAS as the language they used to communicate with their brains and their minds, to use them as computers by programming them to work as intellectual GPS devices, engage in "Coordinated Thinking," thinking aided by the mathematics of coordinate systems, to find and navigate intellectual pathways they had to take to discover the information needed to do the incredible things they have done. President Obama had been informed in "The Letters" how the mind, brain and body accomplish these ends by using the answers to the ten questions of ACTINEMAS like ten letters of the alphabet of the algorithmic language the brain, mind and body use to communicate with one another. The brain and the mind use this language to help us gather information from our environment with our sense organs, transmit it as impulses via the neurons to the brain cells, and thence to the mind by wireless electromagnetic transmission, for further processing that enables comprehension, storage in memory banks, and formulation of plans-of-action to deal with the source of the stimulus that initiated the process. These processes are also done using ACINEAS and by continued coordinated thinking (thinking using the laws and principles that make coordinate systems work). This enables people to think, understand, remember and make plans of action to react to things going on in the world in which they live. Any attempt to reinvent this concept by any one to whom this concept had been given earlier, like President Obama, or by people authorized by such an individual to do this for him (like the leaders of the "Dream Team), constitutes plagiarism by definition. The plagiarism would be intentional if President Obama had informed Prof. Collins of "The Letters" but unintentional on the part of Prof. Collins if the President had not informed him about them. In either case, it will be still be intentional on the part of President Obama and it will become so on Professor Collins' part upon receipt of this notification, if he persists in this endeavor without recognition of the fact that this information exists and without crediting the original authors of the concepts involved. If he wants to avoid being accused of plagiarism, Prof. Collins must acknowledge the unintentional nature of his actions if he can, acknowledge the fact that the information he is trying to reinvent and rediscover exists having been invented and discovered, described, perfected and used by Einstein and the others listed many times here, and recognize and credits the original authors and their work before taking another step.
Regarding Prof. Collins' statement that he hopes to discover the language of the human mind using "new technologies," all I can say is that the chances are nil that he and his "Dream Team" will ever learn the language of the mind using any form of physical technology new or old, no matter how sophisticated, because the language of the mind, like the mind itself, is not a physical entity. It cannot be perceived, detected, investigated, comprehended or manipulated, by any direct physical means whatsoever, just like electromagnetism and gravity. It is an intellectual entity that exists only in the minds of people who have learned and understood it from past experience and deduction. There is only one way this language can be detected, discovered, studied, learned and understood. That is by doing what Einstein had done, described and recommended, by using our minds as organs of perception and as instruments, to do things we cannot do using our physical organs and instruments, and performing thought experimentation the way Einstein had described it. This was the method described for President Obama in "The Letters." The remaining details of how Einstein used his method or surgeons use theirs, can be learned only by doing what Einstein said we must do when he said ..."if one wants to learn anything about the methods a theoretical physicist uses ( I would add, the surgeon uses), one should not listen to his words but look at his (or her) actions." These were the methods used by yours truly to derive ACTINEMAS when it was immediately appreciated and discovered to be the language of biology used by surgeons to interrogate everything they want to interrogate everything they had to learn about and do as they practiced surgery. President Obama was also informed that the steps of this algorithm are so easy to learn that a child or anyone who is not intellectually challenged, can be taught and learn to use, to think like a genius and act with the diligence of a surgeon without being either. It is an algorithmic language that works by enabling those who abide by its requirements, to abide by all the laws of nature including the rules of relativity as they apply to real life situations and to harness their powers to do every thing that is humanly possible to achieve, the way algorithms are expected to do!"

7.3 (b): THE SECOND STATEMENT made by Prof. Collins described the second goal of the "Initiative" to be to "LEARN HOW THINGS HAPPEN AT THE SPEED OF THOUGHT."

MY RESPONSE: This statement is in effect, another blatant, intentional or unintentional attempt at plagiarization of the concepts and the statements of "The Letters" that appraised President Obama years before Prof. Collins thought about what happens at the speed of thought, that there is such a thing as the "speed with which we think" and the relationship between this speed and the speed with which information travels, that affects every aspect of everything we think about and do. The concept of what happens at the sped of thought did not exist in the repertoire of University Professors until Prof. Collins made this statement.

COMMENT: "The Letters" had informed President Obama that the only way we can discover and learn everything we need to know about thoughts and thinking is by performing thought experiments using ACTINEMAS the way Einstein studied relativity. In addition, he had been given all the information he needed to know about the speed at which we think vis-à-vis the speed at which information travels, why we must and how we could learn to think at the speed of light simply by "Imploding Einstein's I-Bomb" in our minds and making a paradigm shift in the way we think by replacing the use of "common sense and conventional wisdom" with the use of ACINEMAS and ASET that will reprogram our minds, maximize our ability and efficiency to think and enable us to think at the speed of light if not faster, as needed to survive, thrive and excel in our digital atomic age.

Therefore, if Prof. Collins is serious about learning "what happens at the sped of thought," the first step he must take is to make the paradigm shift recommended in "The Letters" in the way he thinks and acts, by "Imploding Einstein's I-Bomb" in his own mind the way Einstein did in his, and replace his old paradigm of thought and action based on "conventional wisdom and common sense" with a new one based on ACTINEMAS and ASET, a step that will boost the speed with which he can think form "The speed of thought" to which he is a slave at present as evidenced by his own statement to thinking at the speed of light or even faster on demand. He will also acquire the ability to perform thoughts experiments the way Einstein performed them and then he will be all set to learn and understand how his mind and brain function as he thinks because unknown to him, the speed with which his mind functions is the speed of light, the speed at which thought waves weave brain cells together in their imperceptible "Intellectual web. He will also be able enhance his speed of thinking to greater speeds by learning intellectual forecasting the way Einstein predicted the immediate future of physics and described in "The Letters." If he does these things, I can tell him from my personal experience, he will have to face the wrath of traditionalists from his hierarchy of "University Professors" and others who will want to subject him to an inquisition for commission of heresy and ostracize him and the only way he will be able to get out or better still, prevent this predicament will be by bursting the "catch 22" bubble of President Obama's "BRAIN" and requesting him to recue him from his predicament by orchestrating for him the paradigm shift the President wanted his "dream Team" to catalyze and implode Einstein's I-Bomb in the worlds of everyday life, science and democracy, by executive action as he was advised to do in the first place in "The Letters," make ostracization obsolete and replace it with remedial procedures.
This will end the vicious cycle President Obama had set in motion by ignoring "The Letters" and their "Recommendations" and reverse the tail spin we are in and launch the country into the digital-atomic age with a bang. If Prof. Collins cannot or will not do this, and decides to adhere to his guns and his original plan, he will have to answer he the charges of plagiarization.


7.3 (d): THE THIRD STATEMENT made by Prof. Collins cautioned against entertaining high expectations from "The Initiative" and warned that it was "not going to be an overnight sensation" and... it will require...quite a few years" for it to accomplish anything.

MY RESPONSE: This statement confirms the validity of "The Warning" given to President Obama four years before Prof. Collins even thought of making this statement. President Obama had been warned in "The Letters" about the logistical inability of "University Professors" like Prof. Collins to make paradigm shifts because they require saying and doing things contrary to everything these pundits have professed practiced and preached forever. This is the fundamental reason why President Obama was advised to initiate the making of this paradigm shift by himself and by an executive act, something he could have initiated at a moment's notice and completed shortly thereafter in Congress. He was advised to do this outside the domain of "University Professors" where, from personal experience, I could have told him it was not going to happen in the five to ten years the "Dream Team" was hoping it world catalyze itself. University professors did not make it happen in the hundred and fifty years since Einstein discovered relativity and precipitated the need for making it in everyday life and it will not happen at any time in the foreseeable future, or even in our lifetime if we depend on them to make it. It will not happen as long as Prof. Collins and his hierarchy of "University Professors" continue to ignore the fact that all their endeavors based on conventional wisdom and common sense are ending in failures, recognize the fact that relativity works in such situations, pocket their egos and do what needs to be done in the greater interests of our survival on this planet as a civilization. Now we have Prof. Collins caught between a rock and a hard place and it remains to be seen how he is going to handle this situation.

COMMENT: We need a paradigm shift urgently to solve "problems that seem insoluble" that are proliferating rapidly with each passing moment here and abroad and essentially "making us burst at our seams" and self-destruct. We need to reverse our inability to teach children how to learn, solve their problems most efficiently and succeed in our digital atomic age. We need to create an environment in which they will develop into intellectual superstars, not failures, not junkies, criminals, murderers and terrorists. We need to implode the world of the past in which success has become impossible for everyone other than the gifted and the fortunate, and the most industrious and gift each child with what it takes for everyone to succeed and excel at living ones life as model citizens of the world of the future. We have to learn how to survive on this planet indefinitely before we try to colonize another one as Prof. Hawking and others "University Professors" suggest we do, instead of teaching us how to live our lives most efficiently on earth before we try to colonize another planet. Towards this end in addition, we need to prevent our basic institutions like housing, banking, employment, maintenance of infrastructure and energy and food supplies from crumbling by making our "problems that seem insoluble" crumble instead.

"The BRAIN Initiative" may help make small advances in the diagnosis and treatment of organic brain disease and create a lot of temporary jobs but I have no hesitation in predicting that it will contribute absolutely nothing towards understanding how the brain functions as the mind thinks, towards the solution of "problems that seem insoluble" or catalyze the paradigm shift the "Dream Team" is dreaming it will catalyze. The only way the "BRAIN Initiative" will make a paradigm shift happen is if its leaders recognize the futility of this Initiative sooner than later, acknowledge the fact that required information already exists, admit their inability to make paradigm shifts required to make relativity universal in its application and request President Obama to crack the code of the human mind and release its full potential the way Einstein asked President Roosevelt to crack the atom and release its equally full physical potential and ask him to do it as recommended in "The Letters" as the last thing he does as President and. Then, and only then, will he prove that he has the greatness in him that "The Letters" recognized he has, and accomplish something worth his while to pass on as his legacy, instead of vacillating and squandering his last opportunity to do something worthwhile the way he seems to be content doing.

7.3 (e): THE FOURTH STATEMENT OF PROF. COLLINS was non-verbal. By agreeing to direct the BRAIN Initiative and not questioning President Obama's contention that this "Initiative" is as significant as, if not more significant that the Human Genome Project, Prof. Collins silently agreed with this statement of the President. As soon as I recognized ACTINEMAS, I realized that it was to thinking the code of intellectual transmission the way the genetic code was to the human Genome project, the language of genetic transmission, but I did not say so because I felt it was not for me to say it but for someone like Prof. Collins to do it for me. Even though he has not said so in as many words, Prof. Collins has agreed in spirit to the fact that "understanding how the brain works as the mind thinks," is as important as the Human Genome Project.


7. 4 Statements made By Prof. Newsome

7.4 (a): STATEMENTS MADE BY PROF. NEWSOME AT THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF "THE INITIATIVE" have already been dealt with earlier.

7.4 (b) STATEMENTS MADE BY PROF. NEWSOME AFTER THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF "THE INITIATIVE:" Prof. Newsome made one statement to Reuters as reported in the article titled "To Crack Human Brain's Code, a Search for Visionaries" in Business and Financial News dated April 7, 2013, after the announcement of "The Initiative" by President Obama, that revealed Prof. Newsome's real feelings about "The Initiative." He said: "I don't need this aggravation to some extent, but I think this is really important...!"

MY RESPONSE: This statement taken in conjunction with his earlier statements that the "Dream Team" did not have any of the paraphernalia its leaders thought they needed to implement this "Initiative," and that the only thing they were sure of was the fact that they were "out to catalyze a paradigm shift!" suggest that the "Dream Team" agreed to undertake this mission they considered "an aggravation they did not need," want, or do anything about, at the behest of an authority they could not refuse. They did not agree to make an attempt at making this paradigm shift, because "the time was right for this to happen" as stated by some of them, for three reasons, (i) this "right time" came and went long ago, (ii) everything required for making this shift has been available all along, and (iii) none of the things they are waiting for, can happen logistically or help them in any way.

COMMENT: There is only one authority in America that no American can refuse, and that is the authority of the Commander-in-Chief. In this case, everything points to the fact that this directive came from President Obama as a request-cum-order-cum-enticement with a hundred plus million dollar government grant "to make" for him "the paradigm shift" that "The Letters" had convinced him, someone had to make to turn the country around. Prof. Newsome's statement provides convincing circumstantial evidence in support of "The Allegations" that the "University Professors" heading the "Dream team" agreed to do something they did not really want to do and could not logistically do, something they could not logistically refuse or afford to refuse, for administrative and fiduciary reasons rather than from the goodness of their hearts or because "the time was right!"

If Prof. Newsome believes that the objective of "The Initiative" is "really important," he should do what is "really the right thing to do" upon receipt of this communication. He must first expose "The Initiative" for what it is, a plagiarized bastardized "catch 22" proposition, that has no chance of accomplishing any of its objectives. Then, he must acknowledge the fact that the objectives of "The Initiative" have already been accomplished many times, by many people, and help make the real paradigm shift based on this information as recommended here and in "The Letters." Or, he must refute what has been said here and in "The Letters" and offer an alternate course of action that he can prove is better. He cannot sit back and let current events run their course and do nothing hoping that everything will fall into place passively, because "it just ain't gonna happen." The remaining two options are the only ones he has, now that he has committed himself to "catalyzing a paradigm shift" that is not going to be catalyzed, and to "doing the right thing" as revealed by his statements and by his actions.


7.5 Statements Made by Prof. Cori Bargmann

Prof. Bargmann, Co Chair of the BRAIN Initiative, made the following statements that provide circumstantial evidence of plagiarism and attempts to cover up this fact and the fact that "The Initiative" is a "catch 22" variant of "The Concept" and "The Recommendations" of "The Letters" that has no chance of ever working.

7.5 (a): STATEMENT NO. 1: Prof. Bargmann's first statement providing circumstantial evidence of plagiarism was the one she made to "Business and Financial News" that led them to believe that the objective of "The BRAIN Initiative" was "To crack the code of the human brain...",

RESPONSE: This vision implies a blatant, overt or covert intent to plagiarize "the concept" given to President Obama in "The Letters," four years before he had appointed her and the leaders of the "Dream Team" and authorized this "Initiative." That concept was that "the code" Prof. Bargmann is seeking "to crack" had already been cracked by Einstein, being "the secret (code) of his success," and by all the others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past being the secrets (codes) of all their successes as well.

COMMENT: I had informed President Obama in "The Letters" that Einstein, surgeons, professional people and all the others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past had determined "how the human mind works as we think" and thereby, had "cracked its code."

In addition, he had been informed on eight separate occasions that this information (code) has been archived at www.successateverything.com as, ACTINEMAS "the algorithmic key to the intellectual universe of the human mind," the same as saying that it is the protocol for "cracking the code of the human brain and mind," opening it up, allowing intellectual entry, interrogation and exploration, establishment of control and manipulation of ones own normal mind as it functions, maximizing its efficiency and releasing its full potential and making it go as far as it is humanly possible to go.

For the reasons just mentioned, Prof. Bargmann's statement represents an intentional act of plagiarism if President Obama had informed her about "The Letters" and an unintentional act of plagiarism if he had not informed her but it will become intentional If she persists in this endeavor after receipt of this information without acknowledging the fact that this information already exists and credits its original authors. In either event, it is uncanny how similar Prof. Bargmann's language is the language used to describe "The Concept" of "the Letters" to President Obama who sponsored this "Initiative" a few years earlier.

After receipt of this information, if Prof. Bargmann does not credit Einstein for discovering this code and using it to discover relativity and telling us how he did it, my father for discovering the fact that "problems that seem insoluble" can be solved by "the pursuit of perfection" while attempting to solve them, yours truly for expressing the steps Einstein had taken as an algorithm and recognizing the fact that this algorithm is identical for all practical purposes to the medical-surgical-diagnostic-cum-therapeutic-protocol (code of conduct or algorithm) doctors use to diagnose and treat patients, and all its other original authors, this "Initiative will have to be considered an intentional act of plagiarism unless she can provide evidence-based arguments to refute all the evidence-based facts that have been presented and will be presented here.

(b) In the same interview as above, Prof. Bargmann said "...before BRAIN tries to solve a single mystery of the human mind, it will build THE SCIENTIFIC INFRASTRUCTURE to be able to ask the right questions."

MY RESPONSE: Once again, President Obama had been informed in "The Letters" that this "scientific infrastructure" required to enable one "to ask the right questions" one must ask and how to answer them, to solve any mystery (problem that seems insoluble") including those of the human mind, is ACTINEMAS, the algorithm Einstein and all the others who have solved the mystery of the human mind and used this information to solve all "problems that seem insoluble" in the past and surgeons and others continue to use on a daily basis. This algorithm had been recognized, defined and given to President Obama along with instructions on how to use them, long before he authorized this "Initiative." Therefore, this statement is yet another blatant declaration of overt or covert intent to plagiarize information given to President Obama, the person who authorized it. It will be intentional as stated before if President Obama had disclosed this information and unintentional if he had not done so but it will become intentional once Prof. Bargmann receives this information.

COMMENT: Einstein and the surgeons and all others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" have defined this "scientific infrastructure" for solving mysteries to be ACTINEMAS, the algorithm that prompted them and continues to prompt them "to ask and answer all the right questions" (ten of them) and insures that they have answered all of them the way they must be asked and answered, every time they do anything while solving any mystery ("problem that seems insoluble") that is amenable to human solution. ACTINEMAS has been proven to work by Einstein who used it to solve one of the greatest mysteries of theoretical physics and of all time. Its prowess has been confirmed by all the others who have solved all the remaining mysteries ("problems that seem insoluble") that they have solved and continue to solve and will go on solving. It would be the tragedy of all tragedies if the Prof. Bargmann and her "Dream Team" spends the next ten years and hundreds of millions of dollars, in trying to reinvent this "wheel of thought" that already exists, one that was given to President Obama for dissemination to the "seven billion people" Prof. Collins recognized as inhabiting this planet and needing this information to survive and live their lives more effectively by solving personal and public "problems that seem insoluble" that are making life on earth unlivable for many. These problems are proliferating at an alarming rate, making life a nightmare for many, and threatening to make "the American Dream" an American nightmare of gargantuan proportions. It has our civilization reeling in a tail-spin to oblivion, that we can and must reverse while it is still possible. This is not going to happen unless "University Professors" like Prof. Bargmann and the Leaders of "The Dream Team" pocket their egos and orchestrate the paradigm shift in "the way they think," that caused this problem in the first place, and recognize the significance and power of "the opposite of (way of thinking about" everything" they have professed and preached their entire lives (relativity as it applies to everything else other than physics), as the only factor and force that will work for solving problems that cannot be solved any other way (using the conventional methods they have continued to advocate even after they have stopped working). They must act now along lines recommended by a "Non-University Non-Professor," (who is unfortunately not the "young Turk" Prof. Bargmann is dreaming will rescue her from her predicaments, but a decrepit old Indian surgeon who was a "young Turk" when he started thinking about this problem but became old and decrepit because no "University Professor" would listen to him!), remembering the fact that Einstein was a Non-University Non-Professor, a college drop-out and a postal clerk when he made the mother of all paradigm shifts and made the world what it is today. He would not have been able to do what he did, had he been a "University Professor" at that time. They must not wait for the ten years they anticipate it will take for their current experiment to succeed for three reasons. (a) First and foremost, this experiment has no logistical chance of ever succeeding, a prediction on which I am willing to wager anything; (b) In ten years, it may be too late to remedy the situation; and (c) Most importantly, it is something that they must get done now, when President Obama, the only person who has the executive power to "go on a war footing" in his lame duck days and do what he should have done as the first thing he did but did not do, viz., initiate the process of making the required paradigm shift in the way we think as we solve problems described in "The Letters." President Obama has recognized the need for this paradigm shift, has committed himself to doing something about it even though it was not the way he should have done it, has admitted his inability to do it himself and has sought their help. They must help him make this shift in the way we think in the next few months left while President Obama is still President, and not squander this opportunity for egotistical reasons or exploit it for their own gain because we may not get a second chance to salvage ourselves. If the "Dream Team" squanders this opportunity and fails in its endeavor, neither our next President nor the American Public are ever going to believe anything they may have to say after they have failed. In the mean time, I am going to hold President Obama and each one of the leaders of the "Dream Team" personally responsible for each and every random act of violence that kills or maims children and innocent people in this country and abroad, caused by the unbridled proliferation "problems that seem insoluble" everywhere in the world for having baulked at initiating the process that could have prevented or at least mitigated it and recommend that every American do the same until they act upon this proposition!


(c) In the article titled "Cori Bargmann Has BRAINs on her Mind", Prof. Bargmann attempts to explain "intermediate scale" or central core of "The Initiative" by comparing it to "trying to understand how a hospital works by following one random person around." She goes on to elaborate and say; "If we followed only the receptionist, we'd get a very distorted view of what happens there. A view of the hospital's lights from an airplane won't help us much either. We need to follow enough people to see the ways doctors, patients, staff and visitors interact with each other."

MY RESPONSE: I consider this statement to be incontrovertible circumstantial evidence of the fact that Prof. Bargmann is aware of at least one of "The Letters," the eighth one, and that this statement is an attempt to denigrate and ridicule it for President Obama unless and until she can prove otherwise with evidence based arguments. The eighth of "The Letters" was the one in which yours truly had had the audacity to invite President Obama to visit his little hospital out in the boonedocks of America on the Niagara Frontier, and to provide pseudo-scientific justification for President Obama's ignoring of this invitation, without mentioning this fact because it would make "The Initiative" ipso facto, an act of plagiarism and a cover up unless proved otherwise by Prof. Bargmann with evidence based statements as to how she physically formulated each of the ideas she had disclosed so far and will develop or disclose in the future. A "pseudo-scientific fact" is an argument advanced by a "University Professor" that is not based on an established scientific fact or accepted theory that has as its only redeeming feature, the fact that it was a pronouncement made by a "University Professor of conventional wisdom working out of an Ivory Tower of Tradition."

COMMENT: I extended the invitation in question in "Letter" No. 8, to President Obama, not to have him follow the receptionist of my hospital around. I invited him to allow a board-certified general-vascular-trauma surgeon with thirty years of experience in solving "problems that seem insoluble" on a routine basis 24/7 in little hospitals in the boonedocks, where theories originating in ivory towers like Harvard and Rockefeller and pieces of legislation like "Obamacare" eventually fail when they collide head-on with the realities of everyday-life and relativity as it applies to everyday life situations. Such "collisions" force people like surgeons to do unconventional things that are the only methods that work under such circumstances. In my case, they were things I could not have said or done, like the things I have described here, things that would initiate an inquisition and end in my ostracization if I were a Professor of surgery or physics at Harvard or Princeton, things like "thinking outside the box" (relativity as it applies to everyday life) just to survive and enabling academicians and politicians to claim credit for successes they do not deserve. I wanted to give President Obama a first hand opportunity to see, hear, feel and understand (the four steps of ASET) the algorithm for using the information I had given him in "The Letters." I wanted him to appreciate how the brain of a surgeon works while solving problem after problem that seems insoluble" in the practice of Medicine, works in the ER'S and the OR's of America and the world. The best way I can conceptualize such a person is by comparing her/him to an "Intellectual version of Rambo," whose mind works like an intellectual assault rife that fires bullet after conceptual bullet structured on ACTINEMAS and ASET that, unlike real bullets that destroy and kill randomly, act like guided missiles of concepts that always find their mark and do not explode and destroy, but implode and repair.

Come to think about it, I cannot honestly blame President Obama for not visiting my little hospital on the outskirts of America! In his 'heart of hearts he knew that, had he done so, he would have realized that the "Obamacare" he had just enforced the enaction of, was (and still is) a train wreck waiting to happen when it hits the playing fields where Americans, their surgeons and all hard working professionals live their everyday lives and fight, win and loose the battles of life, death and happiness.

Prof. Bargmann hit the nail on the head a second time when she said that one (like President Obama) could not have learned how a hospital works by looking at its lights from a plane (like Air Force 1), because it is a better analogy than anything I could think of to illustrate all the fundamental statements I have made in "The Letters" and the one I am going to make now.

Her reference to the fact that looking at hospital lights from the sky will not enable one to learn how a hospital works made me realize that, for the same reason, Prof. Bargmann will never learn how the brain works as the mind thinks by looking at scans of glowing brain cells of c. elegans that lighted up on the scan of its brain that she was looking at and made her wonder about the circuits along which that brain cell communicates with the rest of the brain to make the animal respond to the smell it had just perceived, or by looking at "the millions of brain cells" she hopes to look at when the "BRAIN Initiative" experiment works. There is only one way Prof. Bargmann will ever get the answer to her question as to what happens after the brain cells light up on the scan and it is not going to be physical. It is going to be intellectual. She will have to obtain it by performing the "thought experiment" I performed that I have described for president Bush and President Obama in "The Letters" and in "My journey to ASET" the way I performed it, along the trail blazed by Einstein. She will have to ride the beam of light Einstein rode to discover relativity into his eyes, onto his retina and continue the journey by riding the "sensory impulse" as it originates in the retina and travels along the optic nerve to the brain cell in the visual cortex where it will cause the glow on the scan and its physically traceable journey would end. As a result, Prof. Bargmann will loose her ability to trace it further physically and will have to do it intellectually by thought experimentation by asking and answering the four questions of ASET (the short cut for using ATINEMAS) when it will become apparent to her that there is only one way for that brain cells can communicate with all parts of the brain the way we know it does, and do it at a moment's notice, and that is by wireless transmission. These cells emit imperceptible and physically undetectable "thought waves" that disperse in all directions at the same time, waves that are similar to and accompany the detectable electromagnetic waves that make the brain cell light up and become visible on the scan. Had she performed this thought experiment, she would have realized that intellectual communication is not "wired" as "University Professors" who still abide by tenets of conventional wisdom that stopped working centuries ago continue to believe, but have always been by "wireless communication," long before Marconi discovered wireless radio communication. The problem is that no one thought about it because "conventional wisdom and 'University Professors'" who swear by it, prohibit such thoughts.

Prof. Bargmann's experiment is historic, not because it is going to help us "crack the code of the human mind" that she is too late to crack anyway because Einstein, surgeons and perfectionists have already cracked it, but because it is to biology and neuroscience, what the Michelson-Morley Experiment was to theoretical physics and the CERN Neutrino experiment was to particle physics, the end of the road as far as physical investigation is concerned in its own limited area of concern. It is the point of diminishing returns beyond which continued attempts at physical pursuit of goals will result in a the explosive physical destruction of everything involved. Whereas, abandoning physical methods and orchestrating the required paradigm shift and switching to and adopting intellectual methods of though experimentation at this point, will cause "Einstein's I-Bomb" to implode. It will open up whole new avenues of thought and action in a new whole new playing field that will enable transformation of the evolving explosion of the old into an implosion and reconstruction of a new world view in all areas of human interest the way Einstein was able to do in theoretical physics, the one that enabled him to discover his theory of relativity, and make the "problem that seemed insoluble" solve itself.

Whether or not Prof. Bargmann's experiment will yield information about the mechanical methods of diagnosing and treating organic brain disease without damaging or killing brain cells and/or maiming or killing the subjects under study, is something only time will tell if she pursues this course after everything that has been said here, but the chances are that whatever she may discover, she would have discovered faster by thought experimentation leaving her free to pursue the physical benefits of her intellectual discovery instead of squandering time effort and resources on trying to do things that have no logistical chances of success.

(f) In the NIH follow-up report on "The Initiative" titled BRAIN 2025: A Scientific Vision, the person who wrote its "Executive Summary made one statement that I shall deal with here as I am sure Prof. Bargmann, as a lead investigator, is in agreement with them even though she may not have been the person who made these statements.

STATEMENT NO 1: "Truly understanding a circuit...ALSO REQUIRES AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE ALGORITHMS THAT GOVERN INFORMATION PROCESSING within a circuit and between interacting circuits in the brain as a whole...."

MY RESPONSE: This is the statement I have waited all year for someone from the "Dream Team" to make before I filed this complaint and bill of particulars. I wanted to give the "Dream Team" a year to consult all "the greatest minds in the country," draw conclusions, finalize plans-of-action, make statements, commit themselves to a plan of action and go beyond the point of no return and realize that they are not going to be able to take another step if they did not have the algorithms that will act as "the intellectual GPS device" and tell them how to find their way along unknown, uncharted pathways one step at a time. These algorithms are the ones that did the same for Einstein and continues to do the same for surgeons and others who solve "problems that seem insoluble for a living, the algorithms that were given to President Obama that he ignored and instead appointed and authorized his "Dream Team" to go on a goose chase to find them, ACTINEMAS, and ASET, the shortcut for using it!

COMMENT: I did not say a word after I wrote the last of the eight "Letters to The President" because all the "University Professors" and the two American Presidents I have approached have refused to listen to anything I have said without giving any viable reasons for over forty years. I am through giving unsolicited advice. Therefore, I have offered none to the "Dream Team" and they have not bothered to ask even though they have had no problem plagiarizing concepts from "The Letters" freely without acknowledgement. Now all the conditions I had set for myself before I took my next step have been met and the die has been cast. The Secretary of "The Dream team" has made the final statement for the group that I have been waiting for and made it known that the conventional wisdom-based-physical-philosophy the "Dream Team" has followed is not going to take them anywhere until they have "an understanding of the algorithms that govern information processing" that they are not going to have until they have completed "The Initiative" because it is the aim of this "Initiative" to find them, completing the vicious cycle that makes the BRAIN Initiative a classic example of a "catch 22" proposition that it is. At this point, I consider it irresponsible on my part to continue to do nothing and the time has come for me to blow the whistle on this "Initiative," on President Obama and the Leaders of "The Dream Team, and on the hierarchy of "University Professors" and expose the BRAIN Initiative for what it is, a plagiarized bastardized "catch 22" proposition that has no chance of ever working. Hence this report at this time.

The algorithms that govern information processing at all levels of brain and mind function has been discovered, developed and defined by Einstein and others who have solved "problems that seem insoluble" in the past. They were given to President Obama as ACTINEMAS, and ASET its abbreviated version, at the outset of his Presidency. They were given to him with the recommendation that he make this information public knowledge so that he, Congress and all Americans may solve problems they could not solve any other way, live life most efficiently and turn the country around. This information was given to him two years before he initiated the process of implementing as his "BRAIN Initiative," a plan that was identical to the one given to him earlier except for the fact that the plan-of-action to implement President Obama's "Initiative" was the mirror-image opposite of the "The Concept" and "The Recommendations" of "The Letters" given to him earlier. The allegation of plagiarism stems from the fact that these two plan-of-action were identical to one another in all respects but one, and the charge of bastardization into a "catch 22" proposition is based on that one difference, and the fact that it is enough to bastardize it and cause "The Initiative" to fail explosively, whereas the plan that was given to President Obama has always corrected itself converted the impending explosion into a controlled implosion, solved the problem that seemed insoluble and worked every time it has been used in the past and continues to work every time anyone uses it at present and will continue to work forever in the future as long as success is possible, because it abides by the self propagating laws of nature and relativity.

Even if I were to concede for a moment, for arguments sake, that all the individual concepts that constitute "The Initiative" are original thoughts developed independently by President Obama and the leaders of his "Dream Team," the fact remains that the two plan-of-action are mirror-image opposites of one another and only one of them can work! Picking the one that is going to work is simple if one remembers the fact that the plan-of-action adopted by "The Dream Team" is based on "common sense and conventional wisdom," the failures of which led to the development of these "problems that seem insoluble" in the first place making them problems that cannot be solved using "common sense and conventional wisdom by definition, whereas the plan-of-action recommended in "The Letters" has proved to work every time it has been used in the past and continues to work every time it is used by surgeons and others who solve "problems that seem insoluble for a living! Come to think of it, this is what common sense has been trying to tell us all along. The problem is, no one thought of listening to it maybe because conventional wisdom and the "University Professors who profess, advocate it, insist that we ignore our own "better judgments!" On that thought, I shall rest my case.


CONCLUSION.

Thirty pieces of relatively incontrovertible evidence have been presented to prove that President Obama's " BRAIN Mapping Initiative" is a product of plagiarism, a cover up and the bastardization of the only scientific concept that could have turned this country around, into a "catch 22" proposition that has no chance of ever working.

If President Obama and/or the leaders of his "Dream Team" want to dispute or disprove these allegations, they must, offer a concept by concept rebuttal to all thirty arguments by presenting evidence-based statements comparable in quality and substance to the ones offered here that prove the veracity of these allegations. Empty rhetoric that has characterized all of President Obama's platitudes, will not suffice. Arguments like the ones advanced by "University Professors" in the past such as personal slurs, and non-evidence-based blanket statements like "you are crazy," "you are wrong," "you don't know what you are talking about," "you and I will not see eye to eye in this lifetime," and "Do you think you are smarter than Einstein," to mention the choicest few, will not be acceptable. In verbal exchanges, name calling, shouting and loss of composure, and temper tantrums will be considered indications that those who engage in this kind of behavior have run out of valid arguments and will be considered evidence of this fact. Rebuttal must be posted here at this website upon receipt of these allegations and the posting of their responses must be announced with the same degree of publicity with which the concepts of "The Letters" were decried by President Obama and the announcement of "The Initiative" was made. The public has the right to know about these allegations and what President Obama and his "Dream Team" plan to do about it.

If President Obama and the leaders of his "Dream Team" cannot comply with the reasonable requirements set forth above, they must acknowledge this fact and the validity of "The Concepts" and "The Recommendations" of "The Letters" and act upon them post haste as we cannot afford or tolerate five to ten more days of school shootings, random acts of violence, terrorism, war and inaction on national and global issues, leave alone the five to ten years of it that the "dream Team" has estimated they will need before the preliminary answers to the preliminary questions they have asked of their "Initiative" will start trickling in.

If President Obama and/or the leaders of his "Dream Team" cannot comply with the only options available to them detailed above or refuse to do it, "common sense, conventional wisdom and tradition" that are still in vogue since President Obama did not make the paradigm shift that would have made them obsolete, require that plagiarism (the theft of intellectual property) and cover-up (concealment of undesirable information concerning personal acts of commission or omission), are punishable by ostracization for academicians like the "University Professors" heading the "Dream Team" and impeachment for elected officials like the President. Opinions may vary as to whether plagiarism per se of the ideas of an old unknown Indian American immigrant warrants impeachment of the American President, but allowing the country to totter on the verge of potentially preventable disaster for six years and counting, in spite of being informed about the scientific solution to the problem without even determining if it will work, unquestionably warrants it unless he can redeem himself in the time he has left in office by reversing the damage he has done.

Had President Obama orchestrated the paradigm shift he was requested to make, ostracization and impeachment, as dictates and vestiges of the old paradigm that have become as non-functional as the paradigms themselves, would have become obsolete. They should become obsolete because they are wasteful of time and resources and talents of gifted and capable individuals who could still serve themselves and their communities positively if they agree to make the paradigm shifts required in their philosophies and their behavior patterns required for this to happen. Besides being ineffective and serving no useful purpose, these old paradigms create more "problems that seem insoluble" than they solve. Had President Obama made the recommended paradigm shift, these measures would have been replaced with constructive therapeutic options of rehabilitation that would have required first time offenders to redeem themselves by doing what it takes to reverse the damage they have done by their actions and inactions. Repeat offenders who did not have this option of rehabilitation the first time around should be allowed one chance to redeem themselves too. Likewise, President Obama and the leaders of his Dream team" must be offered a chance to redeem themselves by reversing the damage they have done by their actions and inactions, President Obama for six years and "University Professors" possibly from the beginning of time and definitely for the hundred and fifty years since Einstein discovered relativity.

Most "offenders" who fail to abide by the dictates of laws based on common sense and conventional wisdom do not offend from a desire to offend, but are driven to it by desperation born out of their inability to solve "problems that seem insoluble" using common sense and conventional wisdom the way President Obama and the leaders of his "Dream Team" have been forced to do the things they have done. In recognition of the fact that their actions and inactions are partially caused by the failure of "University Professors" to extended the use of "relativity" to everything in life and to instruct everyone on the art and science of solving "problems that seem insoluble," all first-time offenders and repeat offenders who were not offered a chance to learn how to solve "problems that seem insoluble" the first time around, must be required to undergo mandatory rehabilitation by familiarization with the art and science of solving such problems by "Imploding Einstein's I-Bomb" for themselves. All leaders must familiarize themselves with this information and all followers must do the same and insist that all other leaders do it too, including "University Professors," Presidents, Congressmen, religious leaders and leaders of every other description." They must be required to do this by replacing their use of common sense and conventional wisdom for leading with using ACTINEMAS and ASET, the only algorithms available at this time, algorithms based on the understanding of the language the human mind, brain and body use to communicate with one another. They must be offered the assistance needed for transitioning their personal paradigms of thought and action from those based on "common sense and conventional wisdom" that no longer work in our digital atomic age, to those based on ASET and ACTINEMAS respectively. Those in leadership roles who refuse to comply with this fundamental requirement for survival in the digital atomic age, in spite of being informed about the need for making this shift in their paradigms of thought and action, or exhibit a voluntary or involuntary inability to conform to these requirements of natural law, including President Obama, must be dealt with by ostracization, impeachment or other actions as dictated by tradition, until they rehabilitate themselves and or other more effective methods of rehabilitation become available in the future.
Featured ASET Thoughts
ASET in Action